[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-271619-105":59,"doc-detail-271619-en":123},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":116,"head_meta":118,"extra_data":120,"updated_unix":122},105,"en","research-on-performance-based-building-seismic-design-guideline-iii","Research on Performance-Based Building Seismic Design - Guideline (III)","","Guideline (III) expands an earlier performance-based design guideline by adding mathematical modeling and revised acceptance criteria for seismic isolation and energy dissipation systems, plus provisions covering architectural, mechanical, and electrical components. To support the next-stage version, it proposes a reliability-inclusive design framework and replaces local-member-only checks with global structural performance checks. The Demand Capacity Factor Method recommended in FEMA 350 is adopted as revised acceptance criteria, and key framework issues are examined.",{"@graph":69,"@context":115},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-on-performance-based-building-seismic-design-guideline-iii/271619/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/research-on-performance-based-building-seismic-design-guideline-iii/271619.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Mimi","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Which revised acceptance criterion method is used in the next-stage framework?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The Demand Capacity Factor Method (DCFM) recommended in FEMA 350 is employed as the revised acceptance criteria.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":117,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":119,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":121,"site_id":62},271619,1789460993,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":124},{"doc_id":121,"user_id":125,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":126,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":127,"file_id":128,"file_url":129,"file_type":130,"file_size":131,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":132,"language":133,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":134,"faqs":135,"seo_title":136,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":122,"read_time":137,"preview_page_count":4},2336477974920,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Research on Performance-Based Building Seismic Design  \nGuideline (III)  \nTsung-Jen Teng 1, Juin-Fu Chai2, Wen-I Liao3, Wen-Yu Jean4 Yuan-Tao Weng5, Shyh-Bin Chiou 6, Fan-Ru Lin7, and Te-Kuang Chow8  \n鄧崇任1 、柴駿甫 2 、廖文義 3 、簡文郁 4 、翁元滔 5 、邱世彬 6 、林凡茹 7 、周德光8  \nAbstract  \nIn addition to the performance objectives, preliminary design procedure, analysis procedures, and acceptance criteria that recommended in the research projects of 2004 and 2005, in this study. We expand the original guideline (draft) with the supplement of the mathematical modeling and the acceptance criteria for the seismic isolation and energy dissipation systems (chapter 7) as well as the architectural, mechanical, and electrical components (chapter 8) to complete the first version of performance-based design guideline (draft) for the first stage. In order to develop the next stage version, we propose a new design framework to take into account the reliability in both the direct displacement-based design as well as the acceptance criteria. Instead of the acceptance criteria for the local member check, the concept of performance check for global structural system is adopted, and the Demand Capacity Factor Method (DCFM) that is recommended in FEMA 350 is employed as the revised acceptance criteria in the next stage version. We also address and discuss the key issues in the new proposed design framework.  \nKeywords: performance objectives, preliminary design, analysis procedure, acceptance criteria, design framework  \nIntroduction  \nIn the first stage (2004-2006) of the research to develop the performance-based design guideline, the direct displacement-based design that is recommended in Appendix I (Part B) of SEAOC 1999 Blue Book was adopted as the preliminary design methodology. After combining with the performance objectives, analysis procedures, and the acceptance criteria that is recommended by FEMA 356, we have completed the first version of performance-based design guideline for new buildings (draft) . However, there exists some  \ninconsistence in such kind of combination. (i) We did not consider the reliability yet in the original preliminary design phase, even if the seismic performance of a structural system in ESDOF format indeed exhibits a property of diverse distribution for a series of dynamic analysis. (ii) The acceptance criteria adopted in FEMA 356 is merely in a sense of local member check, therefore, only the median values are needed in this approach. Since that local member failure does not necessary imply global failure of the whole structure, the use of median value for local member check is justified.  \n1 Research Fellow, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, [tjteng@ncree.gov.tw](tjteng@ncree.gov.tw).  \n2 Research Fellow, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, [chai@ncree.gov.tw](chai@ncree.gov.tw).  \n3 Associated Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Kaohsiung, [wiliao@nuk.edu.tw](wiliao@nuk.edu.tw).  \n4 Research Fellow, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, [wychien@ncree.gov.tw](wychien@ncree.gov.tw).  \n5 Associated Research Fellow, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, [ytweng@ncree.gov.tw](ytweng@ncree.gov.tw).  \n6 Assistant Research Fellow, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, [sbchiou@ncree.gov.tw](sbchiou@ncree.gov.tw).  \n7 Assistant Research Fellow, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, [frlin@ncree.gov.tw](frlin@ncree.gov.tw).  \n8 Assistant Technology Fellow, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, [tkchow@ncree.gov.tw](tkchow@ncree.gov.tw).  \n2006 NCREE Research Programs and Accomplishments  \nIn order to remedy the aforementioned defects, anew design framework to develop performance-based design guideline is proposed for the next stage version, and Figure 1 illustrates the outlines. In the following, we briefly address and discuss the key issues in the new propos","cbCaimfRQttgzqqZ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimfRQttgzqqZ","pdf",62226862,178,"English","# Introduction\n# 1 Research on Performance Objectives and Preliminary Design\n# 2 Issues on Analysis Procedures and Acceptance Criteria","[{\"question\":\"Which revised acceptance criterion method is used in the next-stage framework?\",\"answer\":\"The Demand Capacity Factor Method (DCFM) recommended in FEMA 350 is employed as the revised acceptance criteria.\"}]","Research on Performance-Based Building Seismic Design - Guideline (III) | PDF",449]