[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-582983-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-582983-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","research-note-march-2023-what-the-research-says-class-size-does-matter","Research Note - March 2023 - What the research says: Class size does matter","","Research Note (March 2023) synthesizes evidence on class size reduction (CSR) and challenges simplified claims about student test scores. It finds the research is contested and ongoing, with standardized testing only one lens for evaluating CSR’s effects. While smaller classes show stronger benefits for younger learners, CSR research often overlooks broader classroom dynamics, teaching conditions, and student learning experience. The note also critiques arguments that class size is unimportant, highlighting methodological and philosophical weaknesses and emphasizing that reducing class size is not a standalone solution.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-note-march-2023-what-the-research-says-class-size-does-matter/582983/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/research-note-march-2023-what-the-research-says-class-size-does-matter/582983.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Rhys","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-07","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What does the research say about whether class size matters?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The note concludes the issue is contested, but broadly indicates class size reduction can positively affect students’ academic performance, especially in early grades.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Why is relying mainly on standardized test scores insufficient for evaluating CSR?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Standardized testing narrows the discussion and limits understanding of how CSR influences teaching conditions, classroom environment, and the overall student learning experience.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How does the note critique arguments that smaller class size is not important?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It describes critiques as addressing philosophical and methodological weaknesses, including concerns about how opponents frame class size in relation to educational interventions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},582983,1792401190,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":113,"preview_page_count":4},687207024643,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","Research Note  \nMarch 2023  \nWhat the research says:  \nClass size does matter  \nKey Takeaways:  \n• The research on class size reduction is not definitive but a contested, ongoing debate.  \n• Student performance on standardized tests is not the only measure by which to examine the impacts of Class Size Reduction (CSR).  \n• The research on CSR has been severely limited by the singular focus on student academic performance, although some studies have sought to expand the conversation by focusing on the impact of CSR on teaching conditions, classroom environment, student learning experience.  \n• The research showing ‘class size isn’t important’ has been extensively critiqued for philosophical and methodological weaknesses.  \n• Reducing class size in and of itself is not a magic bullet. It’s more about what teachers and students can do when class sizes are lower, and a growing number of studies illustrate the way teaching and students’ learning experience can change with smaller class sizes.  \n• Class size is an important condition to teachers’ work that impacts recruitment and retention.  \nWhat the research says: Class size does matter  \nClass size has been a topic of intense debate among teachers, administrators, academics, and educational authorities (i. e. , Ministry of Education) for decades. There is a relatively large body of research on class size, most of which has focused on determining whether class size reduction (CSR) has an impact on student academic achievement. There is also a smaller (but growing) body of research that looks at how CSR impacts teaching and learning in the classroom.  \nBecause classrooms are complex social contexts, it is challenging to isolate and determine the influence of one variable, such as class size, on any aspect of school experience (Bouguen, Grenet, & Gurgand, 2017). Most research to date has looked at student achievement on standardized tests to make claims about the impact and merits of CSR (Bascia & Faubert, 2012; Blatchford, 2012; Blatchford, Russell & Brown, 2009; Laitsch, Nguyen, Ho Younghusband, 2021). Varying perspectives have emerged within this much-debated arena, but there is general agreement, widely accepted regardless of where one stands on the issue, that smaller classes have a positive impact on younger students’ academic performance, appearing most beneficial in the early years between Kindergarten to Grade 3 (Blatchford, Russell & Brown, 2009; Harfitt & Tsui, 2015; Laitsch, Nguyen, Ho Younghusband, 2021).  \nCSR research focusing solely on  \nstudent performance misses the mark  \nA key hinge point in the discussion on CSR in relation to student academic achievement has been the cost of implementing small class sizes. However, the myopic focus on student achievement on standardized tests as the key mechanism for meaningful discussion on CSR is significantly limiting and does little to help scholars, practitioners and policy makers understand how class size may impact the teaching and learning experience holistically (Bascia & Faubert, 2012; Harfitt & Tsui, 2015).  \nFor those looking at the issue through an economic lens of costbenefit analysis, the cost does not justify the small potential gains that education systems may see in terms of student achievement (i. e. , improved test scores). Further, if there is some benefit it is better to invest in CSR in the earlier grades only (Hanushek, 1998; Hattie, 2009).  \nMarch 2023 BCTF Research Note page 3  \nWhat the research says: Class size does matter  \nHowever, other scholars have argued there’s more to the CSR conversation than simply economics.  \nThe narrow focus on student test achievement ignores the dynamic and complex realities of classrooms and the entire teaching and learning experience. As Peter Blatchford, renowned scholar on class size research has written,“the class sizes debate is tired and asks the wrong questions” (Blatchford, 2015). It is vital to meaningfully consider other outcomes of education apart from test ","cbCaiv1h6E356XoH","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiv1h6E356XoH","pdf",306885,12,"English","# Key Takeaways\n# What the research says: Class size does matter\n## Evidence focus and debate context\n# CSR research focusing solely on student performance misses the mark\n# The narrow focus ignores classroom complexity\n# The research showing 'class size isn’t important' has been extensively critiqued\n## Questioning Hattie’s dismissal of smaller class size\n# Three reasons to question Hattie’s dismissal of smaller class size\n## Erroneous understanding of class size as a pedagogical intervention","[{\"question\":\"What does the research say about whether class size matters?\",\"answer\":\"The note concludes the issue is contested, but broadly indicates class size reduction can positively affect students’ academic performance, especially in early grades.\"},{\"question\":\"Why is relying mainly on standardized test scores insufficient for evaluating CSR?\",\"answer\":\"Standardized testing narrows the discussion and limits understanding of how CSR influences teaching conditions, classroom environment, and the overall student learning experience.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the note critique arguments that smaller class size is not important?\",\"answer\":\"It describes critiques as addressing philosophical and methodological weaknesses, including concerns about how opponents frame class size in relation to educational interventions.\"}]","Research Note - March 2023 - What the research says: Class size does matter | PDF",1792045242]