[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-585721-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-585721-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","research-information-management-in-the-united-states-part-2-case-studies","Research Information Management in the United States - Part 2 - Case Studies","","Research Information Management in the United States: Part 2—Case Studies documents how research information management practices are implemented across multiple universities. The report focuses on concrete systems, workflows, and metadata approaches used to support activity insight, research portals, and researcher metadata databases. It also covers RIM origins, use cases, metadata and sources, and forward-looking “What’s next?” guidance, showing variations between Penn State University, Texas A&M University, and Virginia Tech.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-information-management-in-the-united-states-part-2-case-studies/585721/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/research-information-management-in-the-united-states-part-2-case-studies/585721.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Riley West","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-09","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",5,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the report’s focus in Part 2?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Part 2 centers on case studies describing how research information management is carried out in the United States.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Which universities’ implementations are highlighted?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The contents list Penn State University, Texas A&M University, and Virginia Tech, each with introductions, origin story material, and system and metadata discussions.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What kinds of components are repeatedly discussed across the case studies?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The report repeatedly addresses activity insight, research portals, researcher metadata databases, use cases, metadata and sources, and a “What’s next?” section for future directions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},585721,1792171682,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},1099523885074,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","NOVEMBER 2 0 2 1 OCLC RESEARCH REPORT  \nPA RT T WO  \nCase Studies  \nResearch Information Management in the United States  \nResearch Information  \nManagement in the United States: Part 2—Case Studies  \nRebecca Bryant  \nOCLC Research  \nJan Fransen  \nUniversity of Minnesota  \nPablo de Castro  \nStrathclyde University and euroCRIS  \nBrenna Helmstutler  \nSyracuse University  \nDavid Scherer  \nCarnegie Mellon University  \n© 2021 OCLC.  \nThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  \n[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)  \nNovember 2021 OCLC Research  \nDublin, Ohio 43017 USA  \n[www.oclc.org](www.oclc.org)  \nISBN: 978-1-55653-218-4  \nDOI: 10.25333/qv1f-9e57  \nOCLC Control Number: 1281672986  \nORCID iDs  \nRebecca Bryant, OCLC Research  [https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3881](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3881)  \nJan Fransen, University of Minnesota  [https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-2761](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-2761)  \nPablo de Castro, Strathclyde University and euroCRIS  [https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-1033](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-1033)  \nBrenna Helmstutler, Syracuse University  [https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5549-9935](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5549-9935)  \nDavid Scherer, Carnegie Mellon University  [https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-4331](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-4331)  \n[Please direct correspondence to:](Please direct correspondence to:)  \nOCLC Research  \n[oclcresearch@oclc.org](oclcresearch@oclc.org)  \n[Suggested citation:](Suggested citation:)  \nBryant, Rebecca, Jan Fransen, Pablo de Castro. Brenna Helmstutler, and David Scherer. 2021. Research Information Management in the United States: Part 2—Case Studies. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research.  \n[https://doi.org/10.25333/qv1f-9e5](https://doi.org/10.25333/qv1f-9e57)[7](https://doi.org/10.25333/qv1f-9e57).  \nCONTENTS  \nIntroduction ......................................................................................... 1  \nPenn State University ......................................................................... 2  \nIntroduction..............................................................................................................2  \nOrigin story...............................................................................................................2  \nActivity Insight ...................................................................................................2  \nPenn State Research Portal ................................................................................3  \nResearcher Metadata Database .........................................................................4  \nUse cases ..................................................................................................................5  \nActivity Insight ....................................................................................................5  \nPenn State Research Portal ................................................................................5  \nResearcher Metadata Database .........................................................................6  \nRIM systems..............................................................................................................6  \nActivity Insight ....................................................................................................6  \nPenn State Research Portal ................................................................................9  \nResearcher Metadata Database ....................................................................... 12  \nMetadata and sources............................................................................................ 15  \nWhat’s next? ........................................................................................................... 16  \nActivity Insight .................................................................................................. 16","cbCaiuMNlgjUhEmZ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuMNlgjUhEmZ","pdf",4134615,92,"English","# Introduction\n# Penn State University\n## Origin story\n## Activity Insight\n## Penn State Research Portal\n## Researcher Metadata Database\n## Use cases\n# Texas A&M University\n## RIM origin story\n## Use cases\n## RIM system\n## Metadata and sources\n## What’s next?\n# Virginia Tech\n## Origin story\n## Open access advocacy\n## Faculty activity reporting\n## Incentive-based budgeting\n## Public portal","[{\"question\":\"What is the report’s focus in Part 2?\",\"answer\":\"Part 2 centers on case studies describing how research information management is carried out in the United States.\"},{\"question\":\"Which universities’ implementations are highlighted?\",\"answer\":\"The contents list Penn State University, Texas A\\u0026M University, and Virginia Tech, each with introductions, origin story material, and system and metadata discussions.\"},{\"question\":\"What kinds of components are repeatedly discussed across the case studies?\",\"answer\":\"The report repeatedly addresses activity insight, research portals, researcher metadata databases, use cases, metadata and sources, and a “What’s next?” section for future directions.\"}]","Research Information Management in the United States - Part 2 - Case Studies | PDF",1792055651,232]