[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-110913-en":3,"doc-seo-110913-105":28,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":89},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"site_id":23,"html_lang":22,"table_of_contents":24,"faqs":25,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":26,"read_time":27},110913,1374391974564,"Clementine","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/14000253aa45c000a9e?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1779874745381141002",8,"Research & Report","Report to the Board from the Committee on Development Effectiveness - Using Evaluative Evidence to Deliver Development Outcomes","Meeting notes for a World Bank Group Board report covering the committee’s review of a Management Report on implementing IEG recommendations for FY17-21 and an independent validation of management progress. The discussion emphasizes building feedback loops, improving the quality and strategic relevance of recommendations, and strengthening how Management defines and tests links between actions and development outcomes. Members also focus on systematic evidence collection, outcome-oriented progress milestones, consistent progress reporting, flexibility for post-Covid realities, and retirement and monitoring of selected recommendations.","Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized  \nUsing Evaluative Evidence to Deliver Development Outcomes  \nA World Bank Group Management Report on Implementation of  \nIEG Recommendations FY17-21  \nand  \nValidation of Management Progress on IEG Evaluation Recommendations  \nAn Independent Evaluation  \nReport to the Board from the  \nCommittee on Development Effectiveness ∗  \nMeeting of September 22, 2021  \nThe Committee on Development Effectiveness met to consider the World Bank Group Management Report Using Evaluative Evidence to Deliver Development Outcomes-A World Bank Group Management Report on Implementation of IEG Recommendations FY17-21 (CODE2021-0048), together with the Validation of Management Progress on IEG Evaluation Recommendations: An Independent Evaluation (CODE2021-0053) .  \nThe Committee welcomed the WBG Management Report (MAR Report) and IEG’s Validation Report and the constructive and collaborative IEG-Management engagement. Members highlighted that the MAR process was moving in the right direction and was leading to building feedback loops; refining the quality, practicality, and strategic relevance ofIEG's recommendations; and, improving the way Management responds to, tracks and reportson progress toward the intended outcomes ofIEG evaluations and recommendations. Yet, members noted there still was room for improving the way plausible casual links from actions to outcomes are defined and tested; the evidence used to discern the extent of progress; and a need to reach a shared understanding of the evaluations’ intended outcomes. They agreed with the need for IEG and Management to continue collaborating closely to develop a systematic approach to improve evidence collection, define outcome-oriented progress milestones and ensure a consistent framework to report on progress and for assessing evidence of progress on the implementation of IEG recommendations.  \nMembers appreciated Management’s efforts to develop a systemic approach for reporting on IEG recommendations; the thematic grouping of Management’s actions along IEG’s six workstreams and aligning them with corporate strategic priorities. They welcomed Management’s and IEG’s continuous efforts to improve development outcomes based on strong evidence and knowledge sharing and were pleased to learn that the WB is taking a leading role in the MDB working group on managing for development results. Some highlighted the importance for the MAR process to provide enough flexibility to adjust to the post-Covid reality and enable IEG and Management to prioritize the most relevant recommendations. They encouraged Management to consider reviewing the strategic priorities or framework in situations where there is a lackluster client demand, to remain responsive to clients.  \nThe Committee supported WBG Management’s and IEG’s proposal to retire 20 recommendations and to continue monitoring and demonstrating impact on the remaining 39 recommendations, including those WB’s related to carbon finance funds. Some expressed concern regarding the retirement of recommendations related to knowledge management, underscoring that the best way to report progress on the knowledge agenda is through a concrete, actionable, and measurable WBG knowledge management action plan with timebound deliverables, as requested during the CODE meeting on the Knowledge Strategic Framework (KSF) . They welcomed Management’s commitment to engage with CODE on the KSF follow up matrix.  \nMembers welcomed IEG’s and Management’s commitment to continue working to address the abovementioned issues raised by members, such as plausible links from actions to outcomes, the evidence regarding the progress; and the need to reach a shared understanding of the evaluations’ intended outcomes.  \n∗ This report is not an approved record.","cbCaieaR27GTDCVV","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaieaR27GTDCVV","pdf",145434,1,"English","en",105,"# Committee Review\n## Focus Areas and Evidence Approach\n## Evidence, Milestones, and Progress Reporting\n## Recommendation Retirement and Monitoring","[{\"question\":\"What two documents did the committee consider during the September 22, 2021 meeting?\",\"answer\":\"The committee considered the World Bank Group Management Report on implementing IEG recommendations for FY17-21 and the independent evaluation validating management progress on IEG evaluation recommendations.\"},{\"question\":\"What improvements did members highlight for the management report process?\",\"answer\":\"Members emphasized refining recommendations for quality and strategic relevance, building feedback loops, and improving how plausible causal links and progress evidence are defined, tested, and reported.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the committee address the handling of IEG recommendations going forward?\",\"answer\":\"The committee supported retiring 20 recommendations and continuing to monitor and demonstrate impact on the remaining 39, while also discussing needs for actionable, measurable knowledge management planning.\"}]",1784487685,3,{"code":4,"msg":29,"data":30},"ok",{"site_id":23,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":26},"report-to-the-board-from-the-committee-on-development-effectiveness-using-evaluative-evidence-to-deliver-development-outcomes","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,51,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":27},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/report-to-the-board-from-the-committee-on-development-effectiveness-using-evaluative-evidence-to-deliver-development-outcomes/110913/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"inLanguage":22,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-22","2026-07-19",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What two documents did the committee consider during the September 22, 2021 meeting?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"The committee considered the World Bank Group Management Report on implementing IEG recommendations for FY17-21 and the independent evaluation validating management progress on IEG evaluation recommendations.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"What improvements did members highlight for the management report process?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Members emphasized refining recommendations for quality and strategic relevance, building feedback loops, and improving how plausible causal links and progress evidence are defined, tested, and reported.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"How did the committee address the handling of IEG recommendations going forward?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"The committee supported retiring 20 recommendations and continuing to monitor and demonstrate impact on the remaining 39, while also discussing needs for actionable, measurable knowledge management planning.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":23},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":90},[91,95,99,103,108,113,118,121,126,129,133],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":45,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":50,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":100,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":102},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":104,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":105,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":107},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":109,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":110,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":112},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":114,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":115,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":119,"slug":120},30,"research-report",{"id":122,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":123,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":125},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":127,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":128},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":130,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":131,"show_sort_weight":130,"slug":132},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":134,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":44,"category_name":135,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":136},19,"General","general"]