[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-296950-105":59,"doc-detail-296950-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","report-on-the-2022-admissions-round-new-admissions-process-implemented","Report on the 2022 Admissions Round - new admissions process implemented","","Report on the 2022 Admissions Round for Law, outlining overall applicant volumes, interview and offer outcomes, and success-rate funneling across Law, LSE, and combined Law/LSE routes. It details centralized shortlisting under a Faculty Selection Committee, changes following an admissions review, and how rescues from deselected pools are handled. It also summarizes LNAT and LNAT Multiple Choice/Essay scoring distributions, second-college interview outcomes, senior status treatment, and Opportunity Oxford performance, supported by appendix statistics on applicant breakdowns.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/report-on-the-2022-admissions-round-new-admissions-process-implemented/296950/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/report-on-the-2022-admissions-round-new-admissions-process-implemented/296950.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Berry Peter","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-06","2026-09-18",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",17,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How many applications, interview invites, and offers were recorded in the 2022 Admissions Round?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"2141 applications were received for about 240 undergraduate places. 666 candidates were invited to interview for Law, and 240 offers were made.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What changes were introduced to the admissions process for 2022?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The law faculty implemented changes following an admissions process review, including college-blind consideration by the Faculty Selection Committee and centralized shortlisting with colleges requesting rescues of deselected candidates.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"How were LNAT essays marked and what scoring summary was provided?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"LNAT essays were marked using a comparison marking system (No More Marking) that anonymised essays and compared two at a time, producing numerical scores. The report provides average, highest, and lowest scores for all candidates, shortlisted candidates, and those offered a place, for both LNAT essay and LNAT Multiple Choice (and related components).","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},296950,1790060599,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":19,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":52,"preview_page_count":4},1374402524268,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","Report on the 2022 Admissions Round (new admissions process implemented)  \nOverall picture  \n2141 applications were received for approximately 240 undergraduate places this year (excluding – senior status applications) . There were approximately 8.92 applicants per available place.  \n(54 Senior status applications, applications are separate from other applications)  \n666 were invited to interview for Law, equating to 2.8 per place.  \n240 offers were made: 192 for Jurisprudence and 48 for Law with Law Studies in Europe. Broken down by course:  \n1780 applications for Law alone were received. 560 candidates were interviewed.  \n361 applications for LSE alone were received. 106 candidates were interviewed. 48 offers were made.  \n10 Colleges participated in the Open Offer Scheme, making 10 offers between them. Colleges making Open Offers are:  \n\n| College | Number of offers |\n| --- | --- |\n| Balliol | 1 |\n| Corpus Christi | 1 |\n| Exeter | 1 |\n| Mansfield | 1 |\n| Merton | 1 |\n| Pembroke | 1 |\n| St Anne's | 1 |\n| St Hilda's | 1 |\n| St John's | 1 |\n| Total | 10 |\n\nLaw/LSE has an application to interview success rate of 31.1%, an interview to offer success rate of 36.03%, with an application to offer success rate of 11.20%.  \nLaw alone has an application to interview success rate of 31.46%, an interview to offer success rate of 34.28%, with an application to offer success rate of 10.78%.  \nLSE alone has an application to interview success rate of 29.36%, an interview to offer success rate of 45.28%, with an application to offer success rate of 13.29%.  \nSecond College Interviews  \nAll colleges took part in 2nd or 3rd interviews.  \n215 Law/LSE candidates received a second interview at another college. Of these, 118 were made an offer. 25 of these offers were made by College 2. Overall, 10.4% of offers were made by College 2.  \nPlease see App. 1 for further data from the admissions cycle.  \nSenior Status (not included in stats)  \n54 Senior status applications were received. 24 were interviewed, 7 were made an offer. Senior status candidates had an application to interview rate of 44%, an interview to offer rate of  \n34.28% and an application to offer success rate of 12.96%.  \n11 Senior status candidates were second interviewed at another college. Of these, 4 were made an offer. 1 of these offers was made by College 2. Overall, 14% of offers were made by College 2.  \nThe Admissions Process  \nThis year the law faculty implemented several changes to the admissions process following the Admissions Process Review. All applications were considered college blind by the Faculty Selection Committee and a shortlist produced, to which colleges then added candidates by requesting to rescue deselected candidates (both from the Rescue List and from the general pool of deselected candidates) .  \nCentralised shortlisting  \nA Faculty Selection committee (FSC) comprised one representative from 15 of the 31 Colleges involved in the Law Admissions Process, and a further presentative from Harris Manchester College. Next year the remaining 16 Colleges will provide 1 member each to sit on the committee.  \nCentralised LNAT Marking  \nThe LNAT was marked using No More Marking, a comparison marking system that anonymised LNAT essays and allowed markers to compare 2 essays at a time. The system created a numerical score once the essays were assessed.  \nLNAT essays score of all candidates: Average score: 62.8  \nHighest score: 74  \nLowest score: 50  \nLNAT essays score of those shortlisted: Average score: 65  \nHighest score: 74  \nLowest score: 53  \nLNAT essay score of those offered a place  \nAverage score: 65.7  \nHighest score: 74  \nLowest score: 56  \nLNATMCT score of all candidates: Average score: 24.2  \nHighest score: 38  \nLowest score: 5  \nLNATMCT score of those shortlisted: Average score: 28.3  \nHighest score: 38  \nLowest score: 13  \nLNATMCT score of those offered a place Average score: 30  \nHighest score: 38  \nLowest score: 19  \nDistribution graphs of marks (separ","cbCaieTlxvAihAC8","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaieTlxvAihAC8","pdf",152185,"English","# Overall picture\n## Second College Interviews\n## Senior Status (not included in stats)\n# The Admissions Process\n## Centralised shortlisting\n## Centralised LNAT Marking\n## Shortlisting Ranking formula\n# Opportunity Oxford – Bridging Programme\n# Appendix 1: Law Faculty Statistics and Information","[{\"question\":\"How many applications, interview invites, and offers were recorded in the 2022 Admissions Round?\",\"answer\":\"2141 applications were received for about 240 undergraduate places. 666 candidates were invited to interview for Law, and 240 offers were made.\"},{\"question\":\"What changes were introduced to the admissions process for 2022?\",\"answer\":\"The law faculty implemented changes following an admissions process review, including college-blind consideration by the Faculty Selection Committee and centralized shortlisting with colleges requesting rescues of deselected candidates.\"},{\"question\":\"How were LNAT essays marked and what scoring summary was provided?\",\"answer\":\"LNAT essays were marked using a comparison marking system (No More Marking) that anonymised essays and compared two at a time, producing numerical scores. The report provides average, highest, and lowest scores for all candidates, shortlisted candidates, and those offered a place, for both LNAT essay and LNAT Multiple Choice (and related components).\"}]","Report on the 2022 Admissions Round - new admissions process implemented | PDF",1789739049]