[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-294482-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-294482-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","report-of-proceedings-june-10-12-2026","Report of Proceedings - June 10-12, 2026","","Report of Proceedings documents a formal ACPE Public Interest Panel review and the subsequent accreditation actions taken at the ACPE Board of Directors meeting on June 10–12, 2026. The Panel met to discuss professional degree programs scheduled for review, and its comments were presented to the Board for consideration. The report records accreditation decisions for Doctor of Pharmacy programs, including continued accredited status and probation outcomes, and identifies compliance findings tied to accreditation standards.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/report-of-proceedings-june-10-12-2026/294482/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/report-of-proceedings-june-10-12-2026/294482.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Ethan Miller","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-09-17",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",21,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What was the purpose of the ACPE Public Interest Panel meeting on June 1, 2026?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The Panel met to discuss professional degree programs scheduled for review by the ACPE Board of Directors at its June 10–12, 2026 meeting.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What types of accreditation terms are described in the report?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The report defines actions such as “affirm” and “continue,” explaining that “affirm” confirms an existing accreditation term and “continue” extends the accreditation date.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What review cycle durations does the report state for established and new programs?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Established accredited programs use an eight-year customary review cycle, while new programs achieving initial accredited status use a two-year customary review cycle.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},294482,1789689125,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":128,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},687207017582,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","ACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR PHARMACY EDUCATION  \nREPORT OF PROCEEDINGS  \nJune 10-12, 2026  \nI.  Public Interest Panel Review of Professional Degree Programs  \nThe ACPE Public Interest Panel met on June 1 , 2026 , to discuss the professional degree programs scheduled for review by the ACPE Board of Directors during its June 10-12 , 2026 , meeting. Evaluation team reports and other materials associated with the evaluation of the professional degree programs were duly considered, and a report of the Panel’s discussion was prepared and presented to the ACPE Board at its June 10-12 , 2026 , meeting. The Board considered the comments and recommendations of the Panel. Panel members who participated in the meeting of the Public Interest Panel were: Tim Donovan, Judy Martin-Holland, and Margaret Steele.  \nII. Accreditation Actions for Professional Degree Programs, taken at the ACPE Board of Directors Meeting, June 10-12, 2026  \nA list of accredited professional degree programs of colleges and schools of pharmacy, which designates the respective preaccreditation and accreditation status of the programs and the academic year for the next currently scheduled evaluation, is posted on the ACPE web site [at ](at www.acpe-accredit.org)[www.acpe-accredit.org](at www.acpe-accredit.org).  \nAccreditation Actions  \nOn the basis of self-studies, comprehensive and focused evaluations, communications received from the institutions, ongoing annual review of North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) passing rates, entry class size, and attrition and on-time graduation rates, as well as the comments of the Public Interest Panel, the Board of Directors determined the accreditation status of the following professional programs, along with preaccreditation and accreditation terms and conditions.  \nIn order to be eligible for initial or continuing accreditation, the Doctor of Pharmacy program must be part of an independent College or School of Pharmacy or a College or School of Pharmacy within a University, which is regularly incorporated and is a legally empowered postsecondary educational institution. The institution housing the College or School, or the independent College or School, must be accredited by a national accreditation agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education, another agency acceptable to the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) , or actively seeking such status and in good standing with that agency. Accreditation standards call for a College or School of Pharmacy as an organizational unit and the administrative structure of the College or School of Pharmacy must provide for a Dean, who serves as the chief administrative and academic officer. Evaluation for purposes of preaccreditation and initial or continued accreditation requires an invitation by the chief executive officer, or designate, of the institution.  \nAn action to “affirm” implies that a previously established accreditation term has been confirmed. An action to “continue” implies that the accreditation date has been extended.  \nThe customary review cycle for established accredited programs is eight years. The customary review cycle for new programs achieving initial accredited status is two years.  \nThe dates indicated in parentheses for each College or School are the academic year of the most recent determination of accreditation status and the academic year of the next scheduled comprehensive or focused review for determination of accreditation status, and thus define the present accreditation term for the Doctor of Pharmacy program. An (*) following these dates indicate a shortened accreditation term.  \nThe accreditation actions are as follows:  \nContinued Accredited Status  \nChicago State University College of Health Sciences and Pharmacy School of Pharmacy  \nDoctor of Pharmacy Program: Accredited status continued. (2025-2026) (2027-2028)*  \nThe ACPE Board of Directors finds the Doctor of Pharmacy program to be in compliance with all acc","cbCaimXLmKc981ba","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimXLmKc981ba","pdf",166137,"English","# Public Interest Panel Review of Professional Degree Programs\n## Panel meeting discussion and submission to the ACPE Board\n# Accreditation Actions for Professional Degree Programs\n## Accreditation eligibility and standards framework\n## Continued accredited status decisions\n## Accredited with probation status decisions","[{\"question\":\"What was the purpose of the ACPE Public Interest Panel meeting on June 1, 2026?\",\"answer\":\"The Panel met to discuss professional degree programs scheduled for review by the ACPE Board of Directors at its June 10–12, 2026 meeting.\"},{\"question\":\"What types of accreditation terms are described in the report?\",\"answer\":\"The report defines actions such as “affirm” and “continue,” explaining that “affirm” confirms an existing accreditation term and “continue” extends the accreditation date.\"},{\"question\":\"What review cycle durations does the report state for established and new programs?\",\"answer\":\"Established accredited programs use an eight-year customary review cycle, while new programs achieving initial accredited status use a two-year customary review cycle.\"}]","Report of Proceedings - June 10-12, 2026 | PDF",48]