[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-322317-105":59,"doc-detail-322317-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","report-no6-march-16-1979-96th-congress-1st-session-alaska-lands","Report No.6 - March 16, 1979 - 96th Congress - 1st Session - ALASKA LANDS","","Report No. 6 dated March 16, 1979 summarizes 96th Congress, 1st Session activities and hearings related to Alaska lands, nuclear waste management, and oil spill legislation. It details subcommittee travel and witness testimony, including perspectives from officials such as Governor Jay Hammond and Senator Mike Gravel. It also covers the WIPP discussion, state veto rights and surface storage concerns, the Interagency Review Group’s findings, and House efforts to advance oil spill liability measures including strict liability, compensation funds, and claims procedures.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/report-no6-march-16-1979-96th-congress-1st-session-alaska-lands/322317/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/report-no6-march-16-1979-96th-congress-1st-session-alaska-lands/322317.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Finn","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-14","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",15,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What did the subcommittee do regarding the Alaska lands investigation?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It carried the Alaska Lands Bill investigation to Fairbanks and heard testimony from over 75 witnesses, then toured multiple sites including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and related areas.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What issues were discussed in the Energy hearing about nuclear waste management?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The hearing covered the proposed Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), state veto rights for disposal-site location, and surface storage as a temporary approach until longer-term technology is proven.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What main elements were outlined for the proposed oil spill liability legislation?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The measures would establish strict liability for oil-discharge owners and operators, create a backup compensation fund, set funding levels via a per-barrel fee, supersede duplicative funds, require evidence of financial responsibility, and provide a simple claims settlement procedure.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},322317,1790111600,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},34359740700684,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/1f400023980c374ae676?_k=1777273430885731487","Report No.6  \nMarch 16,1979  \n96th Congress  \nlst Session  \n## ALASKA LANDS\n\nThe House Merchant Marine Subcommittee on Fisheries,Wi1dlife Conservation and theEnvironment carried their investigation of the Alaska Lands Bil1 to Fairbanks on theweekend of March 10 and 11.Over 75 witnesses,including Governor Jay Hammond andSenator Mike Gravel(Alaska),testified Saturday in a hearing that lasted from 8 a.m。unti19p.m.Then,in a whir1wind tour on Sunday,the subcommittee viewed parts of thecontroversial Arctic National Wi1dlife Refuge,the Yukon Flats Refuge,the Kenai NationalMonument,the Copper River Delta,and the far edge of the Wrangel1-St.Elias NationalPark and Preserve.Also included was an on-site tour of the Prudhoe Bay 011 facility,and a glimpse of the National Petroleum Reserve on the North Slope.  \nMark-up of the Bil1 is tentatively scheduled to begin March 22,with ful1 committeeconsideration beginning by the first week in April.  \n## ENERGY\n\nThe continuing and increasingly controversial debate on nuclear waste managementwent through another round on March 13 at a hearing of the Senate Governmental AffairsSubcommittee on Energy,Nuclear Proliferation and Federa1 Services.The day also markedthe release of the final report of the Interagency Review Group(IRG)on Nuclear WasteManagement.The IRG was composed of members from 14 government agencies,3 of whomappeared as witnesses at the March 13 hearing.  \nChairman John Glenn(Ohio)called the hearing to discuss the proposed Waste Isola-tion Pilot Plant(WIPP)in New Mexico,the question of state veto rights concerning thelocation of a disposal site,and surface storage of nuclear waste as temporary solutionuntil permanent storage technologies have been perfected.He expressed concern over the\"serious technical problems which have come to light concerning the use of salt as ageologic medium for disposing of spent fuel or high level waste.\"  \nTwo panels,one of scientists and the other of agency representatives,testified onthe above issues.Although the technical experts were optimistic about methods for wastedisposa1,none could assure the committee that a reliable technology would be availablewithin the next 10 to 20 years.  A11 stressed the need for more research into thedisposal of high level wastes and spent fuel,and agreed with Glenn's concern about thenecessity of setting standards before actual programs are begun.  \nThe government representatives,led by John M.Deutch of the Department of Energy,out1ined the findings and proposals of the final IRG report.   Deutch said that the finalreport differed from the draft in a number of ways,including a restatement of objectivesand a restatement of technical findings of the state of the knowledge of nuclear wastedisposal methods.  He assured Glenn that the question of state veto rights had beenspelled out more in the final report.To Glenn's query as to what would happen if al150states decided not to concur in the proposed \"consultation and concurrence\"approach torepository siting,Deutch replied that it would be a \"very difficult\"situation.Glennrepeatedly stated his concern that if we go ahead with a disposal site now,given thepresent uncertain technology,we might have \"a11 this junk bubbling up someplace 50 yearsfrom now.\"In order to prevent that from happening,he alluded to legislation that heand Senator Charles Percy(I11.)are writing.Glenn seemed to favor surface storage ofnuclear waste in its present pools of water at reactor sites,and if necessary ataway-from-reactor(AFR)sites,until the subsur face technology has been proven reliableand safe.  \nTHIS I5 A FRESERVICE TO A55oCIATE MEMBERSMADE POSSIELE BY CONTRIBUTIONS TO NWF.  \nOIL SPILL LEGISLATION  \nThe House has recommen ced efforts to enact oil sp111 liability legislation.OnMarch 13,the Coast Guard and Navigation Subcommittee of the Merchant Marine FisheriesCommittee opened hearings on H.R.85 and H.R.29.  The measures are nearly identical to  \nH.R.6803,a bill which passed overwhelmingly in the H","cbCaicnaNvxdMX0a","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaicnaNvxdMX0a","pdf",1352088,"English","# ALASKA LANDS\n# ENERGY\n# OIL SPILL LEGISLATION\n# PARK SERVICE","[{\"question\":\"What did the subcommittee do regarding the Alaska lands investigation?\",\"answer\":\"It carried the Alaska Lands Bill investigation to Fairbanks and heard testimony from over 75 witnesses, then toured multiple sites including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and related areas.\"},{\"question\":\"What issues were discussed in the Energy hearing about nuclear waste management?\",\"answer\":\"The hearing covered the proposed Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), state veto rights for disposal-site location, and surface storage as a temporary approach until longer-term technology is proven.\"},{\"question\":\"What main elements were outlined for the proposed oil spill liability legislation?\",\"answer\":\"The measures would establish strict liability for oil-discharge owners and operators, create a backup compensation fund, set funding levels via a per-barrel fee, supersede duplicative funds, require evidence of financial responsibility, and provide a simple claims settlement procedure.\"}]","Report No.6 - March 16, 1979 - 96th Congress - 1st Session - ALASKA LANDS | PDF",1789962406,13]