[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-322991-105":59,"doc-detail-322991-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","report-no32-energy-policy-1979","Report No.32 - Energy Policy - 1979","","Report No. 32 dated December 21, 1979 summarizes congressional and conference progress in the 96th Congress, first session, with emphasis on energy-related legislation under debate. It covers the handling of the energy tax and renewable-energy incentives, the Energy Mobilization Board (EMB) conference status, and negotiations over energy mobilization and synthetic fuels commercialization, including issues such as NEPA-related limitations and Defense Production Act authority. It also summarizes committee action on coal slurry pipelines, and bills covering fisheries, fish and wildlife, and land-use management.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/report-no32-energy-policy-1979/322991/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/report-no32-energy-policy-1979/322991.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Clementine","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What does the report state about the Congress’s session status on December 21, 1979?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It states Congress went into pro forma sessions until “business-as-usual” work resumed in the Second Session on January 22, 1980, and that the Congress is not officially in recess or adjournment under this procedure.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What major energy legislation items were still under debate at the end of the first session?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The report highlights three major energy pieces still under debate in conference committees: the windfall profits tax bill, the fate of various tax expenditures including renewable-energy and energy conservation incentives, and conference negotiations linked to EMB differences.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What is the coal slurry pipeline bill (H.R. 4370) designed to do and why is it controversial?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"H.R. 4370 is designed to facilitate acquisition of rights-of-way by private coal carriers for new pipelines across federal and private lands. The report notes controversy due to potential water-supply effects, competition with railroads, environmental impacts of pipeline routings, and eminent-domain authority over private lands.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},322991,1790097024,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},1374391974564,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/14000253aa45c000a9e?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1779874745381141002","Report No.32  \nDecember 21,1979  \n96th Congress  \nlst Session  \nOn December 21,the Congress went into pro forma sessions unti1 \"business-as-usua1\"work is resumed in the Second Session on January 22,1980.Under this procedure,theCongress is not officially in recess or adjournment.  \n## ENERGY POLICY\n\nThe first session of the 96th Congress ended with the three major pleces of energylegislation still under debate in conference committees.The Senate finally managed tobreak a filibuster and move the windfall profits tax bill to conference.The fate of thevarious tax expenditures accepted by the Senate,including the package of renewableenergy and energy conservation incentives authored by Oregon Sen.Bob Packwood,is st111in doubt.The House bill does not contain sim1lar provisions,and some House confereesappeared unenthusiastic about some of them.House and Senate/conferees w111 meet againon January 17.  \nThe conference on the Energy Mobilization Board (EMB)was making slow progress inresolving differences between the two bills.Offers and counter-offers on the waiver oflaw issue were considered in the last few days of the session,but no agreement wasreached,A number of significant issues,such as limitations on NEPA,have not yet comeup in the conference.  \nThe conference to resolve differences between the House and Senate synthetic fuelscommercialization program agreed to establ1shing a quas1-independent corporation,andaccepting some of the House language to allow use of Defense Production Act (DPA)authorities in the interim.The extent of the authority which should be granted underthe DPA bogged down the conference and staff was trying to work out a compromise whenthe session ended.  Some of the powers the Senate b111 grants the Synthetic FuelsCorporation also are expected to be controversial,and some observers expect a lengthyconference.  \nNo conference sessons on either the EMB or the synfuels bills have been scheduledbefore the House and Senate return January 22.  \n## ENERGY--Coal Slurry Pipelines\n\nOn December 7,the House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs issued afavorable report on H.R.4370,the \"Coal Pipeline Act of 1979\"。The House Committee onPublic Works,to which the bi11 had aleo been referred,held hearings earl1er this year,but thus far has not marked it up.As reported by the Interior Commlttee,H.R.4370 isdesigned to facilitate acqulsition of rights-of-way by private coal carriers for newpipelines across federal and private lands.Coal slurry pipelines move finely groundcoal mixed with water from mines to markets.The process is highly controversial due topotential effects on water supplies and competition with railroads,as wel1 asenvironmental impacts of pipeline routings and the authority of eminent domain overprivate lands.  \n## FISHERIES\n\nA bill,H.R.6074,to expand the Federal Aid in Sport Fishery Restoration Act(theso-called Dingel1-Johnson Act),has been introduced by three prominent House members:John B。Breaux (La.),cha1rman of the Fisheries,Wild1ife Conservation and theEnvironment Subcommittee;John M.Murphy(N.Y.),chairman of the Committee on MerchantMarine and Fisheries;and Bob Eckhardt(Tex.).  The bil1,similar to S.1631 (see ReportNo.21,p.2),was referred jointly to the Committees on Merchant Marine and Fisheries andWays and Mean.  Like s.1631,H.R.60741s intended to expand state sport fisheriesprograms by extending federal excise taxes financing the Fish Restoration Fund to  \nTHISIS AEREESERVICE TOASO  \nadditiona1 items of outdoor recreational equipment.Hearings are expected to bescheduled in early 1980.  \n## FISH AND WILDLIFE\n\nOn December 10,the following bills dealing with fish and wild11fe were passed bythe House:  \n---H.R。4889,which extends the author1zation period for the Great Diemal SwampNational Wildlife Refuge in Virginia and North Carolina unti1 September 30,1983.The extenlon had been recommended by the Committee on Merchant Marineand Fisheries due to delays in land acquisition.  \n---H.R。4887,which increases b","cbCaig4WwkCoFNlu","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaig4WwkCoFNlu","pdf",1301377,"English","# ENERGY POLICY\n## ENERGY--Coal Slurry Pipelines\n# FISHERIES\n# FISH AND WILDLIFE\n# LAND USE","[{\"question\":\"What does the report state about the Congress’s session status on December 21, 1979?\",\"answer\":\"It states Congress went into pro forma sessions until “business-as-usual” work resumed in the Second Session on January 22, 1980, and that the Congress is not officially in recess or adjournment under this procedure.\"},{\"question\":\"What major energy legislation items were still under debate at the end of the first session?\",\"answer\":\"The report highlights three major energy pieces still under debate in conference committees: the windfall profits tax bill, the fate of various tax expenditures including renewable-energy and energy conservation incentives, and conference negotiations linked to EMB differences.\"},{\"question\":\"What is the coal slurry pipeline bill (H.R. 4370) designed to do and why is it controversial?\",\"answer\":\"H.R. 4370 is designed to facilitate acquisition of rights-of-way by private coal carriers for new pipelines across federal and private lands. The report notes controversy due to potential water-supply effects, competition with railroads, environmental impacts of pipeline routings, and eminent-domain authority over private lands.\"}]","Report No.32 - Energy Policy - 1979 | PDF",1789964068,13]