[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-583361-105":59,"doc-detail-583361-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","reimagining-learning-for-the-age-of-ai-april-2026","REIMAGINING LEARNING FOR THE AGE OF AI - April 2026","","A compendium exploring how AI should shape education without reinforcing outdated schooling models. It challenges leaders to focus on purpose, relationships, equity, and coherent design rather than only tools and workflows. The statements surface tradeoffs such as efficiency versus purposeful learning and automation versus human connection. Contributors model how values can translate into priorities for piloting, regulating, and discontinuing AI use while measuring learning beyond speed and output.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/reimagining-learning-for-the-age-of-ai-april-2026/583361/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/reimagining-learning-for-the-age-of-ai-april-2026/583361.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jake","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-10","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":14},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What central question guides the compendium’s vision statements?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Whether AI will reinforce existing models of schooling or help build learning environments centered on purpose, relationships, and real-world contributions.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How do the statements shift attention away from common AI discussions?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"They move the focus from tools and workflows to the ends and design of learning experiences, asking what schooling should protect and how to define and measure success.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What recurring values do the authors emphasize across contributions?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Strong foundational knowledge, teacher judgment, public purpose, equity, and the centrality of human relationships are treated as design principles for systems that last.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},583361,1792046899,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":14,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","REIMAGINING LEARNING FOR THE AGE OF AI  \nAPRIL 2026  \nREIMAGINING LEARNING FOR THE AGE OF AI  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \n3  \n5  \n9  \n13  \n18  \n22  \n26  \n30  \n33  \nIntroduction — Maddy Sims  \nExponential Human Purpose: A Model for the Future of AI in Education — Dacia Toll  \nQuality Over Quantity: Building Coherent AI for Reading and Math — Cameron White  \nAn AI Driver’s License for the Next Generation  \n— Mike Taubman  \nStarting with What It Means to Be Human  \n— Ila Deshmukh Towery  \nDesigning Coherent, AI-Powered Systems for Powerful Learning — D’Andre Weaver, PhD  \nAI in Education: A Support, Not a Substitute  \n— Adam Garry  \nDesigning High Schools for Mastery, Not Minutes  \n— Scott Bess  \nStrategic AI Integration: Keeping Humans at the Center  \n— Sunanna Chand  \nREIMAGINING LEARNING FOR THE AGE OF AI  \nREIMAGINING LEARNING FOR THE AGE OF AI  \nMADDY SIMS, CRPE  \nThe Center on Reinventing Public Education’s inaugural cohort of Think  Forward Fellows work in classrooms, research organizations, ed tech companies, and school-and system-facing partner organizations. They wrote the vision statements in this compendium to explore a central question:  \nWill AI reinforce existing models of schooling, or will it help us build learning environments that center purpose, relationships, and real-world contributions? We invite you to read these statements as provocations that name what matters, surface tradeoffs, and offer a north star for leaders who must decide how to use AI in the service of genuine learning.  \nConversations about AI often center on details like tools and workflows rather than major concerns like ends and purpose. That makes it easy to treat AI asa feature set to be adopted, tweaked, and scaled instead of an accelerant for deeper systems change. These vision statements push back. They provoke the field to ask different questions: What should schooling protect when intelligence becomes ubiquitous? What are the skills that only humans can have, and how should schooling develop them? How do we measure success when speed and output are no longer sufficient proxies for learning?  \nAs a collection, these statements…  \n1. Surface tradeoffs. Fellows name concrete tradeoffs: efficiency versus purposeful learning, automation versus relationship, novelty versus coherence. By making these tradeoffs explicit, our authors help leaders make informed decisions.  \n2. Recenter values. Across authors, you will see recurring commitments to strong foundational knowledge, teacher judgment, public purpose, equity, and the centrality of human relationships. These are not technical constraints; they are design principles for systems that last.  \n3. Model intent. At a time of rapid change, a clear north star helps systems decide what to pilot, what to regulate, and what to shelve. These statements show how leaders might translate values into actionable priorities.  \n3  \nREIMAGINING LEARNING FOR THE AGE OF AI  \nPATTERNS WORTH NOTING AND AN INVITATION  \nThese statements shift the conversation from tools and workflows to purpose and design. Rather than treating AI as something to adopt and scale, they ask what kinds of learning experiences we want to create and what role AI should play in supporting them.  \nAcross the collection, several themes emerge. Fellows consistently position AI as a tool to amplify, not replace, human relationships and judgment. They emphasize the importance of coherence across classroom practice, system design, and policy. They underscore equity, purpose, and strong learning experiences as essential and intentional design choices, not afterthoughts. CRPE’s white paper, Think Forward: Building a Coherent Approach to AI in  Education, further explores each of these ideas through its guiding principles for future-ready schooling.  \nWe invite you to read these statements as provocations, not prescriptions. We hope they help clarify what matters most and inspire you to develop a vision for how AI can support meaningful learning in yo","cbCailul9mtnaJcw","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailul9mtnaJcw","pdf",2437255,38,"English","# Introduction\n## Exponential Human Purpose: A Model for the Future of AI in Education\n## Quality Over Quantity: Building Coherent AI for Reading and Math\n## An AI Driver’s License for the Next Generation\n## Starting with What It Means to Be Human\n## Designing Coherent, AI-Powered Systems for Powerful Learning\n## AI in Education: A Support, Not a Substitute\n## Designing High Schools for Mastery, Not Minutes\n## Strategic AI Integration: Keeping Humans at the Center","[{\"question\":\"What central question guides the compendium’s vision statements?\",\"answer\":\"Whether AI will reinforce existing models of schooling or help build learning environments centered on purpose, relationships, and real-world contributions.\"},{\"question\":\"How do the statements shift attention away from common AI discussions?\",\"answer\":\"They move the focus from tools and workflows to the ends and design of learning experiences, asking what schooling should protect and how to define and measure success.\"},{\"question\":\"What recurring values do the authors emphasize across contributions?\",\"answer\":\"Strong foundational knowledge, teacher judgment, public purpose, equity, and the centrality of human relationships are treated as design principles for systems that last.\"}]","REIMAGINING LEARNING FOR THE AGE OF AI - April 2026 | PDF",96]