[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-587904-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-587904-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","regional-partnerships-evaluation-framework","Regional Partnerships Evaluation Framework","","Regional Partnerships Evaluation Framework outlines how the Washington Student Achievement Council measures partnership impact and population-level educational change. It connects community-led solutions to a North Star attainment target of 70 percent, defining evidence, equity, and evaluation architecture. The framework emphasizes ongoing learning, community participation in research, trust-building through embedded partnerships, and tracking both short- and long-term outcomes. It also details evidence infrastructure such as progress toward 70%, population-level measures, short-term outcomes, and outputs reported through progress reporting.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/regional-partnerships-evaluation-framework/587904/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/regional-partnerships-evaluation-framework/587904.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Bintang","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-31","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",5,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of the Regional Partnerships Evaluation Framework?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It shows how WSAC measures short- and long-term outcomes to capture partnership impact and population-level change from education and training initiatives after high school.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How does the framework define evidence?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Evidence includes learners’ and families’ stories (conversations, focus groups, surveys), quantitative reporting data, KPIs from ongoing initiatives, and collective feedback from partner organizations.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What does the framework track to evaluate impact?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It tracks population-level measures, partnership short-term outcomes unique to local contexts, and outputs from progress reports, supporting real-time monitoring alongside longer-term results.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},587904,1792910219,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":115,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},962085564381,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","Approach 1  \nNorth Star Goal 2 Evidence Infrastructure 3 Case Study 4  \nOutcome Themes 7 Conclusion 8  \nWSAC Regional Partnerships Evaluation Framework  \nCo-authored by  \nHannah Lodwick, Associate Director of Strategy & Partnerships KC Deane, Associate Director of Research & Program Evaluation  \nEvaluation architecture by  \nKC Deane, Associate Director of Research & Program Evaluation  \nRegional Partnerships Evaluation Framework Approach  \nCommunity-led solutions to educational challenges can and will sustainably increase the number of Washingtonians with education and training after high school. This framework demonstrates how we measure short-and long-term outcomes to capture partnership impact and population-level change.  \nRegional Challenge Grant is committed to uplifting stories and evidence that highlight the assets inherently present within communities and regions. We support partners as they work towards developing and implementing practices, activities, and approaches that will change systems and lived realities in their communities. We demonstrate our commitment to evaluating regional partnerships in the following ways:  \n1 Lead with evidence-based strategies that center learners and families.  \n2 Invite communities to partner in the research process.  \n3 Center relationship and trust building between WSAC as a state agency with community-embedded partnerships.  \n4 Measure both short-and long-term outcomes to capture partnership impact alongside population-level changes. (More on page 3)  \n5 Engage in partnership-to-partnership relationship building to de-silo learning from community-centered work through a community of practice.ii  \nOur reporting goal is to amplify the power of a regional approach to advancing educational attainment. When we are effective in doing so, we can also demonstrate the value of continued investment in the Regional Challenge Grant as a program and in the specific partnerships in which we invest.  \nii RCG Legislative Report  \n1 — Washington Student Achievement Council  \nPhoto by Allison Shelley/  \nComplete College Photo Library  \nRegional Partnerships Evaluation Framework North Star Goal: 70 Percent Attainment  \nWSAC’s plan to achieve 70 percent statewide attainment relies on community solutions. The Regional Challenge Grant (RCG) is a key mechanism in WSAC’s broader Regional Partnership (RP) approach to invest in partnerships that identify strategies to drive change to targeted populations in their local communities. RP elevates place-based approaches as a meaningful strategy for creating an educational system that works to help all learners succeed. The approaches funded by RP are built for and by local partnership networks because those closest to and most impacted by inequitable systems are best positioned to identify and implement what will prove effective in their communities.  \nWe cannot wait for long-term results to conclude whether regional partnerships work. Students, families, and their communities benefit from an approach to evaluation grounded in ongoing learning into how partnership work affects community change for Washingtonians. By constantly learning from and about the communities in regions served by regional partnerships, we create a feedback loop that prioritizes local knowledge and shared leadership.  \nDefinitions  \nEvidence  \nRegional Partnerships takes a broad view of what constitutes evidence. Included in this definition are learners’ and families’ stories—shared through conversations, focus groups, or surveys; quantitative data captured through reporting; Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) developed as part of ongoing initiatives in which the partnership is invested; and partner organizations’ collective feedback as they support each other and the community.  \ni 2026 Strategic Action Plan  \n2 — Washington Student Achievement Council  \nEquity  \nWSAC defines equity as an outcome in which justice is realized within our society. This happens through a continuous, intent","cbCaiuLsMk2pR4m7","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuLsMk2pR4m7","pdf",2385409,"English","# Approach\n## North Star Goal 2 Evidence Infrastructure 3 Case Study 4\n## Outcome Themes 7 Conclusion 8\n# Definitions\n## Evidence\n## Equity\n# Evidence Infrastructure\n## Progress Toward 70%\n## Population-Level Measures\n## Short-Term Outcomes\n## Outputs","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the Regional Partnerships Evaluation Framework?\",\"answer\":\"It shows how WSAC measures short- and long-term outcomes to capture partnership impact and population-level change from education and training initiatives after high school.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the framework define evidence?\",\"answer\":\"Evidence includes learners’ and families’ stories (conversations, focus groups, surveys), quantitative reporting data, KPIs from ongoing initiatives, and collective feedback from partner organizations.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the framework track to evaluate impact?\",\"answer\":\"It tracks population-level measures, partnership short-term outcomes unique to local contexts, and outputs from progress reports, supporting real-time monitoring alongside longer-term results.\"}]","Regional Partnerships Evaluation Framework | PDF",1792063645,23]