[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-324529-105":59,"doc-detail-324529-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","referendumkey-prolonged-shouts-for-the-resignation-of-the-src-executive","REFERENDUM!KEY - Prolonged Shouts for the Resignation of the SRC Executive","","A tense SRC Council meeting concludes with a motion of confidence being taken to a university-wide referendum. The executive is defeated after its handling of a sit-in, yet pushes a procedural route to force a broader vote. Nearly a hundred council members and students gather in Trinity hall, where disputes escalate between executive representatives and sit-in supporters, including technical objections, speeches, heckling, and contested claims about the sit-in’s purpose and the executive’s actions.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/referendumkey-prolonged-shouts-for-the-resignation-of-the-src-executive/324529/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/referendumkey-prolonged-shouts-for-the-resignation-of-the-src-executive/324529.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Olivia Brown","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-07","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":52},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Why was the SRC Executive defeated at the meeting?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It was defeated on a motion of confidence over its handling of the sit-in.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What change did the executive attempt at the end of the meeting?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It pushed a procedural motion to take the motion of confidence to a university-wide referendum.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How did the council decide regarding the motion of confidence and the referendum?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The confidence motion was defeated in Council, and the referendum proposal was then put to a vote, with Council sending the motion of confidence to a referendum.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},324529,1790863675,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":52,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":14,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":24,"preview_page_count":4},16904993612988,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","teewel  \nREFERENDUM!KEY  \n\n| PROLONGED SHOUTS for the resignation of the SRC Executive concluded a long and tense meeting of  \u003Cbr>SRC Council yesterday afternoon.The Executive had been defeated on a motion of confidence in its hand-  \u003Cbr>ling of the sit-in,but had pushed through without discussion in the last minutes of the meeting a proceed-  \u003Cbr>ural motion to take the motion of confidence to a university-wide referendum.  \u003Cbr>Nearly a hundred members of council and many other students packed into Trinity hall for the two and a  \u003Cbr>half hour meeting.The battle between Mike Sullivan and his executive,sitting on high table,and a large con-  \u003Cbr>tingent from the sit-in clustered around the doors at the back,began with mocking acrimony.A technical  \u003Cbr>objection to the cooption of Graham Kent on to the Executive,on the grounds that Magdalen MCR had not  \u003Cbr>voted him their Council rep.prevented him from taking up one of the vacancies created by the many resig-  \u003Cbr>nations from the executive duringthe week.The ratification of Francis Jones'appointment was marked by  \u003Cbr>widespread abstentions which seemed to portend a short life for the executise as a whole.  \u003Cbr>A motion of confidence in the Executive and its   |  |\n| --- | --- |\n| THE BULLDOG  \u003Cbr>opposite Town Hall  \u003Cbr>St.ALDATES  \u003Cbr>HOT &COLD Snacks,  \u003Cbr>Toasted Sandwiches,  \u003Cbr>Pizzas,  \u003Cbr>Coffee  \u003Cbr>COURAGE BEERS  \u003Cbr>Doubles 30p.   | handling of the crisis was then proposed by Hector  \u003Cbr>Smith,JCR President of St John's,in a prepared speach  \u003Cbr>which was punctuated with vigorous heckling.Smith  \u003Cbr>argued theifamiliar case that the sit-in has bee in  \u003Cbr>contradiction to the decision of Monday's Open Meet-  \u003Cbr>ing.and that for students such as himself w ho favour-  \u003Cbr>lrSI                 n1,·  \u003Cbr>had been right to oppose it and he claimed that many  \u003Cbr>JCRs reflected the executive view.  \u003Cbr>Tony Dodd spoke tor an amendment condemning  \u003Cbr>the action of the executive in opposmg tie sit-in and  \u003Cbr>instructing it to resign.Dodd justified the sit-in by  \u003Cbr>saying that the campaign for a CSU had got beyond  \u003Cbr>the stage of negotiation.'We went into Schools be-  \u003Cbr>cause we had no other way of getting a CSU'Mon  \u003Cbr>day's Open Meeting had not discussed  \u003Cbr>so it could not be said to have opposed it He arguedl  \u003Cbr>that the support anng students for the sit-in was  \u003Cbr>far greater than any numhe of v   st tot all,mem·  \u003Cbr>ber of tlic present executiv.whon re slanmed it  \u003Cbr>aking statements and presuming to make policy with  \u003Cbr>out consulting Council or Open Meeting.and who had  \u003Cbr>danaged SRC by allowing it to become isolated fron  \u003Cbr>the mass of students.  \u003Cbr>In reply,Alan Griffiths for the executive clamed  \u003Cbr>that the speaches made at Monday's meeting showed  \u003Cbr>clearly that there was overwhelming opposition to  \u003Cbr>the sit-in.He repeated that it was a disastrous tactic  \u003Cbr>for gaining a CSU.and impressed upon Council that  \u003Cbr>for the executive to have supported the occupation  \u003Cbr>would have been to sacrifice ihe University's recoj-  \u003Cbr>nition of SRC based upon a constitution which en-  \u003Cbr>sured the dermocratic representation of student op-  \u003Cbr>inion in Oxford.Grffith's speach enaled in noisy  \u003Cbr>accusations being flung around the hall,with  \u003Cbr>Sullivan banging the table again and again for order.  \u003Cbr>Griffiths accused Dodd of having completely changed  \u003Cbr>his position since a week ago when,according to  \u003Cbr>Giffiths,Dodd had accompanied him,Sullivan,and  \u003Cbr>Mike Perham.SRC Seeretary,to a meeting to discuss  \u003Cbr>with the Proctors how a sit-in could be avoided.  \u003Cbr>During the rest of the debate Phil Motiano of Balliol,  \u003Cbr>and Simon White of Magdalen striongle condemned  \u003Cbr>the personal animus that had been created.Both stress-  \u003Cbr>ed the great success of the sit-in in generating student  \u003Cbr>support and showing what faclities a CSU could pro-  \u003Cbr>videThe executive's position was not only fatuous  \u003Cbr>in that it failed to recognise th","cbCaioyGJ1rr1iXs","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaioyGJ1rr1iXs","pdf",1139802,"English","# REFERENDUM!KEY\n## Meeting background and procedural motion\n## Debate, objections, and competing arguments\n## Votes on amendment and confidence motion\n## Referendum proposal and final council decision","[{\"question\":\"Why was the SRC Executive defeated at the meeting?\",\"answer\":\"It was defeated on a motion of confidence over its handling of the sit-in.\"},{\"question\":\"What change did the executive attempt at the end of the meeting?\",\"answer\":\"It pushed a procedural motion to take the motion of confidence to a university-wide referendum.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the council decide regarding the motion of confidence and the referendum?\",\"answer\":\"The confidence motion was defeated in Council, and the referendum proposal was then put to a vote, with Council sending the motion of confidence to a referendum.\"}]","REFERENDUM!KEY - Prolonged Shouts for the Resignation of the SRC Executive | PDF",1789968169]