[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-182200-105":59,"doc-detail-182200-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","recipient-housing-in-the-housing-voucher-and-certificate-programs-may-1990-report","Recipient Housing - in the Housing Voucher and Certificate Programs - May 1990 Report","","Recipient Housing analyzes how housing assistance operates across the Housing Voucher and Certificate Programs, focusing on rent outcomes for program recipients and comparing overall differences in recipient housing. The study evaluates recipient rents, housing quality, and price differences using hedonic indices and a rental cost function methodology. It details housing characteristics such as living space, unit condition, building amenities, and neighborhoods, supported by demonstration samples and inspection and census-based data sources.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/recipient-housing-in-the-housing-voucher-and-certificate-programs-may-1990-report/182200/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/recipient-housing-in-the-housing-voucher-and-certificate-programs-may-1990-report/182200.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Lucas Vance","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-20","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":52},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the main focus of this report on recipient housing?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The report compares recipient housing outcomes across the Housing Voucher and Certificate Programs, with emphasis on recipient rents and overall differences in housing characteristics and quality.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the report analyze differences between the two programs?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It uses hedonic indices to assess price differences, along with a rental cost function methodology to examine how housing costs relate to observed attributes and program conditions.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What housing aspects are examined in the detailed comparison?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The report evaluates living space, unit condition (including evaluator and recipient ratings), building characteristics and amenities, and neighborhood attributes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},182200,1788347598,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":52,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},549768064622,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","# Recipient Housing\n\nin the Housing Voucherand CertificatePrograms  \n# Recipient Housing in the Housing Voucherand Certificate Programs\n\nPrepared for:  \nU.S.Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopmentOffice of Policy Development and Research  \nPrepared by:  \nMireille L.LegerStephen D.Kennedy  \nAbt Associates,Inc.Cambridge,MA  \nContract HC-5716  \nMay 1990  \nThis report was produced by Abt Associates,Inc.for the United States Department ofHousing and Urban Development.The views and conclusions contained herein are thoseof the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official viewsor policies of the United States Government.  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \nTable of Contents………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i  \nList of Tables and Figures…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………iii  \nAcknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………vii  \nEXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1  \nCHAPTER ONE- INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7  \nCHAPTER TWO- RECIPIENT RENTS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………17  \n2.1 The Two Programs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………17  \n2.2 Recipient Rents…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………24  \nCHAPTER THREE - OVERALL DIFFERENCES IN RECIPIENT HOUSING……………………………33  \n3.1 Overal1 Differences in Recipient Housing(Hedonic Indices)…………………35  \n3.2 Further Examination of Price Differences in the Two Programs…………40  \n3.3 The Rental Cost Function Methodology…52  \nCHAPTER FOUR- DETAILS OF HOUSING IN THE TWO PROGRAMS…………………………………………………57  \n4.1 Living Space…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………58  \n4.2 Unit Condition………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………58  \n4.2.1 Rating of Units by Evaluators………………………………………………………62  \n4.2.2 Rating of Units by Recipients………………………………………………………………………………69  \n4.2.3 Rating of Units by an Index of Housing Adequacy……………………………71  \n4.3 Characteristics of Buildings and Presence of Amenities…………………………79  \n4.4 Neighborhoods…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………79  \nReferences……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………99  \nAPPENDIX A- THE DEMONSTRATION SAMPLE………………………………………………………………………………………101  \nA.1 The Sample of PHAs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………101  \nA.2 Properties of the Bryant/Hartley/Jessen Procedure……………………………………103  \nA.3 Sampling Households…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………107  \nA.4 The Housing Evaluation Sample…………………………………………………………………………………………111  \nA.4.1 Selecting PHAs for Housing Evaluations…………………………………………………111  \nA.4.2 Samples of Recipients within PHAs………………………………………………………………112  \n,  \n## TABLEonE noeTENTS\n\nAPPENDIX B- DATA SOURCES AND DEFINITIONS………………………………………119  \nB.1 Data from Demonstration Forms Submitted by PHAs…………………………………………119  \nB.2 Housing Inspections…………………………………………………………………………………………………………126  \nB.3 Census Tract Coding and Data Collection…………………………………………………………………128  \nSupplement to Appendix C: Housing Evaluation Form…………………131  \nAPPENDIX C- BASIC ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY………………………………………………………………………………159  \nC.1 National Projections……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………159  \nC.2 Estimate for Demographic Groups………………………………………………………………………………………177  \nAPPENDIX D- THEORETICAL DIFFERENCES IN SHOPPING BEHAVIOR BETWEEN  \nTHE TWO PROGRAMS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………179  \nD.1 Theoretical Incentives of the Two Programs………………………………………………………179  \nD.2 Expected Differences in Behavior Under the Simple Model………………………188  \nD.3 Extending the Model to Take Account of Program Requirements………195  \nD.4 Extending the Model to Take Account of Stochastic Prices………………201  \nD.5 Some Caveats………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………213  \nAPPENDIX E- HEDONIC INDICES AND OTHER MEASURES OF HOUSING QUALITY…217  \nE.1 Alternative Measures of Housing……………………………………………………………………………………217  \nE.2 Specification of the Hedonic Index………………………………………………………………………………227  \nE.2.1 AIternative Data Sources………………………………………………………………","cbCaio3VCvDtdsLr","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaio3VCvDtdsLr","pdf",18578672,408,"English","# Executive Summary\n# Chapter One - Introduction\n# Chapter Two - Recipient Rents\n## 2.1 The Two Programs\n## 2.2 Recipient Rents\n# Chapter Three - Overall Differences in Recipient Housing\n## 3.1 Overal1 Differences in Recipient Housing (Hedonic Indices)\n## 3.2 Further Examination of Price Differences in the Two Programs\n## 3.3 The Rental Cost Function Methodology\n# Chapter Four - Details of Housing in the Two Programs\n## 4.1 Living Space\n## 4.2 Unit Condition\n## 4.3 Characteristics of Buildings and Presence of Amenities\n## 4.4 Neighborhoods\n# References\n# Appendix A - The Demonstration Sample\n# Appendix B - Data Sources and Definitions\n# Appendix C - Basic Estimation Methodology\n# Appendix D - Theoretical Differences in Shopping Behavior Between the Two Programs\n# Appendix E - Hedonic Indices and Other Measures of Housing Quality\n# Appendix F - Supplementary Tables","[{\"question\":\"What is the main focus of this report on recipient housing?\",\"answer\":\"The report compares recipient housing outcomes across the Housing Voucher and Certificate Programs, with emphasis on recipient rents and overall differences in housing characteristics and quality.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the report analyze differences between the two programs?\",\"answer\":\"It uses hedonic indices to assess price differences, along with a rental cost function methodology to examine how housing costs relate to observed attributes and program conditions.\"},{\"question\":\"What housing aspects are examined in the detailed comparison?\",\"answer\":\"The report evaluates living space, unit condition (including evaluator and recipient ratings), building characteristics and amenities, and neighborhood attributes.\"}]","Recipient Housing - in the Housing Voucher and Certificate Programs - May 1990 Report | PDF",1028]