[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-591559-105":59,"doc-detail-591559-en":122},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":115,"head_meta":117,"extra_data":119,"updated_unix":121},105,"en","reason-and-rationalization-a-theory-of-modern-plays","Reason and Rationalization - A Theory of Modern Plays","","Thomas S. Henricks reviews historical attempts, largely by European thinkers, to explain modernity and its relation to play, building toward a theory of play in the modern world. Drawing especially on Max Weber’s rationalization and its role in expressive culture, the author argues that play is broader than childhood education or mammalian development tools. Instead, play is grounded in “emotional destinations,” with attention to less commonly studied forms such as professional sports and official festivals.",{"@graph":69,"@context":114},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":15,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/reason-and-rationalization-a-theory-of-modern-plays/591559/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/reason-and-rationalization-a-theory-of-modern-plays/591559.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"supergirl","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":14},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What kinds of play receive special attention beyond common play studies?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The author looks at forms often not emphasized in play studies, including professional sports and official festivals, and argues that play is both biological and an essential social activity.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":116,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":118,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":120,"site_id":62},591559,1792727139,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":123},{"doc_id":120,"user_id":124,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":125,"doc_module":4,"category_id":14,"category_name":15,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":126,"file_id":127,"file_url":128,"file_type":129,"file_size":130,"view_count":14,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":131,"language":132,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":133,"faqs":134,"seo_title":135,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":136,"read_time":137},962088121634,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","Reason and Rationalization  \nA Theory of Modern Plays  \nThomas S. Henricks  \n􀂊e author reviews historical attempts—mostly by European thinkers—to characterize modernity and its relationship to play. He discusses ideas from Friederich Schiller to Brian Sutton-Smith, all to set the ground for a theory of play in the modern world. Emphasizing the ideas of Max Weber—in particular his theory of rationalization and its importance for expressive culture—the author explores the value of rationality to a theory of play. He de􀂋nes play more broadly than as a pastime and learning aid for children or a rough-and-tumble developmental tool in the evolution of mammals. Instead, he bases it more squarely on his concept of “emotional destinations.” In the process, he looks at kinds of play not o􀂌en considered in play studies, such as professional sports and o􀂍cial festivals, and  \n􀂋nds play not just a ubiquitous biological phenomena but also an essential social activity. Keywords: emotional destinations; Max Weber; modernity; play and the modern world; rationalization  \nCan we characterize the modern world—at least the versions that were created by European societies during the Renaissance and that have continued to develop over several centuries? To be sure, many scholars have attempted to make such a characterization (Kahler 1956; Nisbet 1966; Berman 1982; Tarnas 1991; Wagner 1994) . And the in$uential sociologist Max Weber, who identi-􀂋ed a profound shi􀂌 in the way people organize their lives, o%ered one of the greatest attempts.  \nWeber saw in the modernizing of the West a process of rationalization, an increasingly systematic and calculating approach to thought and behavior (Weber 1958c; 1964). Individuals in their daily habits express this more hesitant, re$ective approach, and so do social groups and cultures. Many of society’s important institutions—economic, political, scienti􀂋c, educational, and legal—exhibit essentially this same pattern, in which people focus on speci􀂋c goals and ascertain the best practices, or means, for achieving them. Ways of behaving become strategies that are continually evaluated and revised; and human invention—and intervention—replaces godly design. Weber remained uncertain  \n287  \nAmerican Journal of Play, volume 8, number 3 © 􀂊e Strong Contact 􀂊omas S. Henricks [at henricks@elon.edu](at henricks@elon.edu)  \nwhether this goal-oriented, calculating approach would transform a so􀂌er, more expressive social life—areas involving sex, love, family, art, and play. Would these also become organized in regimented, technically focused ways? Or would they maintain their traditional functions as counterbalances—and points of resistance—to o􀂍cially sponsored practices in politics, economics, and education?  \nI want to revisit Weber’s thesis as it pertains to current notions about play. In this context, I describe Weber’s theory of rationalization, including his understanding of its dangers and its implications for expressive culture. Next, I present the contributions of some classic play theorists who explore the role of rationality in play. Some of these theorists tout the value of rational control. Others champion disorderly thought and sensuality. My discussion focuses on the three levels of rationality that Weber identi􀂋ed: individual, social, and cultural. Finally, I attempt to provide a general theory of how rationality operates in contemporary play. For this purpose, I develop the concept of “emotional destinations,” which I hold serve as end-points of rational calculation.  \nReason, Rationalization, and Weber  \nWeber, considered by some the last “universal genius of the social sciences”(Wrong 1970, 1), made signi􀂋cant contributions to studies in history, politics, economics, religion, education, and law. He remains especially important in sociology where scholars recognize him as a key 􀂋gure in the development of their discipline. Born in 1864 and dying in 1920, he lived during a period when Germany was unitin","cbCailnRHjq9gQWP","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailnRHjq9gQWP","pdf",380768,38,"English","# Reason and Rationalization and Weber\n## Characterizing modernity\n## Rationalization and its social effects\n## Revisiting Weber’s thesis on play\n# Emotional destinations and a theory of play\n## Three levels of rationality","[{\"question\":\"What kinds of play receive special attention beyond common play studies?\",\"answer\":\"The author looks at forms often not emphasized in play studies, including professional sports and official festivals, and argues that play is both biological and an essential social activity.\"}]","Reason and Rationalization - A Theory of Modern Plays | PDF",1792072725,59]