[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33650-en":3,"doc-seo-33650-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33650,687197207639,"Asher","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd",2,"Literature","Readings in Philosophical Analysis","Selections curated for intermediate and advanced courses in modern philosophical analysis, addressing the need for accessible, worthwhile readings. The editors compile articles from periodical literature through consultations with about ninety philosophy teachers in the U.S. and England, using endorsements, rejections, and added recommendations. Inclusion emphasizes clarity, pertinence, incisiveness, intelligibility without excessive technicality, and integration into the anthology’s overall pattern, drawing from Cambridge analysis, Vienna Circle logical positivism, and related scientific empiricism, realism, pragmatism, and Polish logic.","","cbCairpT16nK5tjj","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairpT16nK5tjj","pdf",68704872,1,634,"English","en",105,"# Preface\n## Acknowledgements","[{\"question\":\"What purpose does the anthology serve for philosophy teaching?\",\"answer\":\"To provide readily accessible, worthwhile reading material for intermediate and advanced courses or seminars in modern philosophical analysis.\"},{\"question\":\"How were the selection choices made?\",\"answer\":\"The editors gathered responses from about ninety philosophy teachers through a circular letter, using endorsements, rejections, and recommendations to shape the final set of reprinted articles.\"},{\"question\":\"What criteria guided which articles were included?\",\"answer\":\"Didactic effectiveness was prioritized, especially clarity, pertinence, incisiveness, understandability without overly technical dependence, and how well each selection fits the anthology’s overall structure.\"}]",1782213907,976,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":27},"readings-in-philosophical-analysis",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,51,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/readings-in-philosophical-analysis/33650/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-01","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What purpose does the anthology serve for philosophy teaching?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"To provide readily accessible, worthwhile reading material for intermediate and advanced courses or seminars in modern philosophical analysis.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How were the selection choices made?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"The editors gathered responses from about ninety philosophy teachers through a circular letter, using endorsements, rejections, and recommendations to shape the final set of reprinted articles.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What criteria guided which articles were included?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"Didactic effectiveness was prioritized, especially clarity, pertinence, incisiveness, understandability without overly technical dependence, and how well each selection fits the anthology’s overall structure.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]