[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-596700-105":59,"doc-detail-596700-en":129},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":122,"head_meta":124,"extra_data":126,"updated_unix":128},105,"en","quantifying-interprofessional-learning-in-health-professional-programs-the-university-of-manitoba-experience","Quantifying Interprofessional Learning In Health Professional Programs - The University of Manitoba Experience","","Internationally, a growing number of interprofessional education (IPE) offices are being established within academic institutions, yet few apply educational improvement methodologies to evaluate and enhance interprofessional (IP) learning opportunities. The University of Manitoba IPE Initiative, founded in 2008 for pre-licensure learners, investigates changes in the number and attributes of IP learning opportunities across 2008–2009 versus 2011–2012. Using the Points for Interprofessional Scoring (PIPES) tool, the study reports a marked rise in high-scoring opportunities in 2012 and introduces PIPES as an improvement strategy and predictor of collaborative competence.",{"@graph":69,"@context":121},[70,84,104],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/quantifying-interprofessional-learning-in-health-professional-programs-the-university-of-manitoba-experience/596700/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":98,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":99,"interactionStatistic":100},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/quantifying-interprofessional-learning-in-health-professional-programs-the-university-of-manitoba-experience/596700.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Muffet","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":101,"interactionType":102,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":103},"ViewAction",{"@type":105,"mainEntity":106},"FAQPage",[107,113,117],{"name":108,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":110},"What does the study aim to measure about interprofessional learning opportunities?","Question",{"text":111,"@type":112},"It examines changes in both the number and attributes of interprofessional (IP) learning opportunities over the specified academic years.","Answer",{"name":114,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":115},"How were the IP learning opportunities quantified?",{"text":116,"@type":112},"The study used the Points for Interprofessional Scoring (PIPES) tool to quantify the attributes of each IP learning opportunity.",{"name":118,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":119},"What key change in outcomes is reported between 2009 and 2012?",{"text":120,"@type":112},"In 2012, eight of 11 IP learning opportunities achieved the highest PIPES score (>55), compared with four of 11 in 2009.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":123,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":125,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":127,"site_id":62},596700,1792083552,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":130},{"doc_id":127,"user_id":131,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":132,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":133,"file_id":134,"file_url":135,"file_type":136,"file_size":137,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":138,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":128,"read_time":143},962090768927,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","CSSHE  \nSCÉES  \nCanadian Journal of Higher Education Revue canadienne d’enseignement supérieur Volume 46, No. 4, 2016, pages 94-114  \nQuantifying Interprofessional Learning In Health Professional Programs: The University of Manitoba Experience  \nRuby E. Grymonpre, Heather J. Dean, Pamela F. Wener, A. Elizabeth Ready, Laura L. MacDonald, Maxine E. Holmqvist, and Moni W. Fricke  \nUniversity of Manitoba  \nMaria James  \nManitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Development  \nAbstract  \nInternationally, a growing number of interprofessional education (IPE) offices are being established within academic institutions. However, few are applying educational improvement methodologies to evaluate and improve the interprofessional (IP) learning opportunities offered. The University of Manitoba IPE Initiative was established in 2008 to facilitate the development of IP learning opportunities for pre-licensure learners. The research question for this secondary analysis was: what, if any, changes in the number and attributes of IP learning opportunities occurred in the academic year 2008–2009 compared to 2011–2012? The Points for Interprofessional Scoring (PIPES) tool was used to quantify the attributes of each IP learning opportunity. Most notably in 2012, eight (73%) of 11 IP learning opportunities achieved the highest PIPES score (> 55), compared to only four (36%) in 2009. The concept of the PIPES score is introduced as an educational improvement strategy and a potential predictor of achieving the desired educational outcome: collaborative competence.  \nCJHE / RCES Volume 46, No. 4, 2016  \nQuantifying Interprofessional Learning / R. E. Grymonpre, H. J. Dean, M. James, P. F. Wener,  \nA. E. Ready, L. L. MacDonald, M. E. Holmqvist, & M. W. Fricke  \n95  \nRésumé  \nLes institutions académiques du monde accueillent de plus en plus de bureauxd’éducation interprofessionnelle. Par contre, très peu mettent en pratique des méthodologies d’amélioration de l’enseignement pour évaluer et améliorer ces occasions d’apprentissage interprofessionnelles (OAI) . En 2008, afin defaciliter la création de telles occasions pour les apprenants avant l’obtention de leur permis de pratique, l’Université du Manitoba lançait l’initiative d’éducation interprofessionnelle. Ellevoulait savoir s’il existaitdes différences dans les nombres et les attributs des OAI entre les années 2008-2009 et 2011- 2012. Les attributs de chaque OAI ont été quantifiés en utilisant une version adaptée del’outil « Points for Interprofessional Scoring » ou (PIPEs) . En 2012 notamment, 73 % d’occasions d’apprentissage interprofessionnel (soit 8 sur 11) avait atteint le score PIPES (>55) le plus élevé, comparativement à 36 % en 2009. Le concept du score « PIPES » est présenté comme une stratégied’amélioration du secteur de l’éducation et comme un potentiel de prédiction du résultat éducationnel désiré : une compétence collaborative.  \nInterprofessional education (IPE) is an emerging global priority for educators in health professional programs. Evidence suggests that when health professionals are educated together and have knowledge of not only their own skills, but also the skills and attributes of other members of the healthcare team, and when these teams work together with the patient to decide on a course of treatment, the safety, quality, and access to care are better, and patient outcomes improve. Further, highly collaborative teams experience reduced tensions and conflict, leading to improved job satisfaction, recruitment, and retention among healthcare providers (Health Force Ontario, 2010; Reeves, Perrier, Goldman, Freeth, & Zwarenstein, 2013; Zwarenstein, Goldman, & Reeves, 2009) . However, as illustrated by the D’Amour Interprofessional Education for Collaborative Person-Centred Practice (IECPCP): Evolving Framework, structuring an IPE curriculum to achieve collaborative competence is complex and influenced by an array of political, regulatory, geographical, institutional, instructional, s","cbCair8L2YU7A9YA","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCair8L2YU7A9YA","pdf",235453,21,"English","# Quantifying Interprofessional Learning In Health Professional Programs\n## The University of Manitoba Experience","[{\"question\":\"What does the study aim to measure about interprofessional learning opportunities?\",\"answer\":\"It examines changes in both the number and attributes of interprofessional (IP) learning opportunities over the specified academic years.\"},{\"question\":\"How were the IP learning opportunities quantified?\",\"answer\":\"The study used the Points for Interprofessional Scoring (PIPES) tool to quantify the attributes of each IP learning opportunity.\"},{\"question\":\"What key change in outcomes is reported between 2009 and 2012?\",\"answer\":\"In 2012, eight of 11 IP learning opportunities achieved the highest PIPES score (\\u003e55), compared with four of 11 in 2009.\"}]","Quantifying Interprofessional Learning In Health Professional Programs - The University of Manitoba Experience | PDF",53]