[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-601949-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-601949-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","putting-teacher-evaluation-systems-on-the-map-an-overview-of-states-teacher-evaluation-systems-postevery-student-succeeds-act","Putting Teacher Evaluation Systems on the Map - An Overview of State’s Teacher Evaluation Systems Post–Every Student Succeeds Act","","The Every Students Succeeds Act (ESSA) loosened the federal policy grip over states’ teacher accountability systems. Survey evidence from state education personnel describes how all states’ teacher evaluation systems changed after ESSA and compares implementation before and after the act. Results show states reduced reliance on growth or value-added models (VAMs). Many states also expanded alternative approaches to connect student achievement with teacher effectiveness beyond test-score growth and strengthened language supporting formative teacher feedback, while enabling districts to design more unique systems despite challenges.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/putting-teacher-evaluation-systems-on-the-map-an-overview-of-states-teacher-evaluation-systems-postevery-student-succeeds-act/601949/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/putting-teacher-evaluation-systems-on-the-map-an-overview-of-states-teacher-evaluation-systems-postevery-student-succeeds-act/601949.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"CatatanPagi","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-20","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":30},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What does the study examine about teacher evaluation systems after ESSA?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"It presents information collected via surveys about all states’ teacher evaluation systems after ESSA and compares differences with the period before ESSA.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How did states’ use of growth or value-added models change after ESSA?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"States decreased their use of growth or value-added models (VAMs) within their teacher evaluation systems.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"What alternatives did many states offer besides using test score growth?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Many states offered more alternatives for measuring relationships between student achievement and teacher effectiveness, beyond using test score growth.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},601949,1792209467,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":30,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962090894170,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","SPECIAL ISSUE Policies and Practices of Promise  \nin Teacher Evaluation  \neducation policy analysis archives  \nA peer-reviewed, independent, open access, multilingual journal  \nArizona State University  \nVolume 28 Number 58 April 13 , 2020 ISSN 1068-2341  \nPutting Teacher Evaluation Systems on the Map: An Overview of State’s Teacher Evaluation Systems Post–Every Student Succeeds Act  \nKevin Close  \nAudrey Amrein-Beardsley  \n&  \nClarin Collins  \nArizona State University  \nUnited States  \nCitation: Close, K., Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Collins, C. (2020). Putting teacher evaluation systemson the map: An overview of state’s teacher evaluation systems post–Every Student Succeeds Act. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(58). [https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5252](https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5252) This article is part of the special issue, Policies and Practices of Promise in Teacher Evaluation, guest edited by Audrey AmreinBeardsley.  \nAbstract: The Every Students Succeeds Act (ESSA) loosened the federal policy grip overstates’ teacher accountability systems. We present information , collected via surveys sent to state department of education personnel, about all states’ teacher evaluation systems post–ESSA, while also highlighting differences before and after ESSA. We found that states have decreased their use of growth or value-added models (VAMs) within their teacher evaluation systems. In addition, many states are offering more alternatives for measuring the relationships between student achievement and teacher effectiveness  \nbesides using test score growth. State teacher evaluation plans also contain more language supporting formative teacher feedback. States are also allowing districts to develop and implement more unique teacher evaluation systems, while acknowledging challenges with states’ being able to support varied systems, as well as incomparable data across schools and districts in effect.  \nKeywords: education policy; accountability; teacher evaluation  \nMapeo de sistemas de evaluación de maestros: Una descripción general de los sistemas de evaluación de maestros del estado después de la Every Student Succeeds Act  \nResumen: La Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) aflojó el control de la política federal sobre los sistemas de accountability docente de los estados. Presentamos información, recopilada mediante encuestas enviadas al personal del departamento de educación del estado, sobre los sistemas de evaluación docente de todos los estados después de ESSA, al tiempo que destacamos las diferencias antes y después de ESSA. Descubrimos que los estados han disminuido su uso de modelos de crecimiento o de valor agregado (VAM) dentro de sus sistemas de evaluación docente. Además, muchos estados están ofreciendomás alternativas para medir las relaciones entre el rendimiento de los estudiantes y laefectividad de los maestros, además de usar el aumento en el puntaje de la prueba. Los planes estatales de evaluación de maestros también contienen más comentarios de apoyo formativos del maestro. Los estados también están permitiendo que los distritos desarrollen e implementen sistemas de evaluación de maestros más únicos, al tiempo que reconocen los desafíos con que los estados puedan apoyar sistemas variados, así como datos incomparables en las escuelas y distritos vigentes.  \nPalabras clave: política educativa; accountability; evaluación docente  \nMapeamento de sistemas de avaliação de professores: uma visão geral dos sistemasestaduais de avaliação de professores após a Every Student Succeeds Act Resumo: A Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) afrouxou o controle de políticas federais sobre os sistemas estaduais de accountability de professores. Apresentamos informações, compiladas por meio de pesquisas enviadas ao departamento de educação do estado, sobre sistemas de avaliação de professores em todos os estados após a ESSA, enquantodestacamos as diferenças antes e depois da ESSA. Descobrimos que os estados diminuíram o uso de","cbCaihjoTdOBbShO","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihjoTdOBbShO","pdf",758833,31,"English","# Policies and Practices of Promise in Teacher Evaluation\n## Mapeo de sistemas de evaluación de maestros: Una descripción general de los sistemas de evaluación de maestros del estado después de la Every Student Succeeds Act\n## Mapeamento de sistemas de avaliação de professores: uma visão geral dos sistemas estaduais de avaliação de professores após a Every Student Succeeds Act\n# The Policy Topography\n## Overview of state teacher evaluation systems after Race to the Top\n## Shift after the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)","[{\"question\":\"What does the study examine about teacher evaluation systems after ESSA?\",\"answer\":\"It presents information collected via surveys about all states’ teacher evaluation systems after ESSA and compares differences with the period before ESSA.\"},{\"question\":\"How did states’ use of growth or value-added models change after ESSA?\",\"answer\":\"States decreased their use of growth or value-added models (VAMs) within their teacher evaluation systems.\"},{\"question\":\"What alternatives did many states offer besides using test score growth?\",\"answer\":\"Many states offered more alternatives for measuring relationships between student achievement and teacher effectiveness, beyond using test score growth.\"}]","Putting Teacher Evaluation Systems on the Map - An Overview of State’s Teacher Evaluation Systems Post–Every Student Succeeds Act | PDF",1792093752,78]