[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31771":3,"doc-seo-31771":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31771,8796095461564,"Liam","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d",8,"Research & Report","Pulsed Radiofrequency of Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion for Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) targeting the lumbar dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is widely used for lumbar radicular pain (LRP), yet its clinical value compared with lumbar epidural injection (LEI) remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared PRF of lumbar DRG versus LEI, with or without steroids, using randomized controlled trials through May 2023. Ten RCTs (n=613) showed no clear pain or function benefits overall, with limited evidence of better pain relief at 3 months in selected subgroups.","cbCaifOWGLTA2NYh","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifOWGLTA2NYh","pdf",4669286,1,14,"English","en","# Abstract\n## Background\n## Methods\n## Results\n## Conclusions\n# Introduction\n# Methods","[{\"question\":\"What were the main findings about pain relief and functional improvement?\",\"answer\":\"Overall evidence quality was very low to moderate; there was no difference in pain at 1 and 6 months, and ODI showed no significant differences at any interval. Pain improved at 3 months in selected subgroups, while convincing functional improvement evidence was not found.\"}]",1780088552,35,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":76,"head_meta":78,"extra_data":80,"updated_unix":25},105,"pulsed-radiofrequency-of-lumbar-dorsal-root-ganglion-for-lumbar-radicular-pain-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis","",{"@graph":34,"@context":75},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/pulsed-radiofrequency-of-lumbar-dorsal-root-ganglion-for-lumbar-radicular-pain-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/31771/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-29",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What were the main findings about pain relief and functional improvement?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"Overall evidence quality was very low to moderate; there was no difference in pain at 1 and 6 months, and ODI showed no significant differences at any interval. Pain improved at 3 months in selected subgroups, while convincing functional improvement evidence was not found.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":77,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":79,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]