[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-140486-105":59,"doc-detail-140486-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","publication-ethics-instructions-for-authors","Publication Ethics - Instructions for Authors","","Publication Ethics and author instructions for the Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences (JIOS) define the ethical responsibilities across the publication process. It outlines editor duties for ensuring academic integrity, appropriate reviewer selection, revision decisions, confidentiality, and conflict-of-interest handling. Reviewer responsibilities cover double-blind peer review, timeliness, objective evaluation, source acknowledgment, similarity reporting, and protection of privileged information. Author duties address reporting standards, data access and retention, originality and plagiarism prevention, proper source citation, avoidance of redundant or concurrent publication, and criteria for responsible authorship.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/publication-ethics-instructions-for-authors/140486/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/publication-ethics-instructions-for-authors/140486.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Ezra","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-14","2026-08-24",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":24},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What criteria does the editor use when deciding publication?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The editor decides based on reviewers’ recommendations and considers contribution importance, originality, clarity, study validity, and relevance. The decision must not be influenced by authors’ personal characteristics or beliefs.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does double-blind peer review work in JIOS?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Papers are published after a double-blind peer-reviewed process where reviewers do not know the author’s identity. Reviewer comments to the editor remain confidential and are anonymized before being shared with the author.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What ethical obligations do authors have regarding originality and plagiarism?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Authors must submit entirely original work and properly cite or quote others’ contributions. Plagiarism includes repackaging prior work with cosmetic changes or copying/paraphrasing without attribution, which is unacceptable.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},140486,1787576248,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":24,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":52,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":143},1099514068035,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Publication Ethics; List of Reviewers; Instructions for Authors  \n1. Publication Ethics  \nThe Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences (JIOS) upholds the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices.  \n1.1. Duties of the Editor  \nThe editor is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the academic record, for having processes in place to assure the quality of the published material as well as for precluding business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards.  \nThe editor selects reviewers for papers, decides on the required revisions and the acceptance of the paper in accordance with the reviewers' recommendation.  \n1.1.1. Publication Decisions  \nThe editor is responsible for deciding which manuscripts submitted to JIOS will be accepted for publication. This decision is based on the reviewers’ recommendation. The main selection criteria are the contribution’s importance, originality and clarity, as well as the study’s validity and its relevance. The decision will not be influenced by the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy. The editor may confer with reviewers while making this decision.  \n1.1.2. Confidentiality  \nThe editor must not disclose any information about a manuscript submitted to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other advisory board members, and the publisher, as appropriate.  \n1.1.3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest  \nUnpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript will not be used in the editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author.  \nJIOS, VOL. 48. NO. 1 (2024), PP. 243-252  \n243  \n1.2. Duties of Reviewers  \n1.2.1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions  \nPapers will be published in JIOS after a double-blind peer-reviewed process. Reviewers advise the editor. Reviewers do not know the author's identity and their comments to the editor are confidential and will be made anonymous before they are passed on to the author. The names of the reviewers remain strictly confidential, with their identities known only to the editor.  \n1.2.2. Promptness  \nAny selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible, should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.  \n1.2.3. Confidentiality  \nAny manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be disclosed to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.  \n1.2.4. Standards of Objectivity  \nReviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments, if necessary with explanation.  \n1.2.5. Acknowledgement of Sources  \nReviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. They should point out whether observations or arguments derived from other publications are accompanied by the respective source. Reviewers will notify track directors or the editor of any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.  \n1.2.6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest  \nPrivileged information or ideas obtained through the review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the papers.  \nJIOS, VOL. 48. NO. 1 (2024), PP. 243-252  \n244  \n1.3. Duties of Authors  \n1.3.1. Reporting Standards  \nAuthors of manuscripts should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significanc","cbCaipLFKUsYnIjw","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaipLFKUsYnIjw","pdf",435745,"English","# Publication Ethics\n## Duties of the Editor\n### Publication Decisions\n### Confidentiality\n### Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest\n## Duties of Reviewers\n### Contribution to Editorial Decisions\n### Promptness\n### Confidentiality\n### Standards of Objectivity\n### Acknowledgement of Sources\n### Disclosure and Conflict of Interest\n## Duties of Authors\n### Reporting Standards\n### Data Access and Retention\n### Originality and Plagiarism\n### Acknowledgement of Sources\n### Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication\n### Authorship of the Paper","[{\"question\":\"What criteria does the editor use when deciding publication?\",\"answer\":\"The editor decides based on reviewers’ recommendations and considers contribution importance, originality, clarity, study validity, and relevance. The decision must not be influenced by authors’ personal characteristics or beliefs.\"},{\"question\":\"How does double-blind peer review work in JIOS?\",\"answer\":\"Papers are published after a double-blind peer-reviewed process where reviewers do not know the author’s identity. Reviewer comments to the editor remain confidential and are anonymized before being shared with the author.\"},{\"question\":\"What ethical obligations do authors have regarding originality and plagiarism?\",\"answer\":\"Authors must submit entirely original work and properly cite or quote others’ contributions. Plagiarism includes repackaging prior work with cosmetic changes or copying/paraphrasing without attribution, which is unacceptable.\"}]","Publication Ethics - Instructions for Authors | PDF",25]