[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-310254-105":59,"doc-detail-310254-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","public-charge-ground-of-inadmissibility-final-rule","Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility - Final Rule","","U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issue a final rule rescinding the 2022 public charge ground of inadmissibility regulations. The rule states the 2022 Final Rule was not the best implementation of the statute due to inconsistency with congressional intent and undue restrictiveness. Rescission restores broader DHS officer discretion to evaluate relevant facts and aligns with longstanding policy of self-reliance and non-incentivizing immigration through government benefits, and it revises public charge bond breach and cancellation rules.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/public-charge-ground-of-inadmissibility-final-rule/310254/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/public-charge-ground-of-inadmissibility-final-rule/310254.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Mia  ","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-12","2026-09-20",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",17,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What does the final rule do regarding the 2022 public charge regulations?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It rescinds the 2022 public charge ground of inadmissibility regulations and explains that the prior implementation was inconsistent with congressional intent and unduly restrictive.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Why does DHS describe rescission as restoring broader discretion?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"Rescission restores broader discretion for DHS officers to evaluate all pertinent facts and aligns with long-standing policy that individuals in the U.S. should be self-reliant and government benefits should not incentivize immigration.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What additional regulatory changes does the rule make beyond rescinding the 2022 ground?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The rule revises the breach and cancellation of public charge bonds regulations and removes related regulatory provisions and definitions referenced in the notice.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},310254,1789880280,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},687207024478,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","Code: 9111-97  \nThis document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 2026-07-20 and available online at [https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-14539](https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-14539), and on  \n[https://govinfo.gov](https://govinfo.gov)  \nDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY  \n8 CFR Parts 103 and 212  \n[CIS No. 2857-26; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2025-0304]  \nRIN 1615-AD06  \nPublic Charge Ground of Inadmissibility  \nAGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) .  \nACTION: Final rule.  \nSUMMARY: DHS is rescinding the 2022 public charge ground of inadmissibility regulations (“2022 Final Rule”) . The 2022 Final Rule was not the best implementation of the statute. It was inconsistent with congressional intent, unduly restrictive, and hampered DHS’s ability to make accurate, precise, and reliable determinations of whether certain aliens are likely at any time to become a public charge. Rescission restores broader discretion for DHS officers to evaluate all pertinent facts and aligns with long-standing policy that aliens in the United States should be self-reliant and government benefits should not incentivize immigration. This rule also revises the breach and cancellation of public charge bonds regulations.  \nDATES: The final rule is effective on [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] . This rule applies to applications for admission made on or after [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] or applications for adjustment of status postmarked or electronically submitted on or after [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] . Receipt of means-tested public benefits before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] will be considered consistently with  \nthe 2022 Final Rule.  \nFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration  \nServices (USCIS), DHS, 5900 Capital Gateway Drive, Camp Springs, MD 20746; telephone (240) 721-3000 (not a toll-free call) .  \nSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  \nTable of Contents  \nI. Executive Summary  \nA. Purpose of the Regulatory Action  \nB. Legal Authority  \nC. Summary of the Proposed Rule  \nD. Implementation  \nE. Costs and Benefits  \nII. Background  \nA. Legal Authority  \nB. Grounds of Inadmissibility Generally  \nC. Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility  \nIII. Response to Public Comments on the Proposed Rule  \nA. Summary of Public Comments  \nB. Comments Expressing General Support for the Proposed Rule  \nC. Comments Expressing General Opposition to the Proposed Rule  \nD. Comments Regarding Legal Authority and Statutory Provisions  \n1. Statutory Authority  \n2. Congressional Intent and Historical Application  \n3. Administrative Law Concerns  \n4. Constitutional Concerns  \n5. Prospective Application of the Final Rule and Retroactivity Concerns  \nE. Negative Impacts on DHS and Immigration Policy Objectives  \n1. Concerns about Immigration Officer Discretion  \n2. Lack of Replacement Language or Framework  \n3. Immigration System Impacts, Operational Burdens, and Processing Delays  \n4. Misalignment with Longstanding Immigration Policies or U.S. Values  \nF. Negative Impacts on Applicants, Petitioners, Beneficiaries, and Support Systems  \n1. Chilling Effects on Benefit Usage  \n2. Concerns About Clarity and Discrimination  \nG. Negative Impacts on U.S. Economy, Businesses, and Communities  \n1. Workforce Impacts  \n2. Impacts of Reduced Consumer Spending  \n3. Concerns about U.S. Demographics  \n4. Impacts on Housing  \n5. Impacts to Innovation  \n6. Other Economic Effects  \n7. Impacts on the Military and Veterans  \nH. DHS’s Rationale and Justification for the Rule  \n1. Insufficient Evidence or Reasoned Justification to Change Policy  \n2. Insufficient Connection Between Receipt and Dependency on the Government  \n3. Would Not Accomplish Stated Goal to Reduce Public Expenditures  \n4. Agreement with Stated Need for Proposed","cbCaieCHnoFRkggH","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaieCHnoFRkggH","pdf",1333730,475,"English","# Executive Summary\n## Purpose of the Regulatory Action\n## Legal Authority\n## Summary of the Proposed Rule\n## Implementation\n## Costs and Benefits\n# Background\n## Legal Authority\n## Grounds of Inadmissibility Generally\n## Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility\n# Response to Public Comments on the Proposed Rule\n## Summary of Public Comments\n## Comments Expressing General Support for the Proposed Rule\n## Comments Expressing General Opposition to the Proposed Rule\n## Comments Regarding Legal Authority and Statutory Provisions\n# Amendments to Cancellation and Breach of Public Charge Bond Provisions\n# Removal of 8 CFR 212.20 and Related Public Charge Regulatory Definitions\n# Statutory and Regulatory Requirements","[{\"question\":\"What does the final rule do regarding the 2022 public charge regulations?\",\"answer\":\"It rescinds the 2022 public charge ground of inadmissibility regulations and explains that the prior implementation was inconsistent with congressional intent and unduly restrictive.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does DHS describe rescission as restoring broader discretion?\",\"answer\":\"Rescission restores broader discretion for DHS officers to evaluate all pertinent facts and aligns with long-standing policy that individuals in the U.S. should be self-reliant and government benefits should not incentivize immigration.\"},{\"question\":\"What additional regulatory changes does the rule make beyond rescinding the 2022 ground?\",\"answer\":\"The rule revises the breach and cancellation of public charge bonds regulations and removes related regulatory provisions and definitions referenced in the notice.\"}]","Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility - Final Rule | PDF",1197]