[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-203055-105":59,"doc-detail-203055-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","program-sponsor-alert-may-10-2019-number-19-04-joint-accreditation-information","Program Sponsor Alert - May 10, 2019 Number 19-04 - Joint Accreditation Information","","Program Sponsor Alert dated May 10, 2019 (Number 19-04) provides information for California institutions seeking joint accreditation from the Commission and CAEP. It covers how to complete the CBEST study to identify group average performance requirements enabling CBEST scores to address CAEP Standard 3.2, and how to address CAEP Standard 4.1 in California using multiple measures beyond value-added approaches, supported by referenced guidance documents and partnership agreement context.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/program-sponsor-alert-may-10-2019-number-19-04-joint-accreditation-information/203055/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/program-sponsor-alert-may-10-2019-number-19-04-joint-accreditation-information/203055.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Evangeline","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-09-04",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What is the purpose of Program Sponsor Alert Number 19-04?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It informs California institutions seeking joint accreditation from the Commission and CAEP about requirements and evidence for CAEP Standards 3.2 and 4.1, including how to use CBEST score equivalency and what data to provide in California.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How can institutions address CAEP Standard 3.2 using CBEST scores?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The alert explains that CAEP allows petitions for substantially equivalent alternative assessments, supported by a study conducted to map CBEST scores to the top 50% of SAT equivalents. Institutions may use the average CBEST scores of enrolled candidates as evidence for Standard 3.2.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What does CAEP Standard 4.1 require in California beyond value-added measures?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Institutions must document, using multiple measures, that program completers contribute to expected student-learning growth. Even though value-added measures may be common elsewhere, the alert notes California institutions must provide data other than value-added measures to demonstrate the required learning growth.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},203055,1788555116,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":14,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":24,"preview_page_count":4},13056703019662,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/be000253a8e92610077?_k=1778726343310543188","PROGRAM SPONSOR ALERT  \nDate: May 10, 2019 Number: 19-04  \nSubject: Information for California Institutions seeking Joint Accreditation from the Commission and CAEP  \nSummary  \nThe alert addresses two topics related to Commission-approved institutions seeking joint accreditation from the Commission and the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) .  \n1. Completion of the CBEST Study identifying the group average performance requirements to use CBEST Scores to address CAEP Standard 3.2  \n2. Addressing CAEP Standard 4.1 in California  \nBackground  \nCAEP Standard 3.2-Candidates Demonstrate Academic Achievement  \nCAEP Standard 3.2 requires institutions seeking CAEP accreditation to show that the group average performance of their enrolled candidates is in the top 50% of those assessed on nationally normed assessments at either admission or at some other time prior to candidate completion. Many states use candidate SAT scores for this nationally normed assessment, but CAEP allows states to petition for the use of a valid and reliable substantially equivalent alternative assessment of academic achievement on a case by case basis. Such petition requires submission of an equivalency study. Given that the majority of California educator preparation  \nProfessional Services Division  \n1900 Capitol Ave, Sacramento, CA 95811  [PSDinfo@ctc.ca.gov](PSDinfo@ctc.ca.gov)  \nprogram candidates complete preparation programs subsequent to earning a bachelor’s degree, Commission staff, at the request of a number of Commission-approved institutions seeking CAEP Accreditation, contracted with Evaluation Systems group of Pearson to conduct an equivalency study of California Basic Educational Skills Test (CBEST) scores to be used in lieu of SAT scores. The study has been accepted by CAEP, and there are now published CBEST scores that identify the CBEST score that is equivalent to the top 50% of scores on the SAT. They areas follows:  \n􀁸 CBEST Reading 50.24 􀁸 CBEST Mathematics 52.22  \nInstitutions seeking CAEP accreditation may use the average CBEST scores of their candidates as evidence for CAEP Standard 3.2. Specific information on how this information should be included in the CAEP Submission and in what format the data should be provided must be directed to CAEP.  \nCAEP Standard 4.1-Impact on P-12 Student Learning and Development  \nCAEP Standard 4.1 requires institutions to document, using multiple measures, that “…program completers contribute to an expected level of student-learning growth.” While institutions outside of California often use value-added measures to demonstrate this student-learning growth, the State Partnership agreement between the Commission and CAEP specifies that a Commission approved institution may not be required to use value-added measures to address CAEP Standard 4.1. However, it essential to understand that California institutions seeking CAEP accreditation are still required to provide data other than value-added measures to demonstrate that “…program completers contribute to an expected level of student-learning growth.”  \nCAEP has developed resources for institutions seeking CAEP accreditation including documents that can be found on the Commission on Standards and Performance Reporting webpage (see References below) . A specific resource that should assist California institutions seeking CAEP accreditation to demonstrate student-learning growth is the When States Provide Limited Data:  \nGuidance on Using Standard 4 to Drive Program Improvement (see References below) .  \nReferences  \nCAEP Standards  \nCAEP Standard 3, Component 3.2 Measures of Academic Proficiency Commission on Standards and Performance Reporting  \nWhen States Provide Limited Data: Guidance on Using Standard 4 to Drive Program Improvement  \nCommission and CAEP State Partnership Agreement  \nContact Information  \nThe Professional Services Division provides a full list of topic-and program-specific dedicated email addresses at: [http://","cbCaihf0miXhQeMQ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihf0miXhQeMQ","pdf",783373,"English","# Summary\n## Completion of CBEST Study for CAEP Standard 3.2\n## Addressing CAEP Standard 4.1 in California\n# Background\n## CAEP Standard 3.2 - Candidates Demonstrate Academic Achievement\n## CAEP Standard 4.1 - Impact on P-12 Student Learning and Development\n# References\n# Contact Information","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of Program Sponsor Alert Number 19-04?\",\"answer\":\"It informs California institutions seeking joint accreditation from the Commission and CAEP about requirements and evidence for CAEP Standards 3.2 and 4.1, including how to use CBEST score equivalency and what data to provide in California.\"},{\"question\":\"How can institutions address CAEP Standard 3.2 using CBEST scores?\",\"answer\":\"The alert explains that CAEP allows petitions for substantially equivalent alternative assessments, supported by a study conducted to map CBEST scores to the top 50% of SAT equivalents. Institutions may use the average CBEST scores of enrolled candidates as evidence for Standard 3.2.\"},{\"question\":\"What does CAEP Standard 4.1 require in California beyond value-added measures?\",\"answer\":\"Institutions must document, using multiple measures, that program completers contribute to expected student-learning growth. Even though value-added measures may be common elsewhere, the alert notes California institutions must provide data other than value-added measures to demonstrate the required learning growth.\"}]","Program Sponsor Alert - May 10, 2019 Number 19-04 - Joint Accreditation Information | PDF"]