[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-602654-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-602654-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","program-logic-for-a-teacher-education-accreditation-council-accredited-program-in-educational-leadership","Program Logic for a Teacher Education Accreditation Council Accredited Program in Educational Leadership","","Utilizing a program logic model supported planning and guidance for a successful Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) national accreditation of an educational leadership program. The model aligns six ISLLC standards with TEAC quality and processing principles and with TEAC inquiry brief elements emphasizing evidence. Faculty contributions strengthened model structure and operation. The article also explains the shift toward CAEP consolidation and how TEAC evidence requirements shaped accreditation preparation.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/program-logic-for-a-teacher-education-accreditation-council-accredited-program-in-educational-leadership/602654/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/program-logic-for-a-teacher-education-accreditation-council-accredited-program-in-educational-leadership/602654.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"pixelkiddo","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",5,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"How does the program logic model support TEAC national accreditation?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The model provides a planning and guidance structure by integrating six ISLLC standards with TEAC quality and processing principles and by mapping elements to the TEAC Inquiry Brief’s evidence-focused approach.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Why was Regent University required to develop a separate TEAC Inquiry Brief for educational leadership?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The program housed an Administration and Supervision PreK-12 endorsement and needed to complete a separate TEAC Inquiry Brief beyond the one required for combined teacher licensure programs.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What evidence does TEAC require during accreditation?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"TEAC requires evidence supporting the program’s case that graduates are competent, caring, and qualified, and its accreditation process examines and verifies that evidence.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},602654,1792885071,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962090883892,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/e00115db34f3e0f11b?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1790152879550218658","Program Logic for a Teacher Education Accreditation Council Accredited Program in Educational Leadership  \nGlenn L. Koonce and John C. Hanes  \nABSTRACT  \nUtilizing a program logic model allowed us to plan and guide our successful Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) national accreditation for our educational leadership program. The model integrates the six principal Interstate School Leaders Licensing Consortium (ISLLC) standards with TEAC’s Quality and Processing Principles and with the specific elements of the TEAC Inquiry Brief where evidence is emphasized and the accreditation process is focused. Faculty members’contributions enhanced the structure and operation of the model.  \nPROGRAm LOGIC fOR A TEACHER EDUCATIOn ACCREDITATIOn COUnCIL ACCREDITED PROGRAm In EDUCATIOnAL LEADERSHIP  \nThe boards of the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) and the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) votedon October 22, 2010 to consolidate teacher education accreditation under anew organization, the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) . Under CAEP, universities will have four options for educational leadership program accreditation. Programs currently in their national accreditation process are grandfathered into that process. National accreditation involves a great deal of planning to assure that high quality standards and principles are met and maintained. This article addresses one of the four CAEP options, the TEAC Inquiry Brief.  \nRegent University in Virginia Beach, VA made the decision for national accreditation after initial inquiries and attendance at the January 2005 American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) meeting, a follow-up meeting with the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) in July, 2005, and additional comprehensive TEAC training in March 2006. During this time period, the faculty adopted the TEAC process for national accreditation of all School of Education state licensure programs including endorsement in Administration and Supervision PreK-12 (Virginia Department of Education, 2007). The educational leadership program, that housed Administration and Supervision PreK-12 endorsement, was required to complete a separate TEAC Inquiry Brief apart from the TEAC Inquiry Brief required for the combined teacher licensure programs. Prior to thattime no separate educational leadership TEAC Inquiry Brief existed from any university. Regent University was one of the early programs in the nation pursuing TEAC accreditation. The faculty embarked on a new journey in planning for its educational leadership Inquiry Brief. Asthe program logic was being discussed and written, there was a need for a model within a single diagram that would provide direction for the faculty’s planning and actions. The program logic model evolved and was developed as the faculty engaged in the TEAC Inquiry Brief process. To be successful, the faculty had to learn the TEAC process and plan accordingly while being engaged atthe same time in that process.  \nFounded in 1997, the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC), has 200 members, including 185 institutions of higher education,“88 are already accredited and 83 are candidates for accreditation”(Teacher Education Accreditation Council, 2010, p. 1). TEAC membership also includes 13 affiliate institutions and 16 professional associations who support the TEAC process of accreditation. Recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) and by the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE), TEAC’s entire accreditation process is built around the program’s case that it prepares competent, caring, and qualified professional educators. TEAC requires the program to have evidence to support its case, and the accreditation process examines and verifies the evidence. TEAC’s membership represents education programs within a broad range of higher education institutions, from small liberal arts colleges to ","cbCaioQnD9JemPPa","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaioQnD9JemPPa","pdf",684614,18,"English","# Abstract\n# Background: NCATE/TEAC to CAEP\n# Accreditation Options and the TEAC Inquiry Brief\n# Regent University’s Preparation Timeline\n## TEAC training and state approval requirements\n## Educational leadership inquiry brief development\n# TEAC Organization and Membership\n## Evidence requirements and case-based accreditation\n# Selecting TEAC: Influence from California State University Monterey Bay\n## Design research and evidence/artefacts\n# Developing the Program Logic Model\n# Managing Change Through Accreditation Processes","[{\"question\":\"How does the program logic model support TEAC national accreditation?\",\"answer\":\"The model provides a planning and guidance structure by integrating six ISLLC standards with TEAC quality and processing principles and by mapping elements to the TEAC Inquiry Brief’s evidence-focused approach.\"},{\"question\":\"Why was Regent University required to develop a separate TEAC Inquiry Brief for educational leadership?\",\"answer\":\"The program housed an Administration and Supervision PreK-12 endorsement and needed to complete a separate TEAC Inquiry Brief beyond the one required for combined teacher licensure programs.\"},{\"question\":\"What evidence does TEAC require during accreditation?\",\"answer\":\"TEAC requires evidence supporting the program’s case that graduates are competent, caring, and qualified, and its accreditation process examines and verifies that evidence.\"}]","Program Logic for a Teacher Education Accreditation Council Accredited Program in Educational Leadership | PDF",1792095037,45]