[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-583428-105":59,"doc-detail-583428-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","profiles-of-for-profit-and-nonprofit-education-management-organizations-and-private-charter-holders-fourteenth-edition2011-2012","PROFILES OF FOR-PROFIT AND NONPROFIT EDUCATION MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND PRIVATE CHARTER HOLDERS - FOURTEENTH EDITION—2011-2012","","The report profiles for-profit and nonprofit education management organizations and private charter holders across the 2011-2012 school year, documenting continued growth in both sectors. It analyzes national trends, including the number of states where each type of organization operated, charter schools as a catalyst for new EMOs, and enrollment expansion in managed schools. It also summarizes company counts and scale, highlighting major operators and differences by state, while presenting organization profiles and appendices with methods and response tables.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/profiles-of-for-profit-and-nonprofit-education-management-organizations-and-private-charter-holders-fourteenth-edition2011-2012/583428/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/profiles-of-for-profit-and-nonprofit-education-management-organizations-and-private-charter-holders-fourteenth-edition2011-2012/583428.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jake","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-20","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What overall trend does the report describe for 2011-2012 across for-profit and nonprofit EMO sectors?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It describes continued growth in both sectors. It notes nonprofit growth is steadily faster than for-profit growth in terms of new nonprofit EMOs and new managed schools, alongside rapid student enrollment increases.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How did the geographic footprint of for-profit EMOs change in 2011-2012?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"For-profit EMOs operated in 35 states in 2011-2012, expanding into Oklahoma and Tennessee for the first time. Only a small number of schools in those states were fully managed by for-profit EMOs during the period.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How does the report break down company scale and profiling counts for for-profit EMOs?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It profiles 97 for-profit EMOs, including 17 large, 21 medium, and 59 small companies. It also provides historical growth estimates from the 1995-1996 school year through 2011-2012.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},583428,1792189148,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","PROFILES OF FOR-PROFIT AND NONPROFIT  \nEDUCATION MANAGEMENT  \nORGANIZATIONS  \nFOURTEENTH EDITION—2011-2012  \nGary Miron  \nWestern Michigan University  \nCharisse Gulosino  \nUniversity of Memphis November 2013  \nNational Education Policy Center  \nSchool of Education, University of Colorado Boulder Boulder, CO 80309-0249 Telephone: (802) 383-0058  \nEmail: [NEPC@colorado.edu](NEPC@colorado.edu)  \n[http://nepc.colorado.edu](http://nepc.colorado.edu)  \nThe annual report on Schoolhouse Commercialism trends is made possible in part by funding from Consumers Union and is produced by the Commercialism in Education Research Unit.  \nKevin Welner  \nEditor  \nJennifer Berkshire  \nAcademic Editor  \nWilliam Mathis  \nManaging Director  \nErik Gunn  \nManaging Editor  \nBriefs published by the National Education Policy Center (NEPC) are blind peer-reviewed by members of the Editorial Review Board. Visit [http://nepc.colorado.edu to](http://nepc.colorado.edu to) find all of these briefs. For information on the editorial board and its members, visit: [http://nepc.colorado.edu/editorial](http://nepc.colorado.edu/editorial)board.  \nPublishing Director: Alex Molnar  \nSuggested Citation:  \nMiron, G., & Gulosino, C. (2013). Profiles of for-profit and nonprofit education management organizations: Fourteenth Edition—2011-2012 . Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved [date] from [http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/EMO-profiles-11-12](http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/EMO-profiles-11-12)  \nThis material is provided free of cost to NEPC's readers, who may make non-commercial use of the material as long as NEPC and its author(s) are credited as the source. For inquiries about commercial use, please [contact NEPC at nepc@colorado.edu](contact NEPC at nepc@colorado.edu).  \nContents  \nExecutive Summary i  \nIntroduction and Background 1  \nThe EMO Industry: Background and Rationale 1  \nDefining Education Management Organizations 2  \nDescription of Data Collection and Sources of Information 3  \nPurpose of this Report 4  \nFindings for 2011-2012 5  \nNumber of Education Management Organizations Profiled 5  \nNumber of Schools Managed by Education Management Organizations 8  \nNumber of Students in Schools Managed by EMOs 12  \nNumber and Percent of EMOs by State 18  \nEducation Management Organization Summaries 23  \nEducation Management Organizations Profiles: 2011-2012 3o  \nSorted in Alphabetical Order and Grouped by Company Size  \nAppendices  \nAppendix A: Reader’s Guide 238  \nAppendix B: For Profit EMO Response Table 239  \nAppendix C: Nonprofit EMO Response Table 240  \nAppendix D: No Longer Profiled Companies 242  \nAppendix E: Methods 243  \nPROFILES OF FOR-PROFIT AND NONPROFIT EDUCATION MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND PRIVATE CHARTER HOLDERS :  \nFOURTEENTH EDITION—2011-2012  \nGary Miron, Western Michigan University Charisse Gulosino, University of Memphis  \nExecutive Summary  \nThe 2011-2012 school year marked another year of growth in both the for-profit and nonprofit education management sectors. In the previous three years we saw some signs of slowing growth in the for-profit sector, but the changes between 2010-2011 and 2011-12, demonstrate that there is still room for growth. The nonprofit management sector’s growth has been steadily growing faster than their for-profit counterparts, both in terms of new nonprofit EMOs and new managed schools. Student enrollments in all managed schools continue to grow at a rapid pace.  \nThe National Landscape  \nx The number of states in which for-profit EMOs operated was 35 in 2011-2012. The for-profit education management industry expanded into Oklahoma and Tennessee in 2011-2012 for the first time. Only two Oklahoma schools and one Tennessee school were fully managed by a for-profit EMO during this period.  \nx The number of states in which nonprofit EMOs operated was 29 in 2011-2012, up from26 states in 2009-2010. No new state was added to this sector in 2011-2012.  \nx Charter schools have been a catalyst for th","cbCaijaJD4ByeV6p","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijaJD4ByeV6p","pdf",4155549,250,"English","# Executive Summary\n## Introduction and Background\n## The EMO Industry: Background and Rationale\n## Defining Education Management Organizations\n## Description of Data Collection and Sources of Information\n## Purpose of this Report\n## Findings for 2011-2012\n## Education Management Organization Summaries\n## Education Management Organizations Profiles: 2011-2012","[{\"question\":\"What overall trend does the report describe for 2011-2012 across for-profit and nonprofit EMO sectors?\",\"answer\":\"It describes continued growth in both sectors. It notes nonprofit growth is steadily faster than for-profit growth in terms of new nonprofit EMOs and new managed schools, alongside rapid student enrollment increases.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the geographic footprint of for-profit EMOs change in 2011-2012?\",\"answer\":\"For-profit EMOs operated in 35 states in 2011-2012, expanding into Oklahoma and Tennessee for the first time. Only a small number of schools in those states were fully managed by for-profit EMOs during the period.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the report break down company scale and profiling counts for for-profit EMOs?\",\"answer\":\"It profiles 97 for-profit EMOs, including 17 large, 21 medium, and 59 small companies. It also provides historical growth estimates from the 1995-1996 school year through 2011-2012.\"}]","PROFILES OF FOR-PROFIT AND NONPROFIT EDUCATION MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND PRIVATE CHARTER HOLDERS - FOURTEENTH EDITION—2011-2012 | PDF",1792047185,630]