[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33597-en":3,"doc-seo-33597-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33597,687197207639,"Asher","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd",2,"Literature","Princeton Classics Susan Neiman Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative","Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative by Susan Neiman examines how modern philosophy has framed the problem of evil and challenges inherited ways of thinking. The book develops an alternative approach to understanding responsibility, moral judgment, and historical suffering in modernity. It situates the discussion within major intellectual traditions, clarifying the conceptual tensions that shape ethical and political interpretations of wrongdoing and injustice.","","cbCair4LdVtP3FI1","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCair4LdVtP3FI1","pdf",1611374,1,405,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n## The problem of evil in modernity\n## Moral responsibility and judgment\n## Historical suffering and injustice","[{\"question\":\"What central topic does Susan Neiman address in Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative?\",\"answer\":\"The book focuses on how modern philosophy interprets the problem of evil and how that interpretation shapes moral and ethical reasoning.\"},{\"question\":\"What does “alternative” refer to in the book’s approach?\",\"answer\":\"“Alternative” signals a different way of conceptualizing evil and its moral implications, departing from inherited modern framings.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the discussion connected to responsibility and historical suffering?\",\"answer\":\"The treatment links evil to questions of moral responsibility and connects ethical analysis to experiences of suffering and injustice in modern history.\"}]",1782213127,624,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":27},"princeton-classics-susan-neiman-evil-in-modern-thought-an-alternative",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,51,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/princeton-classics-susan-neiman-evil-in-modern-thought-an-alternative/33597/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-02","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What central topic does Susan Neiman address in Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"The book focuses on how modern philosophy interprets the problem of evil and how that interpretation shapes moral and ethical reasoning.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"What does “alternative” refer to in the book’s approach?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"“Alternative” signals a different way of conceptualizing evil and its moral implications, departing from inherited modern framings.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"How is the discussion connected to responsibility and historical suffering?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"The treatment links evil to questions of moral responsibility and connects ethical analysis to experiences of suffering and injustice in modern history.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]