[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33596-en":3,"doc-seo-33596-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33596,687197207639,"Asher","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd",2,"Literature","Power without Knowledge A Critique of Technocracy Friedman Jeffrey","A critique of technocracy that examines how power is exercised without genuine knowledge or democratic accountability. The work argues that expertise-centered governance can distort priorities, concentrate authority, and weaken critical public oversight. It focuses on the disconnect between technical decision-making and the broader social, ethical, and political knowledge required for legitimacy. The analysis highlights the consequences of treating technical systems as self-justifying sources of authority.","","cbCaigQX4sRG752O","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigQX4sRG752O","pdf",5429491,1,544,"English","en",105,"# Core Argument\n## Disconnect Between Expertise and Knowledge\n# Consequences of Technocratic Power\n## Accountability and Legitimacy\n# Implications for Governance","[{\"question\":\"What does the title suggest about technocracy?\",\"answer\":\"It indicates that power can be exercised without real knowledge, implying a harmful gap between authority and understanding.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the document critique expertise-centered governance?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that concentrating decision-making in technical elites can distort priorities and reduce meaningful public accountability.\"},{\"question\":\"What are the main consequences discussed?\",\"answer\":\"The document emphasizes legitimacy problems and the social/ethical risks that arise when technical reasoning is treated as sufficient on its own.\"}]",1782213120,838,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":27},"power-without-knowledge-a-critique-of-technocracy-friedman-jeffrey",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,51,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/power-without-knowledge-a-critique-of-technocracy-friedman-jeffrey/33596/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-03","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What does the title suggest about technocracy?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"It indicates that power can be exercised without real knowledge, implying a harmful gap between authority and understanding.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"Why does the document critique expertise-centered governance?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"It argues that concentrating decision-making in technical elites can distort priorities and reduce meaningful public accountability.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What are the main consequences discussed?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"The document emphasizes legitimacy problems and the social/ethical risks that arise when technical reasoning is treated as sufficient on its own.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]