[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-434643-105":59,"doc-detail-434643-en":129},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":122,"head_meta":124,"extra_data":126,"updated_unix":128},105,"en","positioning-and-validating-the-supervision-framework","Positioning and Validating the Supervision Framework","","Positioning and validating the supervision framework for Dutch primary and secondary education focuses on how current educational supervision is shaped within public discourse and policy processes. The work examines how core supervision indicators can be validated by drawing on a knowledge base from educational effectiveness research. It explains how legal expectations, stakeholder consensus, scientific knowledge, and societal views jointly underpin quality requirements and guide oversight operations, including updates to supervision frameworks.",{"@graph":69,"@context":121},[70,84,104],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/positioning-and-validating-the-supervision-framework/434643/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":98,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":99,"interactionStatistic":100},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/positioning-and-validating-the-supervision-framework/434643.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"นรินทร์","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":101,"interactionType":102,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":103},"ViewAction",{"@type":105,"mainEntity":106},"FAQPage",[107,113,117],{"name":108,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":110},"What is the main purpose of the supervision framework discussed in the document?","Question",{"text":111,"@type":112},"To position and validate supervision frameworks for primary and secondary education by aligning core indicators with the knowledge base of educational effectiveness research.","Answer",{"name":114,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":115},"How are quality requirements for supervision developed?",{"text":116,"@type":112},"They are grounded in a consensus-based process involving multiple parties, and formally legitimized through ministerial approval of supervision frameworks.",{"name":118,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":119},"Why were supervision frameworks revised in 2003?",{"text":120,"@type":112},"To improve practical usability and address imbalances in how observations and judgments connected within the layered structure of the initial design for JO and PKO.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":123,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":125,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":127,"site_id":62},434643,1790670113,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":130},{"doc_id":127,"user_id":131,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":132,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":133,"file_id":134,"file_url":135,"file_type":136,"file_size":137,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":138,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":128,"read_time":143},2336475104957,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000c4c6bd8a5076e1?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1787554080175789136","Positioning and Validating the Supervision Framework  \nJaap Scheerens, Tina Seidel, Bob Witziers, Maria Hendriks & Gerard Doornekamp  \nfaculty of  \nBEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES  \nUniversity of Twente  \nDepartment of  \nEducational Organisation and Management  \nPositioning and Validating the Supervision Framework  \nPositioning the supervision frameworks for primary and secondary education of the Dutch Educational Inspectorate in current educational discourse and validating core indicators against the knowledge base of educational effectiveness research  \nJaap Scheerens, Tina Seidel, Bob Witziers, Maria Hendriks & Gerard Doornekamp  \nPositioning and Validating the Supervision Framework/ J. Scheerens, T. Seidel, B. Witziers, M. Hendriks & G. Doornekamp. Enschede/Kiel: University of Twente, Department of Educational Organisation and Management / IPN: 2005 – 430 p.  \nISBN: 90-365-2343-5  \nThis project was financially supported by a grant from the Dutch Educational Inspectorate.  \nColofon  \nReproduction: Grafisch Centrum Twente  \nNo. of prints: 250  \nOrdering address: University of Twente  \nFaculty of Behavioural Sciences  \nDepartment of Educational Organisation and Management  \nP.O. Box 217  \n7500 AE Enschede  \nthe Netherlands  \ntel. 053 489 4579  \n© 2005 Alle rechten voorbehouden  \nNo part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, photocopying or otherwise, without permission in writing from the publishers.  \nTen geleide  \nDe Wet op het Onderwijstoezicht (WOT) draagt de Inspectie van het Onderwijs opscholen te beoordelen op de mate waarin deze de verwachtingen van de Nederlandsesamenleving waarmaken. Wat die verwachtingen precies zijn en de vraag wanneer deze‘voldoende’ worden waargemaakt wordt bepaald in een proces waarbij meerdere partijen betrokken zijn. In de eerste plaats de onderwijsinstellingen, omdat zij de grootsteverantwoordelijkheid dragen voor de invulling en realisering van kwaliteit. Daarnaastheeft de samenleving een groot belang bij een goed functionerend onderwijssysteem en bij opbrengsten die recht doen aan uiteenlopende belangen op het economische, maatschappelijke en individuele vlak. In de Memorie van Toelichting bij de WOT wordtin dat verband verwezen naar de direct betrokkenen (zoals leerlingen/deelnemers), afnemers (zoals vervolgonderwijs en werkgevers) en naar de maatschappij in bredere zin. Tenslotte heeft ook de overheid een belangrijke rol waar het gaat om het waarborgen van voldoende gemeenschappelijkheid, het garanderen van voldoende kwaliteit en het bevorderen van optimale kwaliteit. De zorg voor onderwijs is dus een gezamenlijkeverantwoordelijkheid; de Memorie van Toelichting spreekt in dat verband van “een meer open systeem […] waarbinnen de opvattingen over kwalitatief goed onderwijs – in debat met veld en samenleving – […] worden uitgewerkt”.  \nDeze gemeenschappelijke verantwoordelijkheid voor het onderwijs en de ruimte die dit biedt voor variëteit alsmede het primaat van de instellingen die het onderwijs verzorgen, waren belangrijke overwegingen achter de herziening van de wettelijke regeling voor hetonderwijstoezicht in de WOT en de invoering in 2003 van nieuwe vormen voor het toezicht.  \nDe hoofdlijnen van het toezicht zoals die in de WOT zijn vastgelegd worden uitgewerktin toezichtkaders. Deze komen volgens de bepalingen van de WOT tot stand in op consensus gericht overleg met diverse partijen. Een dergelijk op consensus gebaseerd kader draagt er volgens de MvT aan bij dat de uitoefening van het toezicht “consistent, transparant, controleerbaar en bediscussieerbaar” is; bovendien vormt een dergelijk kader“in feite een codificatie van overeenstemming”, waar in het overleg met de betrokken partijen naar is gestreefd.  \nDe ruimte voor variëteit en de ruimte voor uiteenlopende partijen om elk hun rol tespelen maakt een heldere bepaling van de algemeen geldende kwaliteitseisen en een stevige fundering daarvan van belang. Daarm","cbCaigYrTKDPIJBk","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigYrTKDPIJBk","pdf",1985610,428,"English","# Ten geleide\n## Legal basis and stakeholder expectations\n## Supervision frameworks and consensus processes\n## Role of scientific knowledge and societal views\n## Historical supervision approaches and revisions","[{\"question\":\"What is the main purpose of the supervision framework discussed in the document?\",\"answer\":\"To position and validate supervision frameworks for primary and secondary education by aligning core indicators with the knowledge base of educational effectiveness research.\"},{\"question\":\"How are quality requirements for supervision developed?\",\"answer\":\"They are grounded in a consensus-based process involving multiple parties, and formally legitimized through ministerial approval of supervision frameworks.\"},{\"question\":\"Why were supervision frameworks revised in 2003?\",\"answer\":\"To improve practical usability and address imbalances in how observations and judgments connected within the layered structure of the initial design for JO and PKO.\"}]","Positioning and Validating the Supervision Framework | PDF",1079]