[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-202015-105":59,"doc-detail-202015-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","planning-commission-minutes-november-5-1992","Planning Commission Minutes - November 5, 1992","","Minutes from a Planning Commission meeting held on November 5, 1992, documenting attendance of commissioners, officials, and guests. The record covers approval of prior minutes after spelling and wording corrections, review of preliminary plans for the Fox Run Subdivision, and discussion of requirements and constraints affecting road distance, stormwater facilities, and sewer tie-ins. The commission addresses water availability testing, sanitary sewer approvals, homeowners association setup, and plans for a public hearing regarding a variance.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/planning-commission-minutes-november-5-1992/202015/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/planning-commission-minutes-november-5-1992/202015.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Oliver Hayes","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-04",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What corrections were made to the October minutes before approval?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The commission reviewed spelling and wording errors, including specific changes to quoted terms and referenced lines, then approved the amended minutes.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What preliminary plan was reviewed for Fox Run Subdivision?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"A revised preliminary plan was presented showing 23 lots, three deeds, and a stormwater detention pond, along with statements that property pins and surrounding matches were verified.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"Why was a variance required for the proposed development?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Discussion focused on the road entrance distance from Maple Springs not meeting the stated 400-foot regulation, leading to the need for a variance review before action.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},202015,1788541072,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},687207020761,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","# RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS\n\nMinutes of PLANNING COMMISSION  \nMeeting  \n\n| DAYTON LEGAL BLKSK co.FOHM NO 1648   |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n|  | NOVEMBER 5,1992  \u003Cbr>HeldI  \u003Cbr>19---_   |  |\n|  | ENEERS PFESENT:BUTZ-V0ss,DANIELS,SUTLIFF,YOLNG,  \u003Cbr>COTESWORTH  \u003Cbr>DTHEE DFFICIAL5D,MARKDWITZ,D.HOCEVAR  \u003Cbr>GUESTS   .SIMON,J.BISHOP,S.MILLER,M.FISHER,  \u003Cbr>Mecting W&三Ca¹1ed tc order at 7:30 P.M。by Chairmn  \u003Cbr>Danie1s。  Rol1 cal1,ai1 membe二Were preent。  \u003Cbr>Chairman Lanie1 sked for corrections to the ūctober  \u003Cbr>minute:  Danie1s些tated the fo11owing spelling eror  \u003Cbr>shou1d be corrected,in the 4th line,“orrection=”  \u003Cbr>shouid be  correction\",on second pa9,second pargraph,  \u003Cbr>\"曲tate“shouid be“stated\",on the 1ast pa  ,eioht 1ine  \u003Cbr>from the bottom,the word sighted\"shouid read\"cited。  \u003Cbr>Markowitz statec some anguage was 1eft out of the mot ion  \u003Cbr>regarding Emeraid Lake II,on page 57.  In the seventh  \u003Cbr>I ine of the last paragraph。fo¹1owing \"402,000\",主t  \u003Cbr>shou1d read \"and the Vil1ae metain the un of年37,500\\#。  \u003Cbr>Eight Tines down from this,fol1owing the\"and before  \u003Cbr>\"Bell+1cwer\"acd \"Escrow Agreement of B1ock B,Enveiope  \u003Cbr>\\#25,\\#26,\\#27 and \\#28 and\"。  There being no further  \u003Cbr>Corrections,Cotesworth moved to approve minute a  \u003Cbr>mended,Butz-Voss Znd.  Fo11 cal¹,a¹1 ayes。  \u003Cbr>Jerry Bishop,Fox Run Subdivision,presented a revisec  \u003Cbr>preiiminary plan for the Commission review。Pian shows 23  \u003Cbr>iots W1th three cL1 deaCs and a pond for storm water  \u003Cbr>detention.  ir.Bishop stated they have surveyed their  \u003Cbr>property and it matches ith a11 the pins □f the  \u003Cbr>Surrounding property and everything c¹ose。  r,Bishop  \u003Cbr>Stateci he has made the corrections requested at the 1ast  \u003Cbr>meeting Comnis5ion reviewed the pians:  \u003Cbr>Mr。Miarkowitz出tated the尝appears to be a orob¹em With  \u003Cbr>the iocation of the entrance roa口，it does not appear to  \u003Cbr>be far enough away from Maple Spring。  The reguiation  \u003Cbr>require二400 feet between any otner 1ocal street  \u003Cbr>intersection and it appears there is only about 300 eet  \u003Cbr>from Maple Springs and the entrance o the proposed  \u003Cbr>devel opment。     。Markowitz advised Mr.Bishop that if  \u003Cbr>this is the Case,he wouid have to apply for a Variance  \u003Cbr>which wouic be heard befor the P¹anning Commission。  M。  \u003Cbr>Bishop asked the三ecretarv to senc him the ne仁 当Sary  \u003Cbr>applicaticn and information to apply for a Variance。  \u003Cbr>Commission ciscLBed the storm当ewer e&ement that goe血  \u003Cbr>th产ough the middle of this property。  Commission stateci  \u003Cbr>their concern regarding this Sewer being sufficient to  \u003Cbr>hand1e the run-□ff。   r。Bishop曲tated their plan wi!1  \u003Cbr>accommodate whatever is necessary.  Commission stated the  \u003Cbr>Vil1age Engineer wil1 have to make sure whatever is  \u003Cbr>□roDosed,wil1 be sufficient。  \u003Cbr>Nr.Bishop stated a当far as water,once he can get  \u003Cbr>approval on his preliminary piaty the very next tep i  \u003Cbr>to have the existing we11 plugged,as per Dr.Eckstein当  \u003Cbr>request and then two new test we¹1s wil1 be dmilled to  \u003Cbr>determine whether there is sLfficient water to当Lpport  \u003Cbr>this devei opment。  \u003Cbr>Mr.Bishop二tated he aiready na approval for the  \u003Cbr>sanitary sewer tap-ins from the Geauga County Sanitarv  \u003Cbr>Engineer。  Markowit2 stated Mie。Bishop曲approval from   |  |\n\nDAYTON LEGAL BLANK Co.FORM NO.10148  \n\n|  | Held  \u003Cbr>19_______   |  |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n|  | Zan Lee Wa datec August 18.1992。  Since that cate  \u003Cbr>ther has been a moratorium imposeci by the County  \u003Cbr>Commissioner on tie-ins to the ewer。  Narkowitz tateo  \u003Cbr>he ha a ieter stating such from the ounty and the 1ot  \u003Cbr>for Iir.Bishop¹s deve1opment are not inc1uded in those  \u003Cbr>which are Dart of the South Russel1 ai¹ocation sti11  \u003Cbr>广emaining:  iark owitz当tated what the Viilage neecs is  \u003Cbr>for Pi。Bishoo to 9o back to the County and get a neW  \u003Cbr>1etter verifying that these 1ots wili have当ewer  \u003Cbr>tie-ins。  Me.Bishop statec he wil1 do this and ubmit to  \u003Cbr>the Vil1age。  \u003Cbr>Mr。4arkowitz tateci","cbCaion3Xqrd7yor","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaion3Xqrd7yor","pdf",21969764,227,"English","# RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS\n## Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting","[{\"question\":\"What corrections were made to the October minutes before approval?\",\"answer\":\"The commission reviewed spelling and wording errors, including specific changes to quoted terms and referenced lines, then approved the amended minutes.\"},{\"question\":\"What preliminary plan was reviewed for Fox Run Subdivision?\",\"answer\":\"A revised preliminary plan was presented showing 23 lots, three deeds, and a stormwater detention pond, along with statements that property pins and surrounding matches were verified.\"},{\"question\":\"Why was a variance required for the proposed development?\",\"answer\":\"Discussion focused on the road entrance distance from Maple Springs not meeting the stated 400-foot regulation, leading to the need for a variance review before action.\"}]","Planning Commission Minutes - November 5, 1992 | PDF",572]