[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33580-en":3,"doc-seo-33580-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":11,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33580,1099514068035,"Ezra","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c",2,"Literature","Philosophy without Intuitions Oxford University Press 2012","Philosophy without Intuitions examines how philosophical reasoning can proceed without relying on the authority of intuitive judgments. The focus is on evaluating arguments, methods, and inferential strategies that do not assume shared “common sense” perceptions as starting points. Emphasis falls on clarifying what counts as justification, how disagreements can be handled, and how alternative sources of support can be used to assess philosophical claims with greater rigor and less dependence on intuition.","","cbCaicjtA9M2IA7A","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaicjtA9M2IA7A","pdf",1003747,1,255,"English","en",105,"# Core Approach\n## Replacing Intuition in Philosophical Reasoning\n## Justification and Method","[{\"question\":\"What is the central theme of Philosophy without Intuitions?\",\"answer\":\"It centers on conducting philosophical reasoning without depending on intuitive judgments as key evidence.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the book question the role of intuition in philosophy?\",\"answer\":\"It aims to reduce reliance on contested intuitive “starting points” and to examine stronger forms of justification and argument support.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the book suggest philosophers can justify claims without intuition?\",\"answer\":\"By emphasizing explicit reasoning, argument structure, and alternative standards of support rather than treating intuitions as authoritative.\"}]",1782212932,393,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":27},"philosophy-without-intuitions-oxford-university-press-2012",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,51,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/philosophy-without-intuitions-oxford-university-press-2012/33580/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-01","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":11},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What is the central theme of Philosophy without Intuitions?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"It centers on conducting philosophical reasoning without depending on intuitive judgments as key evidence.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"Why does the book question the role of intuition in philosophy?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"It aims to reduce reliance on contested intuitive “starting points” and to examine stronger forms of justification and argument support.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"How does the book suggest philosophers can justify claims without intuition?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"By emphasizing explicit reasoning, argument structure, and alternative standards of support rather than treating intuitions as authoritative.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]