[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-269292-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-269292-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","pge-final-safety-report-2017-safety-culture-assessment","PGE Final Safety Report - 2017 - Safety Culture Assessment","","Final report assessing Pacific Gas and Electric Corporation’s and Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s safety culture submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission for May 8, 2017. Developed by NorthStar Consulting Group, it evaluates safety and cultural governance across executive summary, background, strategy and governance, organization, field operations, budgeting and spending, compensation and performance management, recruiting and training, communications, safety reporting/corrective action, and contractor safety. Includes key conclusions and critical recommendations for PG&E and the Commission, supporting measurable improvements.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/pge-final-safety-report-2017-safety-culture-assessment/269292/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/pge-final-safety-report-2017-safety-culture-assessment/269292.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"McGucket","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-01","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of this final safety report?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It assesses the safety culture of PG&E and PG&E Company for review by the California Public Utilities Commission, presenting conclusions and critical recommendations.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Who prepared and who requested the report?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"NorthStar Consulting Group prepared the final report, which is prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"Which major areas does the report evaluate?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It evaluates strategy and governance, organization, field operations, budgeting and spending, compensation and performance management, recruiting and training, communications, safety reporting/corrective action, and contractor safety.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},269292,1789450025,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},1236954412713,"https://us-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","ASSESSMENT OF  \nPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION AND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY’S  \nSAFETY CULTURE  \nPREPARED FOR  \nCALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION  \nMAY 8, 2017  \nFINAL REPORT  \n NORTHSTAR CONSULTING GROUP  \nMANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS  \nSANTA MARIA, CA 􀂋LAS VEGAS, NV 􀂋SAN FRANCISCO, CA 􀂋SAN DIEGO, CA  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \nI. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  \nA. Summary ...................................................................................................... I-1  \nB. Background .................................................................................................. I-2  \nC. Safety and Culture........................................................................................ I-3  \nD. Scope and Objectives ................................................................................... I-4  \nE. Key Conclusions .......................................................................................... I-6  \nF. Critical Recommendations ........................................................................... I-10  \nG. Recommendations for PG&E ...................................................................... I-10  \nH. Recommendations for the Commission ....................................................... I-16  \nII. BACKGROUND  \nA. Pacific Gas and Electric Company .............................................................. II-1  \nB. Events Leading to the Investigation ............................................................. II-8  \nC. Safety and Culture........................................................................................ II-11  \nD. Scope and Objectives ................................................................................... II-12  \nE. Work Activities ............................................................................................ II-16  \nF. Organization of this Report.......................................................................... II-17  \nIII. STRATEGY AND GOVERNANCE  \nA. Background .................................................................................................. III-1  \nB. Evaluative Criteria ....................................................................................... III-5  \nC. Findings and Conclusions ............................................................................ III-5  \nD. Recommendations ........................................................................................ III-21  \nIV. ORGANIZATION  \nA. Background .................................................................................................. IV-1  \nB. Evaluative Criteria ....................................................................................... IV-12  \nC. Findings and Conclusions ............................................................................ IV-12  \nD. Recommendations ........................................................................................ IV-24  \nV. FIELD OPERATIONS  \nA. Background .................................................................................................. V-1  \nB. Evaluative Criteria ....................................................................................... V-4  \nC. Findings and Conclusions ............................................................................ V-5  \nD. Recommendations ........................................................................................ V-23  \nVI. BUDGETING AND SPENDING  \nA. Background .................................................................................................. VI-1  \nB. Evaluative Criteria ....................................................................................... VI-10  \nC. Findings and Conclusions ............................................................................ VI-10  \nD. Recommendations ........................................................................................ VI-31  \nVII. COMPENSATION AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT  \nA. Background ........","cbCaikapMAzB0lFx","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaikapMAzB0lFx","pdf",4289844,336,"English","# Executive Summary\n## Summary\n## Background\n## Safety and Culture\n## Scope and Objectives\n## Key Conclusions\n## Critical Recommendations\n## Recommendations for PG&E\n## Recommendations for the Commission\n# Background\n## Pacific Gas and Electric Company\n## Events Leading to the Investigation\n## Safety and Culture\n## Scope and Objectives\n## Work Activities\n## Organization of this Report\n# Strategy and Governance\n## Evaluative Criteria\n## Findings and Conclusions\n## Recommendations\n# Organization\n## Evaluative Criteria\n## Findings and Conclusions\n## Recommendations\n# Field Operations\n## Evaluative Criteria\n## Findings and Conclusions\n## Recommendations\n# Budgeting and Spending\n## Evaluative Criteria\n## Findings and Conclusions\n## Recommendations\n# Compensation and Performance Management\n## Evaluative Criteria\n## Findings and Conclusions\n## Recommendations\n# Recruiting and Training\n## Evaluative Criteria\n## Findings and Conclusions\n## Recommendations\n# Communications\n## Evaluative Criteria\n## Findings and Conclusions\n## Recommendations\n# Safety Reporting/Corrective Action\n## Evaluative Criteria\n## Findings and Conclusions\n## Recommendations\n# Contractor Safety","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of this final safety report?\",\"answer\":\"It assesses the safety culture of PG\\u0026E and PG\\u0026E Company for review by the California Public Utilities Commission, presenting conclusions and critical recommendations.\"},{\"question\":\"Who prepared and who requested the report?\",\"answer\":\"NorthStar Consulting Group prepared the final report, which is prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission.\"},{\"question\":\"Which major areas does the report evaluate?\",\"answer\":\"It evaluates strategy and governance, organization, field operations, budgeting and spending, compensation and performance management, recruiting and training, communications, safety reporting/corrective action, and contractor safety.\"}]","PGE Final Safety Report - 2017 - Safety Culture Assessment | PDF",847]