[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-514106-105":59,"doc-detail-514106-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","petition-for-review-petition-for-review-negative-option-rule-rin-3084-ab60","Petition for Review - Petition for Review - Negative Option Rule (RIN 3084-AB60)","","Petitioners Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau, and NCTA-The Internet & Television Association file a Petition for Review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit challenging the Federal Trade Commission’s Final Rule in the Negative Option Rule (RIN 3084-AB60), issued October 16, 2024. The petition argues the rule is arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence, and beyond the Commission’s statutory authority. Petitioners request the court to hold the Final Rule unlawful, vacate, enjoin, and set it aside, and seek further appropriate relief.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/petition-for-review-petition-for-review-negative-option-rule-rin-3084-ab60/514106/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/petition-for-review-petition-for-review-negative-option-rule-rin-3084-ab60/514106.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Fahsai","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-08","2026-10-06",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":29},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Who are the petitioners challenging the FTC Final Rule?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau, and NCTA-The Internet & Television Association.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What rule is being challenged in this petition?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The Federal Trade Commission’s Final Rule in the Negative Option Rule, RIN 3084-AB60, issued October 16, 2024.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What relief do petitioners request from the Fifth Circuit?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The court should hold the Final Rule unlawful, vacate it, enjoin it, set it aside, and grant any additional appropriate relief.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},514106,1791662773,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":29,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},549768702563,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/8000c4aa63b76e948b?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786536092046926083","Case: 24-60542 Document: 1-2 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2024  \nIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  \nELECTRONIC SECURITY ASSOCIATION, INTERACTIVE ADVERTISING BUREAU, and NCTA – THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION,  \nPetitioners,  \nv.  \nFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,  \nRespondent.  \nCase No. 24-   \nOct. 22, 2024  \nPETITION FOR REVIEW  \nAllyson N. Ho Brad G. Hubbard  \nBrian A. Richman  \nGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 2001 Ross Avenue  \nSuite 2100  \nDallas, TX 75201-2923  \nHelgi C. Walker Lucas C. Townsend Michael P. Corcoran Lael Weinberger Andrew Ebrahem  \nGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1700 M Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036  \n(202) 955-8500  \n[hwalker@gibsondunn.com](hwalker@gibsondunn.com)  \nCounsel for Petitioners  \nCase: 24-60542 Document: 1-2 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/23/2024  \nCERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS  \nThe undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons and entities as described in the fourth sentence of Fifth Circuit Rule 28.2.1 have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal.  \nFurther, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 . 1, the undersigned counsel of record certifies that there are no corporations that are either parents of any petitioner or that own stock in the petitioners.  \nA. Petitioners  \n1. Electronic Security Association  \n2. Interactive Advertising Bureau  \n3. NCTA – The Internet & Television Association  \nB. Attorneys for Petitioners  \nHelgi C. Walker  \nLucas C. Townsend  \nMichael P. Corcoran  \nLael Weinberger  \nAndrew Ebrahem  \nGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP  \n1700 M Street, N.W.  \nWashington, DC 20036  \nCase: 24-60542 Document: 1-2 Page: 3 Date Filed: 10/23/2024  \nAllyson N. Ho  \nBrad G. Hubbard  \nBrian A. Richman  \nGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP  \n2001 Ross Avenue  \nSuite 2100  \nDallas, TX 75201  \nC. Respondent  \nFederal Trade Commission  \nD. Attorneys for Respondent  \nAnisha Dasgupta  \nGeneral Counsel  \nFederal Trade Commission  \n600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.  \nWashington, D. C. 20580  \nDated: October 22 , 2024  \nAllyson N. Ho Brad G. Hubbard  \nBrian A. Richman  \nGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 2001 Ross Avenue  \nSuite 2100  \nDallas, TX 75201-2923  \nRespectfully submitted,  \n /s/ Helgi C. Walker   \nHelgi C. Walker Lucas C. Townsend Michael P. Corcoran Lael Weinberger Andrew Ebrahem  \nGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1700 M Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036  \n(202) 887-3599  \n[hwalker@gibsondunn.com](hwalker@gibsondunn.com)  \nCounsel for Petitioners  \nCase: 24-60542 Document: 1-2 Page: 4 Date Filed: 10/23/2024  \nPETITION FOR REVIEW  \nPursuant to 5 U. S. C. §§ 702–704, 706, 15 U. S.C. § 57a(e), and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15(a), the Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau, and NCTA – The Internet & Television Association petition this Court for review of the order issuing the Final Rule of the Federal Trade Commission in Negative Option Rule, RIN 3084-AB60 (“Final Rule”) , issued on October 16, 2024. A copy of the Final Rule is attached as Exhibit A.  \nVenue is proper in this Circuit under 15 U. S. C. § 57a(e)(1)(A)  \nbecause petitioner Electronic Security Association’s principal offices are located in Dallas, Texas.  \nThe Final Rule is an attempt to regulate consumer contracts for all companies in all industries and across all sectors ofthe economy in which the customer purchases a service or subscription that will continue unless the customer exercises the option to cancel. The Final Rule calls these “negative option” contracts—estimated as covering over a billion paid subscriptions in the United States, Final Rule at 175—and deems them all to be deceptive unless they comply with onerous new regulatory obligations regarding disclosures, how those disclosures are  \nCase: 24-60542 Document: 1-2 Page: 5 Date Filed: 10/23/2024  \ncommunicated, a “separate” consent requirement, regulations of truthful company ","cbCaiqR0nGYWO9Du","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqR0nGYWO9Du","pdf",2617222,240,"English","# Petition for Review\n## Parties and Case Information\n## Certificate of Interested Persons\n## Grounds for Review and Requested Relief\n## Certificate of Electronic Submission","[{\"question\":\"Who are the petitioners challenging the FTC Final Rule?\",\"answer\":\"Electronic Security Association, Interactive Advertising Bureau, and NCTA-The Internet \\u0026 Television Association.\"},{\"question\":\"What rule is being challenged in this petition?\",\"answer\":\"The Federal Trade Commission’s Final Rule in the Negative Option Rule, RIN 3084-AB60, issued October 16, 2024.\"},{\"question\":\"What relief do petitioners request from the Fifth Circuit?\",\"answer\":\"The court should hold the Final Rule unlawful, vacate it, enjoin it, set it aside, and grant any additional appropriate relief.\"}]","Petition for Review - Petition for Review - Negative Option Rule (RIN 3084-AB60) | PDF",1791296446,605]