[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-599671-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-599671-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","peer-debriefing-teachers-reflective-practices-for-professional-growth","Peer Debriefing: Teachers’ Reflective Practices for Professional Growth","","Peer debriefing is presented as a structured, reflective practice that allows teachers to expose their thinking to a knowledgeable but disinterested colleague. By sharing classroom data, interpretations, and instructional experiences, educators can clarify perceptions, confirm or challenge conclusions, and illuminate learning situations that may remain implicit. The article frames peer debriefing as valuable beyond qualitative research, including for teacher education and for supporting both preservice and inservice professional growth through systematic, meaningful discussion and evaluation.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/peer-debriefing-teachers-reflective-practices-for-professional-growth/599671/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/peer-debriefing-teachers-reflective-practices-for-professional-growth/599671.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"jayni","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-27","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",5,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is peer debriefing in the context of this article?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Peer debriefing is described as a process where teachers share their inquiry or classroom thinking with a trusted, knowledgeable but disinterested peer to explore aspects that might otherwise remain implicit.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Why can peer debriefing help teachers improve their instruction?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It supports educators by providing outside perspective, enabling them to recall additional facts, shift toward more objective critique, and refine or revise their evaluations of classroom events and outcomes.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How does the article suggest peer debriefing occurs in teacher practice?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Teachers may function as disinterested peers for one another by discussing instructional practices, solving problems, and exploring new theories, although isolation and time constraints can limit this support.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},599671,1792160961,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":123,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},3985747859343,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","| | Peer Debriefing: Teachers’ Reflective Practices for Professional Growth |\n| --- | --- |\n|  |  |\n\nCindy Hail, Beth Hurst, & Deanne Camp, Missouri State University  \n“I never cry at school, but this particular day I was sitting at my desk on the verge of tears. I was teaching a high school writing class and was feeling a great sense of failure. A colleague who rarely comes by my room suddenly showed up at my door. When Isaw her, the dam broke, and I burst into tears. When she asked what was wrong, I lamented about what a terrible job I felt I was doing teaching my students how to write and was counting my failures on both hands. She started asking me questions. I showed her pre and post writing scores and pre and post reading and writing interest inventories. She began to see some things I hadn’t noticed. She showed me where there was more improvement than I had perceived. Because of her outside perspective, I was able to see that my perceptions differed from the facts.”  \nIntroduction  \nThis story exemplifies the role of peer debriefing. Lincoln and Guba (1985) define peer debriefing as a \"process of exposing oneself to a disinterested peer in a manner paralleling an analytic session and for the purpose of exploring aspects of the inquiry that might otherwise remain only implicit within the inquirer's mind\" (p. 308) . A disinterested peer is someone who isnot an immediate stakeholder in the outcome of a project, but who is a knowledgeable source on the topic. For example, a ninth grade English teacher may not have a stake in the outcome of a class project by the science teacher across the hall, but since they both teach the same grade, the English teacher knows about the needs of ninth graders and can serve as a knowledgeable source for the science teacher. This fits Schwandt’s (2007) definition of peer debriefing where a teacher“confides in trusted and knowledgeable colleagues and uses them as a sounding board”(p. 222), or as Onwuegbuzie and Leech (2007) refer to as an outside or external evaluation or perspective. Researchers, especially qualitative researchers, have discussed the impact peer debriefing has on clarifying experiences, thoughts, and theories, and how it helps illuminate situations (Cooper, Brandon, & Lindberg, 1998; Guba & Lincoln, 1982; Lincoln & Guba, 1985) . They recognize that the process of moving in and out of data collection, striving to identify the salient patterns, captures the attention of the key investigators. The intensity of being immersed in the site often causes the focus on the phenomenon to be so specific that researchers need to “talk through”their interpretations with interested peers to verify their conclusions. These planned conversations assist them in affirming, confirming, and challenging their findings (Guba & Lincoln; Lincoln & Guba) .  \nAlthough the term peer debriefing is more often seen in qualitative research than in teacher education literature, as professors who prepare teachers, we wondered if teachers utilize the process in their teaching practices even if they do not know or use the term. This driving question sparked an interest in us to find an answer and change the trend to more integrated and purposeful use of peer debriefing and to bring the term a more common understanding among  \nteachers. From our experiences, we see that teachers often serve as disinterested peers for eachother. They may help each other talk through instructional practices, solve problems, and explore new theories as they learn together. However, like in the story above, many times teachers are isolated in their own classrooms and do not immediately turn to each other for support because of time constraints or other issues. According to Heider (2005), attrition among teacher educators is an increasing problem in the United States. Studies continue to reveal that quality beginning teachers leave teaching within the first few years due to feelings of isolation (Heider) .  \nIn our desire to support","cbCaiilMalI6UVZR","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiilMalI6UVZR","pdf",591633,"English","# Introduction\n# An Overview of Peer Debriefing\n## Purpose and value for educators\n## How it supports reflection and objectivity","[{\"question\":\"What is peer debriefing in the context of this article?\",\"answer\":\"Peer debriefing is described as a process where teachers share their inquiry or classroom thinking with a trusted, knowledgeable but disinterested peer to explore aspects that might otherwise remain implicit.\"},{\"question\":\"Why can peer debriefing help teachers improve their instruction?\",\"answer\":\"It supports educators by providing outside perspective, enabling them to recall additional facts, shift toward more objective critique, and refine or revise their evaluations of classroom events and outcomes.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the article suggest peer debriefing occurs in teacher practice?\",\"answer\":\"Teachers may function as disinterested peers for one another by discussing instructional practices, solving problems, and exploring new theories, although isolation and time constraints can limit this support.\"}]","Peer Debriefing: Teachers’ Reflective Practices for Professional Growth | PDF",1792089222,25]