[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-325982-105":59,"doc-detail-325982-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","partial-pell-supplemental-approved-in-marathon-senate-sessions-partial-update","PARTIAL PELL SUPPLEMENTAL APPROVED IN MARATHON SENATE SESSIONS - Partial Update","","Senate approval of a fiscal 1986 supplemental appropriations bill would add $146 million to the underfunded Pell Grant program, after rescinding a provision shifting over $80 million in federal research funds to specific Defense Department projects at selected colleges. The Pell shortfall is estimated at $370 million, with projections that without further action up to 790,000 eligible students could see reductions or eliminations. The Senate and House versions must be reconciled, and broader opposition centers on merit, competition, and peer review.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/partial-pell-supplemental-approved-in-marathon-senate-sessions-partial-update/325982/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/partial-pell-supplemental-approved-in-marathon-senate-sessions-partial-update/325982.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Seraphina","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What did the Senate approve regarding Pell Grants?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The Senate approved a fiscal 1986 supplemental appropriations bill that adds $146 million to the underfunded Pell Grant program.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Why did the Senate rescind the provision affecting defense research funds?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"It rescinded a provision that would transfer more than $80 million to specific Defense Department research projects at selected institutions, which critics said bypassed competitive and peer review processes.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What could happen to Pell-eligible students if no supplemental is approved?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Education Department officials predict that some 790,000 Pell-eligible students could have their grants reduced or eliminated entirely.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},325982,1790053851,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962075114101,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/e000253a75eb197efd?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1780044092746381165","Vol.14,No。111  \nTuesday,June 10,1986  \n# PARTIAL PELL SUPPLEMENTAL APPROVED IN MARATHON SENATE SESSION\n\nAs expected,the Senate late Friday approved a fiscal 1986 supplemental appro-priations bi1l that would add $146 million to the underfunded Pell Grant pro-gram this year.  \nIn addition,the Senate rescinded a provision that would have transferred morethan $80 million in federal funds to a number of Defense Department researchprojects at specific colleges and universities.The plan,Included in theSenate Appropriations Committee package,was opposed by a number of senators,who said the projects bypassed the usual competitive and peer review process.  \nApproved 71-8 after late-night sessions Thursday and Friday,the $3.9 billionsupplemental bill,H.R。4151,now must be reconciled with the House's $1.7 bil-lion version.The House measure would not include a Pell Grant supplemental.  \nThe Pell Grant program is facing a funding shortfall estimated at $370 million.According to Senate documents,the $146 million approved by the Senate would\"restore Pell Grants to more than 100,000 students who otherwise would have hadtheir awards eliminated\"by a linear reduction formula planned for academicyear 1986-87,and would add funds to grants that had been slated for reduction.  \nGrants EndangeredShould no supplemental be approved,Education Depart-ment officials predict that some 790,000 Pell-eligible students would havetheir grants reduced or eliminated entirely.  \nHigher education organizations have spent several months attempting to shore upPell Grant funding.\"We are hopeful the [House and Senate]conferees will ap-prove the supplemental,\"said Lawrence Zaglaniczny,assistant director for con-gressional liaison for the American Council on Education(ACE)。He added thatACE is advocating that conferees approve an additional $69 millon in supple-mentals for the financially strapped program.  \nBy adding $69 million more to the Pell Grant program,for a total supplementalof $215million,Congress could wipe out the portion of the shortfali that hasgrown over the past several fiscal years due to funding miscalculations in ED'sbudgets.What remains of the $370 million Pell Grant shortfall would be the$154 million sliced March 1 when Gramm-Rudman-Hollings cuts.took effect.  \nMany higher education advocates also are pleased with the Senate's decision tostrike the provision that would have earmarked $80 million in DoD researchfunds to 10 specified institutions.The amendment,cosponsored by Sen.JohnDanforth,R-Mo.,and 21 other senators,passed by voice vote after a motion totable failed,40-58。(more)  \nJune 10,1986  \n# PARTIAL PELL SUPPLEMENTAL APPROVED IN MARATHON SENATE SESSIONS(Cont.)\n\n\"The issue really is one of merit and competition for the spending of researchdollars or instead whether research dollars should be spent by the Appropria-tions Committee…on the basis of political logrolling,\"Danforth said lastweek.\"This process of earmarking research money in appropriations bills isstrongly opposed both by the administration and by the academic and scientificcommunity.\"  \nSen.William Proxmire,D-Wis.,during the appropriations committee markup ofthe bill,had attempted to block the earmarking of funds to specified insti-tutions.His proposal failed after several senators criticized the process ofpeer review(HED,May 19)。  \nOpposition EmergesYet,by the time the bil1 made it to the Senate floorlast week,a strong coalition against the earmarking had formed.ACE,theAssociation sofcAmerican Universities(AAU),the National Association of StateUniversities and Land-Grant Colleges(NASULGC),the National Academy of Sci-ences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science supported theDanforth amendment,as did the Reagan administration.  \nIn a letter to Sen.Tom Harkin,D-Iowa,AAU President Robert Rosenzweig andNASULGC President Robert Clodius said that,if the research projects werefunded,\"pressures on other institutions to seek direct funding for researchand research facilities","cbCaifa28GNjoKSZ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifa28GNjoKSZ","pdf",1230748,"English","# PARTIAL PELL SUPPLEMENTAL APPROVED IN MARATHON SENATE SESSIONS\n## Senate supplemental approval and rescinded earmark provision\n## Funding shortfall impact on Pell eligible students\n## Advocacy positions and merit-based research funding debate\n## Administrative cost rules and conference consideration\n# BANKERS HIGHLIGHT FRUSTRATION WITH GSL PROGRAM IN NEN SURVEY","[{\"question\":\"What did the Senate approve regarding Pell Grants?\",\"answer\":\"The Senate approved a fiscal 1986 supplemental appropriations bill that adds $146 million to the underfunded Pell Grant program.\"},{\"question\":\"Why did the Senate rescind the provision affecting defense research funds?\",\"answer\":\"It rescinded a provision that would transfer more than $80 million to specific Defense Department research projects at selected institutions, which critics said bypassed competitive and peer review processes.\"},{\"question\":\"What could happen to Pell-eligible students if no supplemental is approved?\",\"answer\":\"Education Department officials predict that some 790,000 Pell-eligible students could have their grants reduced or eliminated entirely.\"}]","PARTIAL PELL SUPPLEMENTAL APPROVED IN MARATHON SENATE SESSIONS - Partial Update | PDF",1789971893,13]