[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-599430-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-599430-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","opinions-of-montenegrin-university-students-and-teachers-about-plagiarism-and-its-prevention","Opinions of Montenegrin University Students and Teachers about Plagiarism and its Prevention","","The research paper investigates opinions of Montenegrin university students and teachers on plagiarism and prevention strategies. Using qualitative methods, it presents three case studies and gathers open-ended responses from 145 participants, including bachelor, master, and doctoral students as well as university teachers. Thematic analysis shows serious concern when academic stakeholders commit plagiarism, alongside a more lenient view toward ghostwriters. Participants call for academic writing training and regular awareness sessions on academic integrity.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/opinions-of-montenegrin-university-students-and-teachers-about-plagiarism-and-its-prevention/599430/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/opinions-of-montenegrin-university-students-and-teachers-about-plagiarism-and-its-prevention/599430.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"WPS_1790064749","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":33},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"How was the study conducted to explore views on plagiarism?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The study used qualitative techniques with three case studies and open-ended questions. Written questionnaires were completed by 145 participants, including students and university teachers.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"What attitudes did participants show toward plagiarism by different academic actors?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"Participants treated plagiarism seriously when academic stakeholders committed it. They expressed a more lenient attitude toward ghostwriters.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"What prevention actions do participants consider necessary?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"They emphasized the need for training in academic writing to improve confidence and reduce copying from others. They also recommended awareness sessions focused on academic integrity.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},599430,1792189353,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":33,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},3985747859154,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","DOI: [https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1570](https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1570)  \nOpinions of Montenegrin University Students and Teachers about Plagiarism and its Prevention  \nDijana Vučković*1, Sanja Peković2, Rajka Đoković3, Marijana Blečić4 and Jovana Janinović2  \n• This research paper aims to identify the opinions of university students and teachers about plagiarism and how to prevent it. We employed qualitative techniques, providing three case studies to participants and asking open-ended questions based on these cases. One hundred and forty-five people participated in this study, including bachelor, master, and doctoral students and university teachers. We performed a thematic analysis of the text received from the participants’ responses. The results show that the participants were serious about plagiarism if academic stakeholders commit it; however, they expressed a lenient attitude toward ghostwriters. They also felt there was a need to provide training in academic writing for them to feel confident about their writing and not copy from others. Some awareness sessions on academic integrity should also be conducted.  \nKeywords: plagiarism detection, plagiarism punishment, student, university teacher  \n1 *Corresponding Author. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro; [dijanav@ucg.ac.me](dijanav@ucg.ac.me).  \n2 Faculty of Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.  \n3 Faculty of Law, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.  \n4 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.  \n156 opinions of montenegrin university students and teachers about plagiarism ...  \nMnenja študentov in univerzitetnih učiteljev Univerze v Črni gori o plagiatorstvu in njegovem preprečevanju  \nDijana Vučković, Sanja Peković, Rajka Đoković, Marijana Blečić in Jovana Janinović  \n• Namen tega članka je ugotoviti mnenja univerzitetnih študentov in učiteljev o plagiatorstvu in njegovem preprečevanju. Uporabili smo kvalitativne tehnike, tako da smo udeležencem ponudili tri študije primerov in na njihovi podlagi postavili vprašanja odprtega tipa. V raziskavi jesodelovalo sto petinštirideset oseb, med njimi dodiplomski, magistrski in doktorski študentje ter univerzitetni učitelji. Izvedli smo tematsko analizo besedil, ki smo jih prejeli iz odgovorov udeležencev. Rezultatikažejo, da so udeleženci resno obravnavali plagiatorstvo, če so ga zagrešili akademski deležniki, vendar so izrazili prizanesljiv odnos do t. i. ghostwriterjev oziroma piscev, ki pišejo v imenu drugih. Menili so tudi, da je treba zagotoviti usposabljanje na področju akademskega pisanja, da bi se počutili samozavestno pri pisanju in da ne bi prepisovali od drugih. Izvesti bi bilo treba tudi nekaj srečanj za ozaveščanje o akademski integriteti.  \nKljučne besede: odkrivanje plagiatorstva, kaznovanje plagiatorstva,študent, univerzitetni učitelj  \nIntroduction  \nPlagiarism has become one of the most dangerous threats to the quality of research and education across different regions and cultures (Glendinning, 2016b; Thomas, 2017; Vučković et al., 2020) . In this paper, plagiarism is understood to be ‘presenting work/ideas taken from other sources without proper acknowledgment’ (Tauginienė et al., 2018, p. 35) or ‘presenting someone else’swords and/or ideas as your own without appropriate attribution’ (Ellis et al., 2018, p. 1). The description ofFishman (2009) is more accurate:  \n“Plagiarism occurs when someone uses words, ideas, or work products attributable to another identifiable person or source without attributing the work to the source from which it was obtained in a situation in which there is a legitimate expectation of original authorship in order to obtain some benefit, credit, or gain which need not be monetary.”(p. 5) .  \nTherefore, plagiarism is breaking an academic community’s ethical rules that relate to authorship. It is a type of cheating because ideas, research results or other ","cbCaimN5mMViAwEQ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimN5mMViAwEQ","pdf",234221,29,"English","# Introduction\n# Theoretical Background\n## Identifying the Type of Plagiarism","[{\"question\":\"How was the study conducted to explore views on plagiarism?\",\"answer\":\"The study used qualitative techniques with three case studies and open-ended questions. Written questionnaires were completed by 145 participants, including students and university teachers.\"},{\"question\":\"What attitudes did participants show toward plagiarism by different academic actors?\",\"answer\":\"Participants treated plagiarism seriously when academic stakeholders committed it. They expressed a more lenient attitude toward ghostwriters.\"},{\"question\":\"What prevention actions do participants consider necessary?\",\"answer\":\"They emphasized the need for training in academic writing to improve confidence and reduce copying from others. They also recommended awareness sessions focused on academic integrity.\"}]","Opinions of Montenegrin University Students and Teachers about Plagiarism and its Prevention | PDF",1792088755,73]