[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-586757-105":59,"doc-detail-586757-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","open-educational-resources-oer-in-texas-higher-education-2019","Open Educational Resources (OER) in Texas Higher Education, 2019","","Independent survey findings commissioned in 2019 by DigiTex with THECB and ISKME examine OER programs, policies, and practices across Texas higher education. Based on responses from 100 of 158 public and private institutions, results show growing commitment: 38% have formal OER initiatives and 51% plan future implementation. Key themes include affordability and access as main drivers, faculty training and incentives, centralized OER roles, and collaborative efforts involving libraries and partnerships, alongside limited, non-standardized OER discourse and early-stage impact data.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/open-educational-resources-oer-in-texas-higher-education-2019/586757/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/open-educational-resources-oer-in-texas-higher-education-2019/586757.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Sarah ","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":24},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What was the purpose of the 2019 survey on OER in Texas higher education?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The survey was commissioned to examine the landscape of OER programs, policies, and practices across higher education institutions in Texas.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How many institutions participated, and what does the participation indicate about OER commitment?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Responses came from 100 institutions out of 158. Results show growing commitment, with 38% having formal OER programs and initiatives and 51% interested in implementing OER policies or programs.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What are the main priorities and drivers highlighted by the survey?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The report identifies affordability and access as key drivers, along with faculty OER training and incentive programs as major priorities for institutions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},586757,1792165872,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":24,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962085320529,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","This report is based on an independent survey commissioned in 2019 by the Digital Higher Education Consortium of Texas (DigiTex), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB), and the Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education (ISKME) .  \nThe cover page map denotes the 51 Texas institutions of higher education reporting that they have OER policies or programs in place or under development in 2019.  \nUnless otherwise noted, this report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  \nPlease cite this report as follows: Jimes, C., Karaglani, A., Petrides, L., Rios, J., Sebesta, J., & Torre, K. (2019) .  \nOpen Educational Resources (OER) in Texas Higher Education, 2019. Austin, TX: Digital Higher Education Consortium of Texas and Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board; Half Moon Bay, CA: Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education.  \nAcknowledgements  \nThe authors wish to thank the 100 participating institutions for completing the survey. We would also like to thank the three institutions that tested the survey, alongside the THECB review committee, for providing valuable feedback to inform the survey’s design. Report design is by Daya Ceglia.  \nContents  \n\n| Executive Summary 4 |\n| --- |\n| Definitions 5 |\n| Introduction 6 |\n| Survey Approach 7 |\n| Findings 9 |\n| Conclusions 23 |\n| Notes 24 |\n| Survey Instrument 25 |\n\nTexas Higher Education Coordinating Board 35  \nExecutive Summary  \nThis report presents the results of an independent survey commissioned by the Digital Higher Education Consortium of Texas (DigiTex, formerly the Virtual College of Texas), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB), to examine the landscape of OER programs, policies, and practices at higher education institutions in Texas.  \nThe survey was administered in May 2019 to all 158 two-and four-year public and private institutions across the state. Responses from 100 institutions paint a picture of growing commitment to OER, with 38% of institutions having formal programs and initiatives in place to support OER, and with 51% either in the process of or interested in implementing OER programs or policies in the future. The survey findings further reveal insights into specific priorities, practices, and perceptions surrounding OER across the Texas higher education landscape, including:  \n● Affordability and access are key drivers of OER, though teaching and learning benefits also play a role;  \n● The development of faculty OER training and incentive programs are key priorities for institutions;  \n● OER-based courses are prevalent across Texas and likely to scale, and the development of full, OERbased programs are also underway, primarily at the state’s two-year institutions;  \n● OER initiatives are funded primarily through internal budgets;  \n● Institutions are centralizing their OER work through dedicated roles, offices, and committees;  \n● OER success is a collaborative effort, with libraries, students, and cross-institutional partnerships playing important roles;  \n● OER discourse is limited and non-standardized within and across institutions, and the majority of institutions do not have a written definition of OER;  \n● Data collection on the pedagogical and financial impacts of OER is nascent, yet promising; and  \n● Institutions view lack of faculty awareness and conflicts with existing priorities as principal barriers to OER adoption.  \nThe report concludes that those leading the way in OER across the state are appointing dedicated committees to shepherd the OER work at their institutions, allocating resources to OER training for faculty and for the development of OER, and collecting data on the extent and impact of OER use. A small number of bellwether institutions also are sharing their OER externally with other institutions in national OER repositories, articulating concrete open licensing policies in their intellectual p","cbCaiuiyD5wzmJqL","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuiyD5wzmJqL","pdf",1937682,35,"English","# Executive Summary\n## Definitions\n## Introduction\n## Survey Approach\n## Findings\n## Conclusions\n## Notes\n## Survey Instrument","[{\"question\":\"What was the purpose of the 2019 survey on OER in Texas higher education?\",\"answer\":\"The survey was commissioned to examine the landscape of OER programs, policies, and practices across higher education institutions in Texas.\"},{\"question\":\"How many institutions participated, and what does the participation indicate about OER commitment?\",\"answer\":\"Responses came from 100 institutions out of 158. Results show growing commitment, with 38% having formal OER programs and initiatives and 51% interested in implementing OER policies or programs.\"},{\"question\":\"What are the main priorities and drivers highlighted by the survey?\",\"answer\":\"The report identifies affordability and access as key drivers, along with faculty OER training and incentive programs as major priorities for institutions.\"}]","Open Educational Resources (OER) in Texas Higher Education, 2019 | PDF",1792059230,88]