[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-181456-105":59,"doc-detail-181456-en":124},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":117,"head_meta":119,"extra_data":121,"updated_unix":123},105,"en","ont-arviointikriteerit-2021-amk","ONT-arviointikriteerit 2021 AMK","","Evaluation criteria matrix for AMK-level thesis assessment, presenting performance standards from Fail through levels 1–5. Criteria cover scope definition and alignment with the student’s studies, theoretical framework concepts and sourcing quality, method selection and documentation, data collection and analysis/process/project justification and competency, thesis relevance to working life, and credibility of results together with ethical recommendations. The scale defines progressive expectations from incomplete or incorrect work to clear, well-defined goals, analytical evaluation, transparent reporting, and competent professional use of sources.",{"@graph":69,"@context":116},[70,84,99],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/ont-arviointikriteerit-2021-amk/181456/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"author":86,"headline":65,"publisher":89,"fileFormat":92,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":93,"datePublished":93,"encodingFormat":92,"isAccessibleForFree":94,"interactionStatistic":95},"DigitalDocument",{"name":87,"@type":88},"Angel","Person",{"url":74,"name":90,"@type":91},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":96,"interactionType":97,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":98},"ViewAction",{"@type":100,"mainEntity":101},"FAQPage",[102,108,112],{"name":103,"@type":104,"acceptedAnswer":105},"What does the evaluation scale (Fail to 1–5) represent?","Question",{"text":106,"@type":107},"It represents increasing performance quality. “Fail” indicates missing or incorrect requirements, while level 5 reflects clear, well-defined goals and competent, analytical work.","Answer",{"name":109,"@type":104,"acceptedAnswer":110},"Which aspects are assessed for the theoretical framework?",{"text":111,"@type":107},"The framework’s breadth and clarity of essential concepts, the quality and relevance of sources, and whether the student uses and assesses sources professionally rather than mechanically.",{"name":113,"@type":104,"acceptedAnswer":114},"How are ethics and credibility of results evaluated?",{"text":115,"@type":107},"The criteria require documented reliability and quality, clear reporting on reaching results, respectful consideration of ethical recommendations, and analytical or reflective evaluation with transparent disclosure.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":118,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":90,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":120,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":122,"site_id":62},181456,1788344771,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":125},{"doc_id":122,"user_id":126,"nickname":87,"user_avatar":127,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":128,"file_id":129,"file_url":130,"file_type":131,"file_size":132,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":19,"language":133,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":134,"faqs":135,"seo_title":136,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":123,"read_time":52},687207412472,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","| Scope of evaluation | Fail | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Definition of\u003Cbr>the scope of\u003Cbr>the study and goals\u003Cbr>Weight 1 | Student does not justify the relation between the scope of the study and his or her own studies. Incomplete objectives/research problems/assignments. | Student demonstrates the relation between the scope of the study and his or her own studies.\u003Cbr>Objectives/research problems/assignments should have been more complete. | The scope of the study is based on working life and related to student’s studies.\u003Cbr>Objectives/research problem/assignments should have been clarified. | The scope is based on working life and related to the studies. Relatively clear objectives / research problems/assignments. | The scope meets the needs of the working life and studies. Clear and well-defined objectives/research hypotheses/assignments. | The scope is topical, relevant and meets the needs of the job market and studies. Clear and well-defined\u003Cbr>goals/ research hypotheses/assignments. |\n| Conceptsand sources in the theoretical\u003Cbr>framework\u003Cbr>Weigth 2 | Very narrow theoretical framework with no description of essential concepts. Very few and/or poor sources. A considerable quantity of direct quotations or plagiarism. | Narrow and imprecise theoretical framework. Few and partially outdated sources. Sources cited mechanically. | Narrow theoretical framework and description of concepts. Few and/or limited sources. Sources cited mechanically. | Theoretical framework and essential concepts based on previous research. Various sources used, although partially mechanically. The student analyzes some of the\u003Cbr>sources. | Theoretical framework and concepts documented based on a wide range of previous studies. The student knows how to use sources of good quality, related to the topic, professionally without referring to them mechanically. The student assesses the sources convincingly. | Theoretical framework and concepts defined based on a wide range of essential topical data. The student applies sources of good quality, related to the topic, professionally in diverse ways. The student assesses convincingly and critically the sources selected. |\n| Scope of evaluation | Fail | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |\n| Selection of the methods, | No description of methods chosen, or incorrect description or | Methods are documented but irregularly. Incomplete | Methods documented but irregularly. | Methods documented and the student knows | Methods chosen are documented and the student knows how to | Methods chosen are justified and presented |\n\n\n| documentation and use\u003Cbr>Weight 2 | incorrect use of selected and documented methods. No description of data collection/process/project and no justifications. | description of data collection/process/project and no justifications of choices made. | Superficial documentation of data\u003Cbr>collection/process/project with no justifications of choices made. | how to use them. Data collection and analysis or process/project documented and partially justified. | use them. Data collection and analysis or process/project documented in multiple ways with justified choices. | analytically and used competently.\u003Cbr>Data collection and analysis/process/project documented analytically in various ways.\u003Cbr>Justified choices. |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Relevance of the thesis\u003Cbr>Weight 2 | The objectives set are not reached.\u003Cbr>Implementation and output are not credible in the working life. The work/results are not relevant due to deficiencies. | The objectives set partially reached. Implementation and output only partially credible in real working life. The work/the results could potentially be relevant. Feedback from the mandator points out clear deficiencies in the thesis. | Objectives set are partially reached. Implementation and results only partially credible in working life. The work/results can be referred to partially. Feedback from the mandator focuses on incom","cbCaid2JDTJ7L1zF","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaid2JDTJ7L1zF","pdf",111711,"English","# Scope of evaluation\n## Definition of the scope of the study and goals\n## Concepts and sources in the theoretical framework\n## Selection of the methods, documentation and use\n## Relevance of the thesis\n## Credibility of the results and ethical recommendations\n## Reporting and structure","[{\"question\":\"What does the evaluation scale (Fail to 1–5) represent?\",\"answer\":\"It represents increasing performance quality. “Fail” indicates missing or incorrect requirements, while level 5 reflects clear, well-defined goals and competent, analytical work.\"},{\"question\":\"Which aspects are assessed for the theoretical framework?\",\"answer\":\"The framework’s breadth and clarity of essential concepts, the quality and relevance of sources, and whether the student uses and assesses sources professionally rather than mechanically.\"},{\"question\":\"How are ethics and credibility of results evaluated?\",\"answer\":\"The criteria require documented reliability and quality, clear reporting on reaching results, respectful consideration of ethical recommendations, and analytical or reflective evaluation with transparent disclosure.\"}]","ONT-arviointikriteerit 2021 AMK | PDF"]