[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-627166-105":59,"doc-detail-627166-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","oak-national-academy-202021-evaluation-report-july-2021","Oak National Academy 2020/21 Evaluation Report - July 2021","","Oak National Academy partnered with ImpactEd to evaluate how Oak resources affected teachers, the wider education sector, and pupils across Spring and Summer terms of the 2020/21 academic year, covering partial school closures and full pupil returns. Findings come from a mixed-methods design: a national Teacher Tapp survey, quantitative participation (911), qualitative interviews and focus groups (40), and Oak platform analytics. The report compares Oak and non-Oak users on pupil attainment, teacher workload and wellbeing, and resource implementation, planning, and engagement outcomes.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/oak-national-academy-202021-evaluation-report-july-2021/627166/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/oak-national-academy-202021-evaluation-report-july-2021/627166.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Himbo","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What was the purpose of the Oak National Academy 2020/21 evaluation report?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"To understand the impact Oak National Academy resources had during the Spring and Summer terms of 2020/21, including usage during partial closures and after full pupil returns. It focuses on outcomes for teachers, the sector, and pupils through a mixed-methods evaluation.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How was the evaluation conducted?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The report uses a mixed-methods approach, including a quantitative survey with 911 participants, qualitative interviews and focus groups with 40 participants, and Oak platform analytics. Data collection involved teachers and school leaders.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How did teacher usage of Oak change after pupils returned in person?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Teachers reported that direct lesson delivery declined after returning to in-person teaching. Instead, Oak was predominantly used for cover classes, supporting self-isolating pupils, and as a CPD tool to improve teachers’ lesson planning and delivery.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},627166,1792656575,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},687197100911,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/a000239b6f1da00475?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1785132997149421697","Oak National Academy  \n2020/21 Evaluation Report  \nJuly 2021  \nContents  \n1. Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................................3  \n2. Evaluation Methodology ..........................................................................................................................................6  \nOutcomes .........................................................................................................................................................................6  \nEvaluation Design ........................................................................................................................................................8  \nSurvey: design, sample, and analysis .................................................................................................................8  \nQualitative work: design, sample, and analysis.......................................................................................... 10  \n3. Implementation and usage .................................................................................................................................. 14  \n4. Impact on Teachers .................................................................................................................................................. 19  \nKey Findings................................................................................................................................................................. 19  \nImpact on teacher workload ................................................................................................................................ 19  \nImpact on teacher wellbeing ...............................................................................................................................24  \n5. Impact on the Sector ...............................................................................................................................................26  \nImpact on long-term teaching practice ..........................................................................................................29  \nQuality of the resources.........................................................................................................................................32  \n6. Impact on Pupils ........................................................................................................................................................34  \nKey Findings.................................................................................................................................................................34  \nImpact on pupil performance..............................................................................................................................34  \nImpact on pupil engagement ..............................................................................................................................38  \n1  \n1. Executive Summary  \nOak National Academy has partnered with ImpactEd to understand the impact that Oak National Academy’s resources have had over the Spring and Summer terms of the 2020/21 academic year, reflecting both on usage of Oak during partial school closures and following full pupil returns. During June 2021, a Teacher Tapp survey showed that 56% of teachers nationally had used Oak in the past six months, so it is important to understand the impact it has had on them, their pupils, and their wider community. This report presents the findings of a mixed methods evaluation, which has subsequently formed the basis of a set of recommendations that ImpactEd has discussed with and presented to Oak National Academy outside of this report.  \nThe findings summarised in this report are based on a mixed methods approach, including: a quantitative survey with 911 participants, qualitative interviews and focus groups with","cbCaiq5kBMmm3n3a","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiq5kBMmm3n3a","pdf",1032196,41,"English","# Executive Summary\n# Evaluation Methodology\n## Outcomes\n## Evaluation Design\n## Survey: design, sample, and analysis\n## Qualitative work: design, sample, and analysis\n# Implementation and usage\n# Impact on Teachers\n## Key Findings\n## Impact on teacher workload\n## Impact on teacher wellbeing\n# Impact on the Sector\n## Impact on long-term teaching practice\n## Quality of the resources\n# Impact on Pupils\n## Key Findings\n## Impact on pupil performance\n## Impact on pupil engagement","[{\"question\":\"What was the purpose of the Oak National Academy 2020/21 evaluation report?\",\"answer\":\"To understand the impact Oak National Academy resources had during the Spring and Summer terms of 2020/21, including usage during partial closures and after full pupil returns. It focuses on outcomes for teachers, the sector, and pupils through a mixed-methods evaluation.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the evaluation conducted?\",\"answer\":\"The report uses a mixed-methods approach, including a quantitative survey with 911 participants, qualitative interviews and focus groups with 40 participants, and Oak platform analytics. Data collection involved teachers and school leaders.\"},{\"question\":\"How did teacher usage of Oak change after pupils returned in person?\",\"answer\":\"Teachers reported that direct lesson delivery declined after returning to in-person teaching. Instead, Oak was predominantly used for cover classes, supporting self-isolating pupils, and as a CPD tool to improve teachers’ lesson planning and delivery.\"}]","Oak National Academy 2020/21 Evaluation Report - July 2021 | PDF",1792548873,103]