[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-160483-en":3,"doc-seo-160483-105":31,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":92},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":21,"is_downloadable":21,"audit_status":21,"page_count":22,"language":23,"language_code":24,"site_id":25,"html_lang":24,"table_of_contents":26,"faqs":27,"seo_title":28,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":29,"read_time":30},160483,687197207639,"Asher","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd",8,"Research & Report","NYSBA-Report on Advancing Diversity - September 2023 - Executive Committee Adopted September 20, 2023","Report and Recommendations of the New York State Bar Association Task Force on Advancing Diversity (September 2023) sets out a post-SFFA decision path for law schools, other higher education institutions, private employers, and the judiciary. It explains why diversity matters across legal education, corporate and law firm workplaces, and judicial institutions, and identifies admissions and policy barriers affecting access. It provides risk-focused guidance for employers and practical strategies for courts, including communication, bias training, community engagement, and data collection and analysis.","Report and Recommendations of the New York State Bar Association  \nTask Force on Advancing Diversity  \nSeptember 2023  \nAdopted by the Executive Committee on September 20, 2023.  \nREPORT OF THE NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TASK FORCE ON ADVANCING DIVERSITY  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \nI. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................3  \nII. THE IMPORTANCE OF DIVERSITY .................................................................7  \nA. Diversity in Law Schools and Other Higher Education Institutions .................7  \nB. Diversity in Corporations and Law Firms ....................................................... 14  \nC. Diversity in the Judiciary ................................................................................20  \nIII. IMPLICATIONS OF THE SFFA DECISION FOR LAW SCHOOLS AND OTHER HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS...........................................24  \nA. Institutional Goals and Values ........................................................................24  \nB. Permissible Processes Following the SFFA Decision .....................................25  \nC. Policy Barriers in Admissions Processes ........................................................28  \n1. Standardized Testing Requirements ................................................................29  \n2. Legacy, Athlete and Donor Preferences ..........................................................31  \n3. Tuition and Educational Resource Costs.........................................................32  \n4. Outreach, Enrollment and Student Success Barriers .......................................35  \nD. Broad Educational Institution Strategy ...........................................................36  \nIV. IMPLICATIONS OF THE SFFA DECISION FOR PRIVATE EMPLOYERS: CORPORATIONS AND LAW FIRMS ...............................................................40  \nA. Legal Framework and Current Landscape ......................................................40  \nB. Legal Risks of Dialing Back DEI Initiatives ...................................................52  \nC. Guidance for Private Employers .....................................................................56  \nV. IMPLICATIONS OF THE SFFA DECISION FOR THE JUDICIARY .........75  \nA. Strategy and Leadership Communication .......................................................75  \nB. Bias Training and Educational Outreach......................................................... 80  \nC. Engage with the Community and Local Organizations................................... 81  \nD. Data Collection and Analysis .......................................................................... 83  \nCONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 85  \nMembers of the Task Force on Advancing Diversity Task Force Co-Chairs  \nJeh C. Johnson  \nBrad S. Karp  \nLoretta E. Lynch  \nAcademia Working Group Co-chairs: Dean Gillian Lester & Dean Alicia Ouellette  \nDean Matthew Diller  \nLara Ann Flath  \nEric Jonathan Friedman  \nDavid J. Greenwald  \nMarvin Krislov  \nKapil Longani Dean Troy A. McKenzie  \nBusiness Working Group Co-chairs: Michael Delikat & Julie Swidler  \nBarbara Lynn Becker Roger Blissett  \nT. Andrew Brown  \nAnne L. Clark  \nDeneen Donnley  \nLissette Duran  \nStacey Friedman  \nJose Ramon Gonzalez  \nEric Grossman  \nKimberley D. Harris  \nAdam Klein  \nSandra Leung  \nAnthony V. Lupo Zakiyyah Salim-Williams Deirdre Stanley  \nLiza M. Velazquez  \nAlex Dumas  \nChiara Genovese  \nRichard Katz  \nMembers of the Task Force on Advancing Diversity Law Firm Working Group  \nCo-chairs: Jonathan Katz & Jill Rosenberg  \nBradley J. Butwin  \nPeter A. Furci  \nMichael Gerstenzang  \nJulie H. Jones  \nAdam T. Klein  \nKim Koopersmith  \nAlden Millard  \nJesse Solomon  \nKathleen M. Sweet  \nCaren Ulrich Stacy  \nBarry M. Wolf  \nJudiciary Working Group  \nCo-chairs: Hon. Cheryl E. Chambers & Hon. Edwina G. Richardson-Mend","cbCaihJxJlBvJfKS","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihJxJlBvJfKS","pdf",1393218,2,1,97,"English","en",105,"# Executive Summary\n## The Importance of Diversity\n## Diversity in Law Schools and Other Higher Education Institutions\n## Diversity in Corporations and Law Firms\n## Diversity in the Judiciary\n## Implications of the SFFA Decision for Law Schools and Other Higher Education Institutions\n## Implications of the SFFA Decision for Private Employers: Corporations and Law Firms\n## Implications of the SFFA Decision for the Judiciary\n# Conclusion","[{\"question\":\"What decision the report addresses, and why does it matter for diversity efforts?\",\"answer\":\"The report addresses the implications of the SFFA decision, focusing on how it affects access and diversity across education, employment, and the judiciary. It aims to provide guidance on lawful, practical next steps after the ruling.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the report connect diversity to legal education, corporations, and law firms, and the judiciary?\",\"answer\":\"It outlines the importance of diversity in law schools and higher education, in corporate and law firm environments, and in the judiciary. The report frames diversity as beneficial to training, organizational performance, and public confidence in justice.\"},{\"question\":\"What guidance does the report offer to private employers regarding DEI initiatives after the SFFA decision?\",\"answer\":\"It identifies legal risks of scaling back DEI efforts and offers guidance for private employers on how to proceed. The focus is on aligning employer actions with the relevant legal framework and current landscape.\"}]","NYSBA-Report on Advancing Diversity - September 2023 - Executive Committee Adopted September 20, 2023 | PDF",1788064039,244,{"code":4,"msg":32,"data":33},"ok",{"site_id":25,"language":24,"slug":34,"title":13,"keywords":35,"description":14,"schema_data":36,"social_meta":87,"head_meta":89,"extra_data":91,"updated_unix":29},"nysba-report-on-advancing-diversity-september-2023-adopted-september-20-2023","",{"@graph":37,"@context":86},[38,54,69],{"@type":39,"itemListElement":40},"BreadcrumbList",[41,45,48,51],{"item":42,"name":43,"@type":44,"position":21},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":46,"name":47,"@type":44,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":49,"name":12,"@type":44,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":52,"name":13,"@type":44,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/nysba-report-on-advancing-diversity-september-2023-adopted-september-20-2023/160483/",4,{"url":52,"name":13,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":13,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":24,"description":14,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":63,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":64,"interactionStatistic":65},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":42,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-04","2026-08-30",true,{"@type":66,"interactionType":67,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":68},"ViewAction",{"@type":70,"mainEntity":71},"FAQPage",[72,78,82],{"name":73,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":75},"What decision the report addresses, and why does it matter for diversity efforts?","Question",{"text":76,"@type":77},"The report addresses the implications of the SFFA decision, focusing on how it affects access and diversity across education, employment, and the judiciary. It aims to provide guidance on lawful, practical next steps after the ruling.","Answer",{"name":79,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":80},"How does the report connect diversity to legal education, corporations, and law firms, and the judiciary?",{"text":81,"@type":77},"It outlines the importance of diversity in law schools and higher education, in corporate and law firm environments, and in the judiciary. The report frames diversity as beneficial to training, organizational performance, and public confidence in justice.",{"name":83,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":84},"What guidance does the report offer to private employers regarding DEI initiatives after the SFFA decision?",{"text":85,"@type":77},"It identifies legal risks of scaling back DEI efforts and offers guidance for private employers on how to proceed. The focus is on aligning employer actions with the relevant legal framework and current landscape.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":88,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":90,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":25},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":93},[94,98,102,106,111,116,121,124,129,132,136],{"id":21,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":53,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":113,"show_sort_weight":114,"slug":115},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":118,"show_sort_weight":119,"slug":120},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":122,"slug":123},30,"research-report",{"id":125,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":126,"show_sort_weight":127,"slug":128},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":130,"show_sort_weight":127,"slug":131},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":133,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":134,"show_sort_weight":133,"slug":135},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":137,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":47,"category_name":138,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":139},19,"General","general"]