[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31613":3,"doc-seo-31613":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31613,1099513958607,"Jiven","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002390cf8733938c?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1778829742770036399",8,"Research & Report","Numerical Simulation of Ballistic Impact Response on Composite Materials for Different Shape of Projectiles","Ballistic impact resistance of unidirectional E-glass/epoxy laminates is numerically evaluated by simulating 3D specimen and projectile models in ABAQUS/CAE. The study compares four layup configurations with plates impacted by flat, hemispherical, ogival, conical, and spherical projectile nose shapes. Residual velocity and the projectile kinetic energy are plotted across ply orientations and nose geometries to clarify how nose shape influences penetration-related response. The work frames impact damage mechanisms relevant to composite laminates.","cbCaisNdWuoUC6IN","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaisNdWuoUC6IN","pdf",5273481,1,19,"English","en","# Introduction\n## Composite materials and relevance to ballistic impact\n## Damage mechanisms in composites\n## Related work and prior impact models","[{\"question\":\"What materials and loading scenario are simulated in the study?\",\"answer\":\"The study numerically simulates ballistic impact resistance of unidirectional E-glass/epoxy laminates subjected to high-velocity projectile impacts.\"},{\"question\":\"Which projectile nose shapes and laminate layups are compared?\",\"answer\":\"Projectile nose shapes include flat, hemispherical, ogival, conical, and spherical, compared across four layup configurations: [0/90/0/90], [45/-45/45/-45], and their symmetric counterparts.\"},{\"question\":\"How are the impact effects evaluated and compared?\",\"answer\":\"Residual velocities and projectile kinetic energy are plotted for different ply orientations and nose shapes, enabling comparison of the influence of projectile geometry on ballistic response.\"}]",1779829224,48,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"numerical-simulation-of-ballistic-impact-response-on-composite-materials-for-different-shape-of-projectiles","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/numerical-simulation-of-ballistic-impact-response-on-composite-materials-for-different-shape-of-projectiles/31613/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-26",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What materials and loading scenario are simulated in the study?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"The study numerically simulates ballistic impact resistance of unidirectional E-glass/epoxy laminates subjected to high-velocity projectile impacts.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"Which projectile nose shapes and laminate layups are compared?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Projectile nose shapes include flat, hemispherical, ogival, conical, and spherical, compared across four layup configurations: [0/90/0/90], [45/-45/45/-45], and their symmetric counterparts.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"How are the impact effects evaluated and compared?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"Residual velocities and projectile kinetic energy are plotted for different ply orientations and nose shapes, enabling comparison of the influence of projectile geometry on ballistic response.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]