[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-321896-105":59,"doc-detail-321896-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","nothing-and-nothingness-a-treatise-on-the-nature-ofexistence","Nothing and Nothingness - A Treatise on the Nature ofExistence","","A philosophical essay, “Nothing and Nothingness,” examines how concepts of Being relate to “Nothing” through the lens of intra-ontology and related theoretical frameworks. It argues that “be” functions as an application of “entre-etre,” not as ontologically centered truth, and contends that certain thinkers can “peer into” vrai-etre’s essence. The work further critiques anthropocentrism, situating human consciousness as instrumental and aligning “selfish genes” with the notion of humans as Nothings within a broader interaction with Being.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":15,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/nothing-and-nothingness-a-treatise-on-the-nature-ofexistence/321896/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/nothing-and-nothingness-a-treatise-on-the-nature-ofexistence/321896.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Asher","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the essay’s central claim about “etre” and “be”?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It claims there is no true sense of “etre,” and that “be” is merely an application of “entre-etre,” not something ontologically centered on “etre-vrai” or “vrai-etre.”","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the essay relate the idea of “Nothing” to Heidegger’s framework?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It suggests that when Heidegger begins Being and Time, there is something that lends itself to the concept of Nothing, not mainly through methodology, but through intra-ontology and how concepts function within ontological systems.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Why does the essay argue that humans are not anthropocentric?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It states that we have never been anthropocentric because, insofar as consciousness goes, we are tools for that consciousness—linked to the idea of humans as “selfish genes” and as Nothings interacting with the outside through Being.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},321896,1790216060,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":14,"category_name":15,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":36,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},687197207639,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","Nothing and Nothingness  \n# A Treatise on the Nature ofExistence\n\nBy:Georges Leroux  \nI.  \nWhen Heidegger begins Being andTime there is something whichlends itself to the concept of theNothing.It is not so much in  \nHeidegger's methodology whereinthe concept lies but in the aspectof intra-ontology.This view ofontological systems of  \nepistemologies and the Lacanian“Mirror Stage”all seem to dealmore with the concept of entre-etre.I will utilize this termbecause it holds an importantnotion which will join in with myprimary claims.  \nThose claims are that  \naxiomatically speaking,there is notrue sense of “etre”that is,to \"be\"is merely an application of entre-etre and not ontologically centeredon the etre-vrai or vrai-etre.I  \nclaim that those who are in a classof their own and view the worldnot as a simple power model ofFoucault or the hegemonic powerparadigms of Cixous are thosewho can peer into the essence ofthe vrai-etre.This is not to say thatthese theorists are not at all utileor that they inhabit some negativemode in it of themselves,however  \nthis is merely a reflection of howthey are positioned firmly in thegrouping of thinkers who havetheir postulates in the entre-etreworks.With that,they cannotallow for a true \"self\"to be a vrai-etre or true being.  \nMany people will try to find amethodology of analyticalphilosophy to counteract my  \nclaims due to its preponderance ofbeings as something connected tothe status of being as opposed tomerely actions or thoughts.Ireiterate that I am seeking tounderstand and analyze is not that  \nof one's thought in a context but  \nthe opposite.This,I find,lendsitself to a more thorough  \nunderstanding of consequential,epistemic,and ontological veritythat is to be discerned thus.Hence,it may be found that through thismethodology the questions of the\"etats d'etre\"may come to allowfor an in-depth interpretation ofontology in the \"inter\"and “auto”senses of the word without tryingto automatically depend only onexpressions of beings but in  \nsomething based on the being ofBeing.  \nII.  \nNow,there comes a need toexplain that the Dasein of  \nHeidegger is important here in thatthe ontology of Being does nottake into account that we havenever been anthropocentric.Bythis,I mean that insofar as  \nconsciousness goes,we are justtools for that consciousness.Indeed,as Professor Richard  \nDawkins's book suggests,we are aconglomeration of“selfish genes”.I will not try to mold this term forideological purposes that are  \nunintended,however,in this sensewe are just Nothings amd by“We”I mean our material bodies are justa means to interact with the  \noutside by the consciousness wecall Being.  \nThere is a need then to  \nremember that \"the book imitatesthe world,as art imitates nature:by procedures specific to it thataccomplish what nature cannot door can no longer do”(Deleuze andGuattari 5).This and that \"thedifference between the two kindsof memory is not that of twotemporal modes of apprehending","cbCaiagCuXjKx76s","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiagCuXjKx76s","pdf",1378618,"English","# I.\n## Core claims on être and entre-entre\n## Limits of analytical methodology and ontological verity\n# II.\n## Dasein and critique of anthropocentrism\n## Consciousness, selfish genes, and Being","[{\"question\":\"What is the essay’s central claim about “etre” and “be”?\",\"answer\":\"It claims there is no true sense of “etre,” and that “be” is merely an application of “entre-etre,” not something ontologically centered on “etre-vrai” or “vrai-etre.”\"},{\"question\":\"How does the essay relate the idea of “Nothing” to Heidegger’s framework?\",\"answer\":\"It suggests that when Heidegger begins Being and Time, there is something that lends itself to the concept of Nothing, not mainly through methodology, but through intra-ontology and how concepts function within ontological systems.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the essay argue that humans are not anthropocentric?\",\"answer\":\"It states that we have never been anthropocentric because, insofar as consciousness goes, we are tools for that consciousness—linked to the idea of humans as “selfish genes” and as Nothings interacting with the outside through Being.\"}]","Nothing and Nothingness - A Treatise on the Nature ofExistence | PDF",1789960509,62]