[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-585409-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-585409-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","noaa-education-partnerships-2013-portfolio-review-final-report-august-2014-updated-november-2014","NOAA Education Partnerships 2013 Portfolio Review - Final Report - August 2014 (Updated November 2014)","","NOAA Education Partnerships 2013 Portfolio Review final report evaluates how NOAA Education partnerships are formed, fostered, sustained, and assessed, using an evidence-based evaluation design. The study addresses National Research Council recommendations by examining survey data, core models, and case studies to evaluate progress toward education output measures. Findings synthesize research questions, response to NRC recommendations, and partner assessment criteria. The report culminates in recommendations for strengthening future partnership evaluation, including supporting documentation in appendices.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/noaa-education-partnerships-2013-portfolio-review-final-report-august-2014-updated-november-2014/585409/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/noaa-education-partnerships-2013-portfolio-review-final-report-august-2014-updated-november-2014/585409.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Aria Callaghan","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-03","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of the NOAA Education Partnerships 2013 Portfolio Review study?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The study responds to National Research Council recommendations and aims to better understand how NOAA Education partnerships are formed, fostered, sustained, and evaluated.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How does the report assess outcomes and impacts of NOAA Education partnerships?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It uses an evaluation design that includes survey data, core models, and case studies, focusing on factors that influence assessment and partnership effectiveness.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What types of recommendations does the report provide?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The report presents recommendations based on research questions, findings, and responses to NRC recommendations, including guidance for improving future partnership evaluation.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},585409,1792189415,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962084926284,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","NOAA Education Partnerships 2013 Portfolio Review  \nFinal Report  \nAugust 2014 (Updated November 2014)  \nAuthors:  \nDiana L. Payne, Connecticut Sea Grant, University of Connecticut John Y. Baek, Office of Education  \nContributors:  \nJulie Bursek, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries Ron Gird, National Weather Service  \nMaria Murray, Office of Education  \nSeaberry Nachbar, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries Frank Niepold, Climate Program Office  \nRochelle Plutchak, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Shannon Ricles, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries Sarah Schoedinger, Office of Education  \nRonald Tardiff, University of Connecticut  \nKate Thompson, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries  \n\n| | Contact information:\u003Cbr>John Baek [john.baek@noaa.gov](john.baek@noaa.gov)[ ](john.baek@noaa.gov)NOAA Office of Education 1401 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC 20230 [http://www.oesd.noaa.gov](http://www.oesd.noaa.gov) |\n| --- | --- |\n\nTable of Contents  \nINTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3  \nMETHODS ............................................................................................................................. 5  \nRESULTS ............................................................................................................................... 11  \nSurvey Data ............................................................................................................. 11  \nCore Models ............................................................................................................. 21  \nCase Studies ............................................................................................................. 23  \nDISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 50  \nResearch Questions ................................................................................................. 50  \nResponse to NRC Recommendations ...................................................................... 55  \nRECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................... 58  \nREFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 60  \nAPPENDICES ......................................................................................................................... 62  \nA. NOAA Education Partnership Survey ................................................................ 62  \nB. List of Acronyms ................................................................................................. 67  \nList of Figures  \n1. NOAA Education Partnerships Portfolio Review Evaluation Design ............................. 6  \n2. NOAA Education Partnerships Portfolio Review Timeline ............................................ 7  \n3. Type of Partner Institutions ............................................................................................. 12  \n4. Type of Partnership Mechanisms .................................................................................... 13  \n5. Current Status of the Partnership ................................................................................... 13  \n6. Length of the Partnership ................................................................................................ 14  \n7. Geographic Focus of the Partnership .............................................................................. 15  \n8. NOAA and Partner Locations .......................................................................................... 15  \n9. NOAA Funding Contributed to the Partnership ............................................................. 16  \n10. NOAA FTE Contributed to the Partnership ................................................................... 16  \n11. Criteria ","cbCairF4la4VfU0G","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairF4la4VfU0G","pdf",2710584,68,"English","# Introduction\n# Methods\n# Results\n## Survey Data\n## Core Models\n## Case Studies\n# Discussion\n## Research Questions\n## Response to NRC Recommendations\n# Recommendations\n# References\n# Appendices\n## NOAA Education Partnership Survey\n## List of Acronyms","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the NOAA Education Partnerships 2013 Portfolio Review study?\",\"answer\":\"The study responds to National Research Council recommendations and aims to better understand how NOAA Education partnerships are formed, fostered, sustained, and evaluated.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the report assess outcomes and impacts of NOAA Education partnerships?\",\"answer\":\"It uses an evaluation design that includes survey data, core models, and case studies, focusing on factors that influence assessment and partnership effectiveness.\"},{\"question\":\"What types of recommendations does the report provide?\",\"answer\":\"The report presents recommendations based on research questions, findings, and responses to NRC recommendations, including guidance for improving future partnership evaluation.\"}]","NOAA Education Partnerships 2013 Portfolio Review - Final Report - August 2014 (Updated November 2014) | PDF",1792054668,171]