[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-298757-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-298757-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","no-25-1215-brief-of-asylum-seeker-advocacy-project-and-national-employment-law-project-amici-curiae","No. 25-1215 - Brief of Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and National Employment Law Project Amici Curiae","","Certificate and filing sections for an appellate case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, involving Jorge Rivera Lujan and others versus the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. The amici curiae brief supports petitioners’ emergency motion for a stay pending review of an Interim Final Rule by FMCSA. It includes certifications regarding parties, rulings, and related cases, counsel consent under Circuit Rule 29, and corporate disclosure for ASAP and NELP.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/no-25-1215-brief-of-asylum-seeker-advocacy-project-and-national-employment-law-project-amici-curiae/298757/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/no-25-1215-brief-of-asylum-seeker-advocacy-project-and-national-employment-law-project-amici-curiae/298757.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Finn","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-18",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",15,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What motion does the amici curiae brief support?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It supports petitioners’ emergency motion for a stay pending review of the challenged Interim Final Rule.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Which parties and organizations are referenced in the filing certifications?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The certifications identify petitioners and amici curiae, stating the amici are the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP) and the National Employment Law Project (NELP).",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What does the corporate disclosure statement indicate?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It states ASAP and NELP are not publicly held corporations and have no parent corporations, and that no publicly held corporation has 10% or more stock of any amicus organization.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},298757,1789764823,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},34359740700684,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/1f400023980c374ae676?_k=1777273430885731487","ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCEDULED  \nNo. 25-1215  \nUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT  \nJorge Rivera Lujan, et al.,  \nPetitioners-Appellants,–  \nv.–  \nFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, et al.,  \nRespondents-Appellees.  \nOn Petition for Review of a Final Rule of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration  \nBRIEF OF ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT AND NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT ASAMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS’EMERGENCY MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING REVIEW.  \nJoseph M. Sellers  \nCOHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL  \n1100 New York Ave. NW, Suite 800  \nWashington, DC 20005  \n(202) 408-4600  \n[jsellers@cohenmilstein.com](jsellers@cohenmilstein.com)  \nCounsel for Amici Curiae  \nDaniel E. Ocampo  \nNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT 90 Broad St. 11th Fl.  \nNew York, NY 10003  \n(646) 693-8233  \n[docampo@nelp.org](docampo@nelp.org)  \nMarcela X. Johnson  \nASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT 228 Park Ave. S. \\#84810 New York, NY 10003  \n(646) 937-0164  \n[marcela.johnson@asylumadvocacy.com](marcela.johnson@asylumadvocacy.com)  \nCERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES  \nPursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 28(a)(1), amici curiae the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP) and the National Employment Law Project (NELP)  \ncertify that:  \n(A) Parties and Amici  \nParties: Except for amici curiae, all parties and intervenors are listed in Petitioners’Rivera Lujan, et al. Emergency Motion for a Stay.  \nAmici: Undersigned amici are the ASAP and NELP.  \n(B) Ruling under Review  \nOn October 20, 2025, Petitioners Jorge Rivera Lujan, Aleksei Semenovskii, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (AFSCME), and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) petitioned this Court for review of an Interim Final Rule issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) (the “Rule”) . On October 24, 2025, Petitioners filed with this Court an Emergency Motion for a Stay of the Rule pending review.  \n(C) Related Cases  \nAmici are aware of no pending related cases.  \nDate: October 30, 2025 Respectfully submitted,  \nJoseph M. Sellers  \nCOHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL 1100 New York Ave. NW  \nSuite 800  \nWashington, DC 20005  \n(202) 408-4600  \n[jsellers@cohenmilstein.com](jsellers@cohenmilstein.com)  \nCounsel for Amici Curiae  \nCERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO CIRCUIT RULE 29  \nPursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 29(b), undersigned counsel for amici curiae represent that counsel for all parties have consented to the filing of this brief.  \nPursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 29(d), undersigned counsel for amici curiae certify that a separate brief is necessary because, as of the date of this certification, they are aware of no other brief that addresses in depth the combined interests and experiences of workers impacted by the challenged Rule.  \nCORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT  \nPursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and D.C. Circuit Rule 26.1, counsel for amici curiae make the following disclosure: The Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP) and the National Employment Law Project (NELP) are not publicly held corporations and have no parent corporations. No publicly held corporation has 10% or more of the stock of any amicus organization.  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \nINTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ....................................................................... 1  \nINTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 2  \nARGUMENT ....................................................................................................... 3  \nI. The Rule is already causing harm to drivers, as illustrated by the experiences of eleven impacted workers................................................................................ 4  \nII. The government cannot articulate any countervailing harms....................... 10  \nCONCLUSION ..............................................................................................","cbCailqipvGSGqW9","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailqipvGSGqW9","pdf",284423,23,"English","# Interest of Amici Curiae\n# Introduction\n# Argument\n## The Rule is already causing harm to drivers, as illustrated by the experiences of eleven impacted workers\n## The government cannot articulate any countervailing harms\n# Conclusion\n# Table of Authorities\n## US Supreme Court Cases\n## Federal Cases\n## Federal Statutes\n## Federal Rules\n## Federal Regulations\n## Other Authorities","[{\"question\":\"What motion does the amici curiae brief support?\",\"answer\":\"It supports petitioners’ emergency motion for a stay pending review of the challenged Interim Final Rule.\"},{\"question\":\"Which parties and organizations are referenced in the filing certifications?\",\"answer\":\"The certifications identify petitioners and amici curiae, stating the amici are the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP) and the National Employment Law Project (NELP).\"},{\"question\":\"What does the corporate disclosure statement indicate?\",\"answer\":\"It states ASAP and NELP are not publicly held corporations and have no parent corporations, and that no publicly held corporation has 10% or more stock of any amicus organization.\"}]","No. 25-1215 - Brief of Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and National Employment Law Project Amici Curiae | PDF",58]