[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-136949-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":73,"doc-detail-136949-en":123},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":66,"head_meta":68,"extra_data":70,"updated_unix":72},105,"en","netchoice-llc-appellees-unopposed-motion-to-stay-the-mandate-pending-petition-for-writ-of-certiorari-no-21-51178","NETCHOICE, L.L.C. - APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY THE MANDATE PENDING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (No. 21-51178)","","Appeal case No. 21-51178 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit addresses NETCHOICE, L.L.C. and the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) against Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas. The filing requests that the court stay the mandate while the parties pursue a petition for a writ of certiorari. The document includes a certificate of interested persons describing corporate ownership and listing counsel and participating amici and their associated organizations.",{"@graph":14,"@context":65},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/netchoice-llc-appellees-unopposed-motion-to-stay-the-mandate-pending-petition-for-writ-of-certiorari-no-21-51178/136949/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/netchoice-llc-appellees-unopposed-motion-to-stay-the-mandate-pending-petition-for-writ-of-certiorari-no-21-51178/136949.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Evangeline","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-06","2026-08-22",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What information is provided in the Certificate of Interested Persons?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It certifies interested persons and entities under Rule 28.2.1, states relevant corporate ownership information, and lists counsel of record and amici participation.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":67,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":69,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":71,"site_id":7},136949,1787396506,{"code":4,"msg":74,"data":75},"success",[76,80,84,88,93,98,103,107,112,115,119],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":77,"show_sort_weight":78,"slug":79},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":81,"show_sort_weight":82,"slug":83},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":89,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":90,"show_sort_weight":91,"slug":92},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":94,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":99,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":100,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":102},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":104,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},8,30,"research-report",{"id":108,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":113,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":114},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":118},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":120,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":122},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":74,"data":124},{"doc_id":71,"user_id":125,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":126,"doc_module":4,"category_id":104,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":127,"file_id":128,"file_url":129,"file_type":130,"file_size":131,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":132,"language":133,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":134,"faqs":135,"seo_title":136,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":72,"read_time":137},13056703019662,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/be000253a8e92610077?_k=1778726343310543188","Case: 21-51178 Document: 00516489553 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2022  \nNo. 21-51178  \nIn the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit  \nNETCHOICE, L.L.C., A 501( C )(6) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ORGANIZATION  \nDOING BUSINESS AS NETCHOICE; COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, A 501( C ) (6) NON-STOCK VIRGINIA CORPORATION  \nDOING BUSINESS AS CCIA,  \nPlaintiffs-Appellees, v.  \nKEN PAXTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS,  \nDefendant-Appellant.  \nOn Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00840-RP  \nAPPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY THE MANDATE PENDING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI  \nSteven P. Lehotsky Gabriela Gonzalez-Araiza Jeremy Evan Maltz LEHOTSKY KELLER LLP  \n200 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001  \nKatherine C. Yarger LEHOTSKY KELLER LLP  \n700 Colorado Blvd., \\#407 Denver, CO 80206  \nScott A. Keller Matthew H. Frederick Todd Disher LEHOTSKY KELLER LLP  \n919 Congress Ave. Austin, TX 78701 [scott@lehotskykeller.com](scott@lehotskykeller.com)[ ](scott@lehotskykeller.com)(512) 693-8350  \nCounsel for Plaintiffs-Appellees  \nCase: 21-51178 Document: 00516489553 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/29/2022  \nCERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS  \nNo. 21-51178  \nNetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice; Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA,  \nPlaintiffs-Appellees,  \nv.  \nKen Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas,  \nDefendant-Appellant.  \nThe undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons and entities as described in the fourth sentence of Rule 28.2.1 have an interest in the outcome of this case. Plaintiffs-Appellees NetChoice and CCIA have no parent corporations and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of their respective stock. These representations are made in order that the judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification orrecusal.  \nPlaintiffs-Appellees:  \nNetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice; and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c)(6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA  \nCase: 21-51178 Document: 00516489553 Page: 3 Date Filed: 09/29/2022  \nCounsel for Plaintiffs-Appellees:  \nScott A. Keller (lead counsel) Steven P. Lehotsky  \nKyle D. Hawkins Matthew H. Frederick Todd Disher  \nKatherine C. Yarger Jonathan D. Urick Gabriela Gonzalez-Araiza Jeremy Evan Maltz LEHOTSKY KELLER LLP  \nDefendant-Appellant:  \nKen Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas  \nCounsel for Defendant-Appellant:  \nKen Paxton Brent Webster  \nJudd Edward Stone II Ryan Baasch Benjamin S. Lyles  \nBenjamin S. Walton Christopher D. Hilton Courtney Brooke Corbello OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL  \nDISTRICT COURT AMICI  \nAmici in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees:  \nChamber of Progress; Connected Commerce Council; CTA; Engine Advocacy; Information Technology & Innovation Foundation; National Black Justice Coalition; Progressive Policy Institute; TechNet; Washington Center for Technology Policy; Hispanic Technology and Telecommunications Partnership  \nCase: 21-51178 Document: 00516489553 Page: 4 Date Filed: 09/29/2022  \nCounsel for Chamber of Progress, et al.:  \nWilliam Reid Wittliff WITTLIFF CUTTER P.L.L.C.  \nAmici in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees:  \nThe Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press; The American Civil Liberties Union; The Center for Democracy & Technology; The Media Law Resource Center; and American Civil Liberties Union of Texas  \nCounsel for Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al.:  \nCatherine Lewis Robb Laura Lee Prather HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP  \nAmicus in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees:  \nTechFreedom  \nCounsel for TechFreedom:  \nCorbin K. Barthold TECHFREEDOM  \nAmicus in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees:  \nEle","cbCaiszzsBouoyjQ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiszzsBouoyjQ","pdf",481266,43,"English","# Certificate of Interested Persons\n## Interested persons and corporate ownership representations\n## Counsel of record and amici listings","[{\"question\":\"What information is provided in the Certificate of Interested Persons?\",\"answer\":\"It certifies interested persons and entities under Rule 28.2.1, states relevant corporate ownership information, and lists counsel of record and amici participation.\"}]","NETCHOICE, L.L.C. - APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY THE MANDATE PENDING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (No. 21-51178) | PDF",108]