[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-137071-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-137071-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","netchoice-and-ccias-motion-for-supplemental-briefing-certificate-of-interested-parties-and-corporate-disclosure-statement","NetChoice and CCIA’s Motion for Supplemental Briefing - Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement","","NetChoice, LLC and the Computer & Communications Industry Association file a motion for supplemental briefing and include a certificate under 11th Cir. R. 26.1. The filing states that neither entity has a parent corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns ten percent or more of their stock. It further provides a detailed, enumerated list of persons and entities known to have an interest in the outcome of the appeal, identifying roles such as attorneys and amicus curiae.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/netchoice-and-ccias-motion-for-supplemental-briefing-certificate-of-interested-parties-and-corporate-disclosure-statement/137071/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/netchoice-and-ccias-motion-for-supplemental-briefing-certificate-of-interested-parties-and-corporate-disclosure-statement/137071.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Theodora","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-08-22",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What does the filing certify regarding corporate ownership?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It certifies that NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association have no parent corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of their stock.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What is the purpose of the certificate under 11th Cir. R. 26.1?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The certificate identifies parties and entities known to have an interest in the outcome of the appeal, including attorneys and amici.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How are interested persons and entities presented in the document?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"They are provided as a numbered list, with each entry indicating the person/entity and its role (e.g., attorney for a party or amicus curiae).","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},137071,1787399486,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":145},687197207919,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/a000253d6f5f7c60be?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1779446848396160552","# UNITED STATES COURT OFAPPEALSFOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT\n\n\n| NETCHOICE,LLC,and the COMPUTER  \u003Cbr>&COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY  \u003Cbr>ASSOCIATION,  \u003Cbr>Plaintiffs-Appellees,  \u003Cbr>V.  \u003Cbr>ATTORNEY GENERAL,STATE OF  \u003Cbr>FLORIDA,et al.  \u003Cbr>Defendants-Appellants.   |\n| --- |\n\nNo.21-12355  \n# NETCHOICE AND CCIA’SMOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING\n\n# CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTESAND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT\n\nPursuant to 11th Cir.R.26.1,Appellees certify that NetChoice has no parentcorporation and that no publicly held corporation owns ten percent or more of itsstock.Appellees certify that the Computer &Communications Industry Associationhas no parent corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns ten percent ormore of its stock.  \nPursuant to 11th Cir.R.26.1,Appellees certify that the following is a completelist of persons and entities known to Appellees to have an interest in the outcome of  \nthis appeal:  \n1.Abdo,Alex,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \n2.Access Now,Amicus Curiae  \n3.Allen,Jason Todd,Defendant/Appellant  \n4.Allen,Kenneth Winn,Attorney for Plaintiffs/Appellees  \n5.American Center for Law and Justice,Amicus Curiae  \n6.American Civil Liberties Union of Florida,Amicus Curiae  \n7.American Civil Liberties Union,Amicus Curiae  \n8.Americans for Prosperity Foundation,Amicus Curiae  \n9.American Jewish Committee,Amicus Curiae  \n10.American Principles Project,Amicus Curiae  \n11.Amicus Populi,Amicus Curiae  \nCIP-1 of16  \n12.Andrews,Cory L.,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n13.Anti-Defamation League,Amicus Curiae  \n14.Ard,Joel B.,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \n15.Ard Law Group PLLC,Attorneys for Amicus Curiae  \n16.Authors Guild Inc.,Amicus Curiae  \n17.Babylon Bee and Not the Bee,Amicus Curiae  \n18.Bach,Nathaniel L.,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n19.Ballard Spahr LLP,Attorneys for Amicus Curiae  \n20.Ballon,Ian C.,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \n21.Barnes,Brian W.,Attorney for Defendant/Appellant  \n22.Barthold,Corbin K.,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \n23.Bassett,Glenn Allen,Attorney for Defendants/Appellants  \n24.Becket Fund for Religious Liberty,Amicus Curiae  \n25.Bell,Daniel William,Attorney for Defendants/Appellants  \n26.Bergmayer,John,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \n27.Berry,Thomas A.,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n28.Blacklock,Evelyn,Attorney for Plaintiffs/Appellees  \n29.BlueSky,a Public Benefit Corporation,Amicus Curiae  \n30.Bopp Jr.,James,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n31.Brennan,Mark W.,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \nCIP-2 of16  \n32.Boutrous Jr.,Theodore J.,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n33.Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence,Amicus Curiae  \n34.Brody,David,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n35.Brown,Bruce D.,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \n36.Burhans Jr.,Glenn T.,Attorneyfor Plaintiff/Appellee  \n37.Butler,Alan,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n38.Candeub,Adam,Amicus Curiae  \n39.Consovoy McCarthy PLLC,Attorneys for Amicus Curiae  \n40.Carome,Patrick J.,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \n41.Caso,Anthony T.,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n42.Cato Institute,Amicus Curiae  \n43.Catsambas,Marietta,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n44.Center for American Liberty,Amicus Curiae  \n45.Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence,Amicus Curiae  \n46.Center for Democracy and Technology,Amicus Curiae  \n47.Center for Growth and Opportunity,Amicus Curiae  \n48.Center for Renewing America,Amicus Curiae  \n49.Center for Social Media and Politics at New York University,Amicus Curiae  \n50.Chamber of Progress,Amicus Curiae  \n51.Charis Lex P.C.,Attorneys for Amicus Curiae  \nCIP-3 of 16  \n52.Chea,Michael A.,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n53.Children's Health Defense,Amicus Curiae  \n54.Clark,Christopher Roy,Attorneyfor Plaintiff/Appellee  \n55.Clark,William T.,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n56.Clary,Grayson,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n57.Clement,Paul D.,Attorneyfor Plaintiffs/Appellees  \n58.Clouthier Cooperstein PLLC,Attorneys for Amicus Curiae  \n59.Coale,John P.,Attorney for Amicus Curiae  \n60.Cole,David D.,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \n61.Cooperstein,Theodore M.,Attorneyfor Amicus Curiae  \n62.Corn-Revere,Robert,Attor","cbCaiu6Yw6yaiMbx","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiu6Yw6yaiMbx","pdf",4758345,23,"English","# Motion for Supplemental Briefing\n# Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement","[{\"question\":\"What does the filing certify regarding corporate ownership?\",\"answer\":\"It certifies that NetChoice and the Computer \\u0026 Communications Industry Association have no parent corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of their stock.\"},{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the certificate under 11th Cir. R. 26.1?\",\"answer\":\"The certificate identifies parties and entities known to have an interest in the outcome of the appeal, including attorneys and amici.\"},{\"question\":\"How are interested persons and entities presented in the document?\",\"answer\":\"They are provided as a numbered list, with each entry indicating the person/entity and its role (e.g., attorney for a party or amicus curiae).\"}]","NetChoice and CCIA’s Motion for Supplemental Briefing - Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement | PDF",58]