[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-601855-105":59,"doc-detail-601855-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","neoliberalism-resistance-and-self-limiting-language","Neoliberalism, Resistance, and Self-Limiting Language","","An overview of articles and themes in a special issue on Chicago public school reform, with critical remarks on the scholarship itself. The discussion argues that reforms are not presented as organic developments but as strategic efforts by policymakers and special interests. It describes how education “innovations” are tested on poor and minority children amid increasing acceptance of segregation. It further critiques researchers’ language practices that may alienate policymakers and communities, potentially creating echo chambers that hinder substantive policy change.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/neoliberalism-resistance-and-self-limiting-language/601855/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/neoliberalism-resistance-and-self-limiting-language/601855.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"ahduag","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-04","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the main purpose of the special-issue discussion?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It provides an overview of the articles and themes in the Chicago school reform special issue and adds critical comments on the scholarship.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Why does the discussion claim the reforms are not “organic”?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The reforms are portrayed as outcomes of strategic efforts by policymakers and special interests rather than natural developments.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How does the discussion evaluate researchers’ language use?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It argues that exclusive language tied to attacks on “neoliberalism” can increase credibility through obscure terminology while also alienating researchers from policymakers and the people they aim to help, limiting engagement in policy debates.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},601855,1792230868,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},3985747870414,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","SPECIAL ISSUE Restructuring and Resisting Education Reforms in Chicago’s Public Schools  \neducation policy analysis archives  \nA peer-reviewed, independent, open access, multilingual journal  \nArizona State University  \n\n| Volume 25 Number 60 | June 5, 2017 | ISSN 1068-2341 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n\nNeoliberalism, Resistance, and Self-Limiting Language  \nChristopher Lubienski  \nIndiana University  \nUnited States  \nCitation: Lubienski, C. (2017). Neoliberalism, resistance, and self-limiting language. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(60). [http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2991](http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2991 This)[ This](http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2991 This) article is part of  \nEPAA/AAPE’s Special Issue on Restructuring and Resisting Education Reforms in Chicago’s Public Schools, Guest Edited by Federico Waitoller and Rhoda R. Gutierrez.  \nAbstract: This discussion offers an overview of the articles and themes developed by the papers in this special issue on Chicago school reform, and also some critical comments on such scholarship. It highlights how these reforms are not organic, as they are often portrayed, but are instead a result of strategic efforts by policymakers and special interests. As the authors of these articles show, these reforms essentially experiment with education“innovations” on poor and minority children in a context where segregation appears to be increasingly accepted. But while the efforts of equity-minded researchers in addressing these issues should be lauded, this discussion goes further and offers some critical commentary on researchers’ use of language, arguing that we too often alienate ourselves from both the policymakers we seek to influence and from the people we seek to help. By adopting exclusive language common in critical theory’s attack on “neoliberalism,”  \nscholars may try to enhance their own credibility by demonstrating familiarity with obscure terminology, but in doing so, may be creating another echo-chamber which excludes them from policy discussions that can effect substantive change.  \nKeywords: education policy, education reform, equity, critical theory  \nNeoliberalismo, resistencia y lenguaje autolimitado  \nResumen: Esta discusión ofrece una visión general de los artículos y temas desarrollados por los artículos en esta edición especial sobre la reforma de la escuela de Chicago y también algunoscomentarios críticos sobre esta beca. Destaca cómo estas reformas no son orgánicas, como amenudo se retratan, pero son, en cambio, resultado de esfuerzos estratégicos de responsables políticos e intereses especiales. Como muestran los autores de estos artículos, estas reformas experimentan esencialmente las “innovaciones” de educación sobre niños pobres y minoritariosen un contexto en el que la segregación parece ser cada vez más aceptada. Pero, aunque losesfuerzos de los investigadores de mentalidad equitativa para abordar estas cuestiones deben seralabados, esta discusión va más allá y ofrece algunos comentarios críticos sobre el uso del lenguaje por parte de los investigadores, argumentando que con demasiada frecuencia nosalejamos de los diseñadores de políticas que buscamos influir y de las personas que queremosayudar. Al adoptar un lenguaje común común en el ataque de la teoría crítica al neoliberalismo, los estudiosos pueden intentar aumentar su propia credibilidad demostrando familiaridad con laterminología oscura, pero, al hacerlo, puede estar creando otra cámara de eco que excluye las discusiones políticas que pueden afectar el cambio sustantivo.  \nPalabras-clave: política educativa; reforma de la educación; equidad; teoría crítica  \nNeoliberalismo, resistência, e linguagem auto-limitante  \nResumo: Esta discussão oferece uma visão geral dos artigos e temas desenvolvidos pelos artigos nesta edição especial sobre a reforma da escola de Chicago e também alguns comentários críticos sobre essa bolsa de estudos. Ele destaca como essas reformas não são orgânicas, com","cbCaiubPLU59CZEp","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiubPLU59CZEp","pdf",449181,15,"English","# Neoliberalism, Resistance, and Self-Limiting Language\n## Special issue overview and themes\n## Reform framing and strategic policymaking\n## Resistance, segregation, and equity-minded research\n## Critical commentary on scholars’ language use","[{\"question\":\"What is the main purpose of the special-issue discussion?\",\"answer\":\"It provides an overview of the articles and themes in the Chicago school reform special issue and adds critical comments on the scholarship.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the discussion claim the reforms are not “organic”?\",\"answer\":\"The reforms are portrayed as outcomes of strategic efforts by policymakers and special interests rather than natural developments.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the discussion evaluate researchers’ language use?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that exclusive language tied to attacks on “neoliberalism” can increase credibility through obscure terminology while also alienating researchers from policymakers and the people they aim to help, limiting engagement in policy debates.\"}]","Neoliberalism, Resistance, and Self-Limiting Language | PDF",1792093554,38]