[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-602312-105":59,"doc-detail-602312-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","negotiating-curricular-censorship-a-frame-analysis-of-two-cases-in-catholic-schools-602312","Negotiating Curricular Censorship - A Frame Analysis of Two Cases in Catholic Schools","","Negotiating Curricular Censorship examines how censorship policies are framed and negotiated within Catholic schools as book removal decisions unfold. Using frame analysis, the study compares two cases of book censorship and traces how insiders (administrators, students, families, alumni) and outsiders (news outlets, the public) competed to establish the relevance of their interpretive frames. Findings show that educational leaders struggle to reconcile institutional expectations with local community values, while community insiders ultimately shaped discourse and outcomes. The analysis challenges assumptions about private religious schools as inherently sites of censorship and highlights community perspectives.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/negotiating-curricular-censorship-a-frame-analysis-of-two-cases-in-catholic-schools-602312/602312/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/negotiating-curricular-censorship-a-frame-analysis-of-two-cases-in-catholic-schools-602312/602312.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"dawugda","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the central focus of the paper?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The paper focuses on how curricular censorship is framed and negotiated in Catholic schools, specifically through two book censorship cases.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What method does the study use?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It uses frame analysis to examine how different groups attempt to make their frames relevant in response to the removal of a particular text.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Who influences the discourse and outcomes in the cases?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"In these cases, the voices of community insiders ultimately shaped the discourse and the resulting outcomes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},602312,1792786442,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},3985747870947,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","| education policy analysis archives\u003Cbr>A peer-reviewed, independent, open access, multilingual journal\u003Cbr>Arizona State University\u003Cbr>|\n| --- |\n| Volume 33 Number 50 August 26, 2025 ISSN 1068-2341 |\n\nNegotiating Curricular Censorship: A Frame Analysis of Two Cases in Catholic Schools  \nKierstin Giunco  \nUniversity of Cincinnati  \nUnited States  \nCitation: Giunco, K. (2025). Negotiating curricular censorship: A frame analysis of two cases in Catholic schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 33(50). [https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.33.8599](https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.33.8599)  \n[Abstract:](Abstract: In today)[ In today](Abstract: In today)’s educational landscape, where censorship is increasingly being used to control and homogenize ideologies, it’s crucial to examine how censorship policies are being framed and subsequently negotiated. This paper uses frame analysis to analyze two instances of book censorship in Catholic schools, exploring how insiders (e.g., administrators, students, families, alumni) and outsiders (e.g., news outlets, general public) attempted to establish their frame’s relevancy as they responded to the removal of a particular text. The analysis reveals that educational leaders face challenges in reconciling institutional expectations with local community values, but ultimately, in these cases, it was the voices of community insiders that shaped the discourse surrounding the policy and its outcomes. Through this analysis, the paper contributesa nuanced understanding of censorship in educational settings, challenging the assumption that private religious schools are inherently sites of censorship, and emphasizing the value of community perspectives in efforts to understand censorship.  \nKeywords: curriculum censorship; book ban; frame analysis; private religious schools  \nNegociando la censura curricular: Un análisis de marcos interpretativos de dos casos enescuelas católicas  \nResumen: En el panorama educativo actual, donde la censura se utiliza cada vez más para controlar y homogeneizar ideologías, es fundamental examinar cómo se enmarcan y negocian  \nposteriormente las políticas de censura. Este artículo emplea el análisis de marcos interpretativos para estudiar dos casos de censura de libros en escuelas católicas, explorando cómo los actores internos (por ejemplo, administradores, estudiantes, familias, exalumnos) y externos (porejemplo, medios de comunicación, público general) intentaron establecer la relevancia de su marco interpretativo al responder a la eliminación de un texto específico. El análisis revela que los líderes educativos enfrentan desafíos al conciliar las expectativas institucionales con los valores de la comunidad local, pero, en última instancia, en estos casos, fueron las voces de los actores internos de la comunidad las que moldearon el discurso y los resultados. A través de este análisis, el artículo ofrece una comprensión matizada de la censura en contextos educativos, cuestiona la suposición de que las escuelas religiosas privadas son inherentemente espacios decensura y destaca el valor de las perspectivas comunitarias para comprender este fenómeno. Palabras-clave: censura curricular; prohibición de libros; análisis de marcos; escuelas religiosasprivadas  \nNegociando a censura curricular: Uma análise de enquadramento de dois casos em escolas católicas  \nResumo: No cenário educacional atual, em que a censura vem sendo cada vez mais usada para controlar e homogeneizar ideologias, é fundamental examinar como as políticas de censura estãosendo formuladas e posteriormente negociadas. Este artigo utiliza a análise de enquadramento para investigar dois casos de censura de livros em escolas católicas, explorando como atores internos (por exemplo, administradores, estudantes, famílias, ex-alunos) e externos (porexemplo, veículos de imprensa, público em geral) tentaram estabelecer a relevância de seu enquadramento ao reagirem à remoção de um determinado texto. A análise revela que os ","cbCaiq37XSRkzyww","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiq37XSRkzyww","pdf",377405,22,"English","# Abstract\n## Introduction and Context\n## Research Approach: Frame Analysis\n## Cases and Findings\n## Implications","[{\"question\":\"What is the central focus of the paper?\",\"answer\":\"The paper focuses on how curricular censorship is framed and negotiated in Catholic schools, specifically through two book censorship cases.\"},{\"question\":\"What method does the study use?\",\"answer\":\"It uses frame analysis to examine how different groups attempt to make their frames relevant in response to the removal of a particular text.\"},{\"question\":\"Who influences the discourse and outcomes in the cases?\",\"answer\":\"In these cases, the voices of community insiders ultimately shaped the discourse and the resulting outcomes.\"}]","Negotiating Curricular Censorship - A Frame Analysis of Two Cases in Catholic Schools | PDF",1792094455,55]