[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-144469-en":3,"doc-seo-144469-105":29,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":94},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":11,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"site_id":23,"html_lang":22,"table_of_contents":24,"faqs":25,"seo_title":26,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},144469,7971461741311,"Ophelia","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/74000253aff267980c6?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1779345379180704826",4,"Exam","NEGA RSEF 2022 Project Rubric - SCIENCE (Senior Division)","NEGA RSEF 2022 Science (Senior Division) project rubric outlines scoring expectations across research, methodology, execution, and communication. It specifies that the research question must be clear, focused, contribute to the field, and be testable using scientific methods. It also evaluates study design, controls and variables, systematic data collection and analysis, statistical and mathematical applications, reproducibility, and adequate data for interpretation. Additional emphasis is placed on creativity, poster organization and graphics, and interview responses including understanding limitations and potential impact. Mandatory form reviews are required for all projects and for specified research types.","NEGA RSEF 2022 Project Rubric – SCIENCE (Senior Division)  \nProject ID Number:    \n\n| CRITERIA For Science Projects |  | FAIR | AVERAGE |  | GOOD | SUPERIOR |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| I. Research Question (10 pts)\u003Cbr>● clear and focused purpose\u003Cbr>● identifies contribution to field of study\u003Cbr>● testable using scientific methods |  | 3 | 4 5 6 |  | 7 8 | 9 10 |\n| II. Design and Methodology (15 pts)\u003Cbr>● well-designed plan and data collection methods\u003Cbr>● variables and controls defined, appropriate and complete |  | 7 | 8 9 10 11 |  | 12 13 | 14 15 |\n| III. Execution: Data Collection, Analysis and Interpretation (20 pts)\u003Cbr>● systematic data collection and analysis\u003Cbr>● reproducibility of results\u003Cbr>● appropriate application of mathematical and statistical methods\u003Cbr>● sufficient data collected to support\u003Cbr>interpretation and conclusions |  | 10 11 | 12 13 14 15 |  | 16 17 | 18 19 20 |\n| IV. Creativity/Originality/Inventiveness (20 pts)\u003Cbr>● project demonstrates significant\u003Cbr>creativity/originality/inventiveness in one or more of the above criteria (I, II, or III) |  | 10 11 | 12 13 14 15 |  | 16 17 | 18 19 20 |\n| V. Presentation – Poster (10 pts)\u003Cbr>● logical organization of material\u003Cbr>● clarity of graphics and legends\u003Cbr>● supporting documentation well selected & displayed |  | 3 | 4 5 6 |  | 7 8 | 9 10 |\n| V. Presentation – Interview (25 pts)\u003Cbr>● clear, concise, thoughtful responses to questions\u003Cbr>● understanding of basic science relevant to project\u003Cbr>● understanding interpretation and limitations of results and conclusions\u003Cbr>● degree of independence in conducting project\u003Cbr>● recognition of potential impact in science, society and/or economics\u003Cbr>● quality of ideas for further research\u003Cbr>● for team projects, contributions to and understanding of project by all members |  | 13 14 | 15 16 17 18 19 20 |  | 21 22 | 23 24 25 |\n| Subtotals |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Judge’s Initials   |  | Combined Total (100 Point Maximum) |  |  |  |  |\n| MANDATORY FORMS REVIEW (Please check forms present at display.) |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| These forms are required for ALL projects |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| ❏ Official Abstract Form ❏ Form 1 Checklist for Adult\u003Cbr>Sponsor | ❏ Form 1A Student Checklist\u003Cbr>❏ Research Plan/Project Summary |  |  | ❏ Form 1BApproval Form |  |  |\n| These forms are required for certain types of research projects. |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| ❏ Form 1C Regulated Research Setting\u003Cbr>❏ Form 2 Qualified Scientist ❏ Form 3 Risk Assessment | ❏ Form 4 Human Participants ❏ Forms 5A/5B Vertebrate Animals ❏ Form 6A Potentially Hazard Bio Agents |  |  | ❏ Form 6B Human/Animal Tissue ❏ Form 7 Continuation |  |  |","cbCairbwZMoJfXXV","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairbwZMoJfXXV","pdf",212378,1,"English","en",105,"# CRITERIA For Science Projects\n## I. Research Question\n## II. Design and Methodology\n## III. Execution: Data Collection, Analysis and Interpretation\n## IV. Creativity/Originality/Inventiveness\n## V. Presentation – Poster\n## V. Presentation – Interview\n## Mandatory Forms Review","[{\"question\":\"What must a senior science project research question include to score in the top range?\",\"answer\":\"It must be clear and focused, identify a contribution to the field of study, and be testable using scientific methods.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the rubric evaluate design and methodology?\",\"answer\":\"It assesses whether the plan and data collection methods are well designed, and whether variables and controls are defined, appropriate, and complete.\"},{\"question\":\"What presentation elements are judged in both the poster and the interview?\",\"answer\":\"The poster is scored for logical organization, clarity of graphics and legends, and well-selected supporting documentation. The interview is scored for clear and thoughtful responses, understanding relevant basic science, interpretation and limitations, independence in conducting the project, and recognition of potential impact.\"}]","NEGA RSEF 2022 Project Rubric - SCIENCE (Senior Division) | PDF",1787702937,3,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":23,"language":22,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":33,"description":14,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":89,"head_meta":91,"extra_data":93,"updated_unix":27},"nega-rsef-2022-project-rubric-science-senior-division","",{"@graph":35,"@context":88},[36,51,71],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,47,49],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":46},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":48,"name":12,"@type":42,"position":28},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/nega-rsef-2022-project-rubric-science-senior-division/144469/",{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":52,"image":53,"author":58,"headline":13,"publisher":60,"fileFormat":63,"inLanguage":22,"description":14,"dateModified":64,"datePublished":65,"encodingFormat":63,"isAccessibleForFree":66,"interactionStatistic":67},"DigitalDocument",{"url":54,"@type":55,"width":56,"height":57},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/nega-rsef-2022-project-rubric-science-senior-division/144469.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":9,"@type":59},"Person",{"url":40,"name":61,"@type":62},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-12","2026-08-26",true,{"@type":68,"interactionType":69,"userInteractionCount":11},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":70},"ViewAction",{"@type":72,"mainEntity":73},"FAQPage",[74,80,84],{"name":75,"@type":76,"acceptedAnswer":77},"What must a senior science project research question include to score in the top range?","Question",{"text":78,"@type":79},"It must be clear and focused, identify a contribution to the field of study, and be testable using scientific methods.","Answer",{"name":81,"@type":76,"acceptedAnswer":82},"How does the rubric evaluate design and methodology?",{"text":83,"@type":79},"It assesses whether the plan and data collection methods are well designed, and whether variables and controls are defined, appropriate, and complete.",{"name":85,"@type":76,"acceptedAnswer":86},"What presentation elements are judged in both the poster and the interview?",{"text":87,"@type":79},"The poster is scored for logical organization, clarity of graphics and legends, and well-selected supporting documentation. The interview is scored for clear and thoughtful responses, understanding relevant basic science, interpretation and limitations, independence in conducting the project, and recognition of potential impact.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":90,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":61,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":92,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":23},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":95},[96,100,104,107,112,117,122,127,132,135,139],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},70,"exam",{"id":108,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":113,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":119,"show_sort_weight":120,"slug":121},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":125,"slug":126},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":130,"slug":131},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":130,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":133,"show_sort_weight":130,"slug":134},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":136,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":137,"show_sort_weight":136,"slug":138},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":140,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":141,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":142},19,"General","general"]