[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-180415-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-180415-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","naaig-igaming-impact-report-state-impacts-analysis","NAAiG-iGaming-Impact-Report - State Impacts Analysis","","NAAiG-iGaming-Impact-Report evaluates the impacts of iGaming on U.S. states by contrasting positive fiscal contributions with negative economic consequences. The report highlights online gaming tax revenue as a key positive outcome while outlining downstream effects such as reduced taxes from casino gaming and associated job and labor income losses. It quantifies net tax gains, job losses, labor income impacts, and value-added (GDP) loss across multiple states using 2024 iGaming revenue, 21+ population, and revenue-per-capita metrics.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/naaig-igaming-impact-report-state-impacts-analysis/180415/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/naaig-igaming-impact-report-state-impacts-analysis/180415.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Himbo","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-07","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",17,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What positive impact does the report attribute to iGaming for states?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The report identifies online gaming tax revenue as the primary positive impact, contributing to state net tax gains.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What negative downstream effects does the report link to reduced casino gaming taxes?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It links reduced casino gaming to losses including well-paying jobs, less in-state purchasing, and reduced ability to meet fiscal obligations and fund physical plant expansion.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How does the report quantify economic effects across states?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It provides state-level tables showing net tax gain (in $m), job and labor income losses (in $m), and value added (GDP) loss, alongside 2024 iGaming NGR and 21+ population and revenue per capita.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},180415,1788340681,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},687197100911,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/a000239b6f1da00475?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1785132997149421697","| Positive Impacts on States | Negative Impacts on States |\n| --- | --- |\n| Online Gaming Tax Revenue | Reduced Taxes from Casino Gaming\u003Cbr>Reduced Casino Gaming Has Direct and Downstream Effects\u003Cbr>-Loss of Well-Paying Jobs\u003Cbr>-Less In-State Purchasing by Casino\u003Cbr>-Inability to Meet Fiscal Obligations to Local Community\u003Cbr>-Reduced Capacity to Invest in Physical Plant Expansion\u003Cbr>-Loss of Would-Be Jobs\u003Cbr>-Reduced Property Tax Mitigation of Increased Disordered Gambling\u003Cbr>-Public and Private Entities Treat Disordered Gambling\u003Cbr>-Savings Reductions |\n\n\n|  | Positive Effects | Negative Effects |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n|  |  | Value Added (GDP) Loss |\n| State | Net Tax Gain ($m) | Job Losses Labor Income Loss ($m) ($m) |\n| Colorado | $154.8 | -1,739 ($109 .7) ($313 . 1) |\n| Illinois | $81.9 | -4,733 ($292 .9) ($831 .7) |\n| Indiana | $37.7 | -2,149 ($158 . 1) ($428 .6) |\n| Louisiana | ($34.0) | -2,642 ($163 .6) ($410 .5) |\n| Maine | $36.4 | -378 ($22 .0) ($59 .7) |\n| Maryland | $19.4 | -1,451 ($109 .7) ($372 .5) |\n| Mississippi | $37.8 | -1,906 ($96 .0) ($302 .6) |\n| New York | $140.8 | -4,921 ($449 .3) ($1,170 .7) |\n| Ohio | $233.9 | -2,818 ($203 .9) ($602 .0) |\n\n\n| State | Years of Operation | 2024 iGaming NGR | 2024 Population 21+ | 2024 Revenue Per Capita 21+ |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Connecticut | 3 | $428,517,140 | 2,768,483 | $154.8 |\n| Delaware | 11 | $62,638,661 | 785,164 | $79.8 |\n| Michigan | 4 | $2,198,379,380 | 7,576,288 | $290.2 |\n| New Jersey | 11 | $2,185,772,907 | 7,113,622 | $307.3 |\n| Pennsylvania | 5 | $2,181,669,450 | 9,939,120 | $219.5 |\n| West Virginia | 4 | $244,601,218 | 1,357,021 | $180.2 |\n| Total |  | $7,301,578,756 | 29,539,698 | $247.2 |\n\n\n| State | Population (21+) | Spend per Capita | iGaming Revenue ($m) |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Colorado | 4,798,638 | $266.6 | $1,279.5 |\n| Illinois | 9,491,938 | $256.7 | $2,436.2 |\n| Indiana | 5,199,551 | $269.8 | $1,403.1 |\n| Louisiana | 3,421,994 | $256.1 | $876.3 |\n| Maine | 1,136,390 | $269.9 | $306.7 |\n| Maryland | 4,920,395 | $250.9 | $1,234.7 |\n| Mississippi | 2,182,012 | $265.4 | $579.1 |\n| New York | 15,856,194 | $253.9 | $4,026.4 |\n| Ohio | 9,016,083 | $259.0 | $2,334.8 |","cbCail0By3toT2eh","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCail0By3toT2eh","pdf",1290147,79,"English","# Positive Impacts on States\n## Online Gaming Tax Revenue\n## Downstream Effects of Casino Gaming\n# Economic Impact Tables\n## Net Tax Gain and Value Added Loss\n## Jobs and Labor Income Losses\n## 2024 iGaming Revenue and Population Metrics","[{\"question\":\"What positive impact does the report attribute to iGaming for states?\",\"answer\":\"The report identifies online gaming tax revenue as the primary positive impact, contributing to state net tax gains.\"},{\"question\":\"What negative downstream effects does the report link to reduced casino gaming taxes?\",\"answer\":\"It links reduced casino gaming to losses including well-paying jobs, less in-state purchasing, and reduced ability to meet fiscal obligations and fund physical plant expansion.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the report quantify economic effects across states?\",\"answer\":\"It provides state-level tables showing net tax gain (in $m), job and labor income losses (in $m), and value added (GDP) loss, alongside 2024 iGaming NGR and 21+ population and revenue per capita.\"}]","NAAiG-iGaming-Impact-Report - State Impacts Analysis | PDF",199]