[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-15253":3,"doc-seo-15253":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"table_of_contents":24,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},15253,7971461740886,"Theodore","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2",7,"Healthcare","MRI Lesion Distribution Criteria for MS, NMOSD and MOGAD Differentiation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","Multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and MOGAD can present with overlapping clinical and MRI features, creating diagnostic difficulties. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated conventional MRI lesion distribution criteria proposed for disease differentiation. Matthews brain MRI criteria showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for MS versus seropositive NMOSD and additional comparisons, while Cacciaguerra brain–spinal cord criteria also performed strongly; applicability concerns were low.","cbCaiufzxbOoOgCp","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiufzxbOoOgCp","pdf",2713609,8,1,12,"English","en","",1776561570,30,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":23,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":24,"description":14,"schema_data":32,"social_meta":67,"head_meta":70,"extra_data":72,"updated_unix":25},105,"mri-lesion-distribution-criteria-for-ms-nmosd-and-mogad-differentiation-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis",{"@graph":33,"@context":66},[34,51],{"@type":35,"itemListElement":36},"BreadcrumbList",[37,41,45,48],{"item":38,"name":39,"@type":40,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":42,"name":43,"@type":40,"position":44},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":40,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":40,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/mri-lesion-distribution-criteria-for-ms-nmosd-and-mogad-differentiation-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/15253/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":38,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-05","2026-04-19",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction","https://schema.org",{"og:url":68,"og:type":69,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/mri-lesion-distribution-criteria-for-ms-nmosd-and-mogad-differentiation-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/15253","article",{"robots":71,"canonical":68},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]