[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33146":3,"doc-seo-33146":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},33146,4810365810221,"Aurora","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d",8,"Research & Report","More Fuss About Formulation: Sider (and Me) on Three-and Four-Dimensionalism","Sider argues that four-dimensionalism admits a clear and coherent formulation while three-dimensionalism cannot be adequately formulated. Christopher Hughes contends that Sider’s concerns about formulating three-dimensionalism are misplaced. Hughes proposes an alternative three-dimensionalist formulation not covered by Sider’s rejected options, then offers a “matching” formulation of four-dimensionalism, claiming it captures the view better than Sider’s own account. The paper also addresses the intelligibility worries raised by van Inwagen.","cbCaievApj0UWtZW","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaievApj0UWtZW","pdf",81233,1,18,"English","en","# Abstract\n# Sider’s Problem for Formulating Three-Dimensionalism\n## “Wholly Present” and Competing Definitions\n# Hughes’s Alternative Three-Dimensionalist Formulation\n# A “Matching” Formulation of Four-Dimensionalism\n# Comparison with Sider’s View","[{\"question\":\"How does Hughes evaluate his “matching” formulation of four-dimensionalism?\",\"answer\":\"Hughes provides a “matching” formulation of four-dimensionalism and argues that it captures four-dimensionalism better than Sider’s own formulation. He presents this as an improvement over Sider’s account.\"}]",1782203371,45,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":76,"head_meta":78,"extra_data":80,"updated_unix":25},105,"more-fuss-about-formulation-sider-and-me-on-three-and-four-dimensionalism","",{"@graph":34,"@context":75},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/more-fuss-about-formulation-sider-and-me-on-three-and-four-dimensionalism/33146/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"How does Hughes evaluate his “matching” formulation of four-dimensionalism?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"Hughes provides a “matching” formulation of four-dimensionalism and argues that it captures four-dimensionalism better than Sider’s own formulation. He presents this as an improvement over Sider’s account.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":77,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":79,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]