[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31865":3,"doc-seo-31865":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31865,4398048949847,"Eliana","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/400002536579ef2da7f?_k=1778318612642679267",8,"Research & Report","Metamodernism The Future of Theory","Metamodernism: The Future of Theory presents a theoretical framework that moves beyond postmodern deconstruction toward a “becoming metamodern.” The work develops a process social ontology, proposes a multispecies hylosemiotics, and argues for a revaluation of the role of values within the human sciences. It also advances an alternative to the sterile opposition between realism and anti-realism, aiming at humble, zetetic forms of knowledge and emancipatory critical inquiry.","cbCairntDbk6tDYo","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairntDbk6tDYo","pdf",1609365,1,375,"English","en","# Preface and Acknowledgments\n# Opening\n## Into the Abyss: Postmodernism Unraveling\n## Overview of the Work\n# Part I: Metarealism\n## Realism as Scientism\n## Varieties of Mind-Dependence\n## Metarealism: Modes of the Real\n# Part II: Process Social Ontology\n## Concepts in Disintegration & Strategies for Demolition\n## Process Social Ontology\n## Social Kinds\n# Part III: Hylosemiotics\n## Hylosemiotics: The Discourse of Things\n## Beyond the Linguistic Turn\n# Part IV: Knowledge and Value\n## Zetetic Knowledge\n## The Revaluation of Values\n# Conclusion","[{\"question\":\"What impasse in religious studies motivates this monograph?\",\"answer\":\"The author describes an impasse created by scholars rejecting the analytical utility of the category “religion,” which limits research to repetitive deconstruction or overly narrow case studies.\"},{\"question\":\"What central theoretical components does the book propose?\",\"answer\":\"It proposes a process social ontology, a new multispecies semiotics (hylosemiotics), and a revaluation of the place of values in the human sciences, alongside an alternative to strict realism vs. anti-realism binaries.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the work aim to produce knowledge differently?\",\"answer\":\"The framework emphasizes “humble” knowledge and develops zetetic approaches—knowledge that doubts, avoids certainty, and relies on inference beyond simple pattern recognition.\"}]",1780347678,945,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"metamodernism-the-future-of-theory","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/metamodernism-the-future-of-theory/31865/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-01",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What impasse in religious studies motivates this monograph?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"The author describes an impasse created by scholars rejecting the analytical utility of the category “religion,” which limits research to repetitive deconstruction or overly narrow case studies.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"What central theoretical components does the book propose?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"It proposes a process social ontology, a new multispecies semiotics (hylosemiotics), and a revaluation of the place of values in the human sciences, alongside an alternative to strict realism vs. anti-realism binaries.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"How does the work aim to produce knowledge differently?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"The framework emphasizes “humble” knowledge and develops zetetic approaches—knowledge that doubts, avoids certainty, and relies on inference beyond simple pattern recognition.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]