[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31334":3,"doc-seo-31334":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31334,13056703019404,"Miles","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0",7,"Healthcare","Meta Analysis Of The Comparison Of Laparoscopic Pectopexy And Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy","Laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) are compared for the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP), focusing on surgical outcomes, effectiveness, and safety. A comprehensive search across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, and CNKI (through April 2023, no language limits) included randomized controlled trials and comparative studies. Ten studies (n=760) were analyzed for operative time, bleeding, catheterization duration, complications, and recurrence, concluding that LP shows comparable efficacy with improved safety.","cbCaifKBWm78BO1I","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifKBWm78BO1I","pdf",2010608,1,9,"English","en","# Abstract\n## Background and objective\n## Search strategy and selection\n## Main results and conclusion\n# Introduction\n## Background\n## Objectives\n# Methods\n## Eligibility criteria\n## Search strategy","[{\"question\":\"What was the purpose of comparing laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC)?\",\"answer\":\"To compare outcomes and effectiveness for treating female pelvic organ prolapse (POP), including both efficacy and safety aspects.\"},{\"question\":\"Which types of studies and participants were included in the meta-analysis?\",\"answer\":\"All randomized controlled trials and comparative studies reporting complete results were included; data limitations led to contacting authors and excluding low-quality sources like case reports, reviews, and conference materials.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the key findings favoring LP over LSC?\",\"answer\":\"LP showed shorter operation time and lower bleeding volume, reduced postoperative indwelling catheterization time, fewer total postoperative complications, and fewer postoperative prolapse recurrences.\"}]",1779310928,23,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"meta-analysis-of-the-comparison-of-laparoscopic-pectopexy-and-laparoscopic-sacrocolpopexy","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/meta-analysis-of-the-comparison-of-laparoscopic-pectopexy-and-laparoscopic-sacrocolpopexy/31334/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-20",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What was the purpose of comparing laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC)?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"To compare outcomes and effectiveness for treating female pelvic organ prolapse (POP), including both efficacy and safety aspects.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"Which types of studies and participants were included in the meta-analysis?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"All randomized controlled trials and comparative studies reporting complete results were included; data limitations led to contacting authors and excluding low-quality sources like case reports, reviews, and conference materials.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What were the key findings favoring LP over LSC?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"LP showed shorter operation time and lower bleeding volume, reduced postoperative indwelling catheterization time, fewer total postoperative complications, and fewer postoperative prolapse recurrences.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]